There Are Some Very Interesting Ideas Here And There Are Gen

There Are Some Very Interesting Ideas Here And There Are Generally Cl

There are some very interesting ideas here, and there are generally clear topic sentences. If you can summarize those topic sentences into a thesis, you can provide a succinct thesis for the reader that will provide a clear focus at the opening. There’s a lot of jargon and very broad terms in the essays, and those would really benefit from some explanation or less formal language. There are some very big claims here that rest solely on personal authority, and despite your knowledge, you are not a reputable enough authority to have those claims be persuasive for an informed audience. Because those claims are so big, they need significant additional development to support them.

It is often difficult to know exactly what comes from sources and what is your argumentation, and I would encourage you to use the signal phrase when moving into source material. That is particularly true in the second essay here, which appears to have long sections taken from sources that are not cited clearly. Those citations will need to come through in a revision in order to remove suspicions of plagiarism and make for a passing paper. There are more comments in the text. Focus Organization Development Use of language (source work) Paper goals Even presentation Clear claims X 5 Development in support Points: 0/250 Samm Jiwu Cui Samm Erickson WR122 Feb 21, 2017 Should we limit technology to have more real life social contact?

Paper For Above instruction

The ongoing debate concerning whether to limit technology use in order to promote more real-life social contact presents complex arguments rooted in societal change, technological advancements, and human psychological needs. At the core of this discussion lies a question: does excessive reliance on digital devices and social media hinder or enhance human social interaction? This essay explores both perspectives, underscoring the importance of balanced technology use to foster authentic personal relationships while recognizing the undeniable benefits of digital connectivity.

Physical social interaction has experienced a significant decline with the proliferation of social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. According to Hastac (2014), the increased use of digital gadgets has reduced the frequency of face-to-face communication, especially among younger generations who tend to prioritize online interactions over physical presence. This shift has implications for social cohesion, community engagement, and emotional well-being. Critics argue that social media encourages passive and superficial connections that lack the depth of in-person relationships, leading to social isolation and loneliness. Conversely, proponents contend that digital platforms facilitate broader social networks, enabling marginalized groups to find support and share ideas beyond geographical limitations.

Research indicates that excessive multitasking between screens can impair cognitive functions such as attention span, memory, and creativity. Elmansy (2015) posits that technology can stunt creative development by diverting individuals' focus from offline pursuits. Furthermore, Barker et al. (2002) have demonstrated that prolonged exposure to digital media, especially violent or passive content such as television and online gaming, can diminish creative thinking and problem-solving skills. Such findings suggest that unrestricted use of technology may hinder personal growth and societal innovation, emphasizing the need for moderation.

Additionally, the use of social media has been linked to increased moral decay and exposure to unsafe environments for young users. Critics argue that platforms like Facebook and Twitter expose teenagers and children to risks such as cyberbullying, exploitation, and exposure to inappropriate content. Limited access, particularly for minors, is proposed as a safeguard to prevent these harms and promote responsible online behavior. Some scholars, including sociologists, argue that young individuals lack the maturity to make informed decisions about their social media presence, further supporting restrictions based on age and maturity levels.

Despite these concerns, social media also offers significant benefits in fostering connectivity, especially in a globalized world. Platforms like Facebook enable individuals to maintain long-distance relationships, connect with interest groups, and participate in online communities that support personal and professional development. Van Zyl (2009) discusses how social networking enhances organizational collaboration and individual learning opportunities, illustrating that digital connectivity can complement rather than replace in-person interactions.

From a practical perspective, limiting technology use might inadvertently diminish social opportunities for those who rely on digital platforms for social engagement, career networking, and information sharing. For example, social media has become instrumental in job searches, romantic connections, and community activism. It also provides a space for marginalized voices to be heard. Therefore, rather than advocating for strict limits, a balanced approach where technology use is moderated based on context and individual needs can optimize its benefits while mitigating drawbacks.

In conclusion, the debate over limiting technology to enhance real-life social contact must consider the multifaceted nature of digital platforms. outright restrictions could hinder social capital, professional growth, and access to information, while unrestricted use might foster superficial relationships and social detachment. A nuanced strategy promoting responsible and mindful use of technology, emphasizing offline interactions, and safeguarding vulnerable groups emerges as the most constructive path forward. Encouraging individuals to consciously balance online and offline social activities can help preserve the depth and authenticity of human relationships in an increasingly digital world.

References

• Barker, M., & Petley, J. (2002). Ill effects: The media violence debate. Routledge.
• Elmansy, R. (2015, June 22). How Social Media Affects Your Creativity. Retrieved February 21, 2017, from https://www.designorate.com/how-social-media-affects-creativity/
• Hastac. (2014). Social Media’s Effect on Human Interaction.
• Van Zyl, S. (2009). The impact of social networking 2.0 on organisations. The Electronic Library, 27(6).
• Claywell, C. R. (2016, February 10). Advantages and Disadvantages of Social Networking. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from Lovetoknow.
• Pfeffer, J., Zorbach, T., & Carley, K. M. (2014). Understanding online firestorms: Negative word-of-mouth dynamics in social media networks. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20(1-2), 1-19.
• Smith, A. (2018). Social Media Use in 2018. Pew Research Center.
• Katz, J. E. (2010). How Technology Changes the Nature of Social Relationships. Journal of Social Sciences, 45(3), 56-70.
• Jones, S., & Fox, S. (2009). Generations online in 2009. Pew Internet & American Life Project.
• Taljack, W. (2017). The Role of Social Media in Modern Society. Journal of Digital Culture, 12(4), 295-312.