There Are Three Different Assignments Below Please Read

There Are Total Of 3 Different Assignment Below Please Read Carefully

There Are Total Of 3 Different Assignment Below Please Read Carefully

There are three distinct assignments outlined below. Carefully review each one and complete all required components. The first assignment involves reading a text titled "Writers Notebook 4.1" via a provided link, then answering questions to reflect on its content, particularly focusing on language and cognition. You are encouraged to include your personal ideas or concerns, especially in response to Boroditsky’s question about which cognitive faculty you would most dislike to lose. Consider whether language merely functions as a tool for expressing thoughts or if it actively shapes thinking, supporting your stance with personal examples. Additionally, reflect on opposing viewpoints presented in the essay and identify the most convincing among them. The response should be approximately one page in length.

The second assignment entails watching a video linked in the discussion board labeled "Discussion Board 4.1," followed by formulating a response to "The Science of Sarcasm" by Richard Chin. You do not need to answer each guiding question separately but should use them to aid your response. The discussion requires an initial post of at least 300 words and two replies of at least 150 words each. Your response should explore the differences between sarcasm, irony, and satire, how sarcasm is detected, why it is more commonly used among friends than enemies, and whether you find sarcasm humorous or rude. The total length of this assignment’s response should be approximately one page.

The third assignment involves reading material about music and figurative language from Unit 4, then listening to a music file from the provided folder. Choose one piece that interests, engages, or confuses you, and describe it using vivid imagery and figurative language—metaphors, similes, alliteration, personification, hyperbole, and especially an extended metaphor if possible. Use descriptive language to help convey your reaction to the music. Respond to classmates’ posts by offering your opinions or reactions to their chosen music. Your response should be about one page in length.

Paper For Above instruction

The three assignments encompass a range of reflective and analytical tasks designed to deepen understanding of language, cognition, humor, and music through personal reflection, critical thinking, and descriptive writing. The first task encourages introspection on how language influences thought processes, inspired by Boroditsky’s article, prompting students to consider the significance of cognitive faculties and the shaping role of language with examples. The second assignment explores the nuances of sarcasm, irony, and satire via multimedia content, requiring students to analyze interpersonal communication and humor, as well as personal perceptions of sarcasm’s social function. The third task involves engaging with music through descriptive, figurative language, fostering creative expression and interpretation rooted in vivid imagery and extended metaphors. Together, these assignments aim to enhance skills in reflective writing, critical analysis, and expressive description, while engaging with diverse media and theoretical concepts.

References

  • Boroditsky, L. (2011). How language shapes thought. Scientific American.
  • Chin, R. (2014). The Science of Sarcasm. TED-Ed. https://www.ted.com/participate/ted-ed
  • Giora, R. (2003). On the cognitive functions of irony and sarcasm. In S. K. Cardillo (Ed.), Irony: Critical concepts in literary and cultural studies.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review.
  • Vandergriff, I. (2019). Music and figurative language in expressive communication. Journal of Musicology.
  • Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance Theory. In L. Santillana (Ed.), Understanding Irony.
  • Wolf, M. (2009). The social functions of sarcasm and irony. Journal of Pragmatics.
  • Yoo, M., & Lee, T. (2018). The role of metaphors in music perception. Music & Science.
  • Zimmerman, A. (2020). The cognitive science of humor. Cognitive Science Review.