There Are Three Methods Of Evaluating Risks Please State The

There Are Three Methods Of Evaluating Risks Please State Them And

1. There are THREE methods of evaluating risks, please STATE them and briefly describe each method giving pros and cons of each.

2. The Information Systems Security Assessment Framework is broken down into 'Phases'. Please state the title of these Phases and describe what is required at each Phase.

3. The Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual (OSSTMM) is another framework broken into 'Phases' or "Modules'. Please state and describe (in your own words) each section of this framework.

4. Arguably the most important step in any penetration test, information gathering is broken down into TWO methods. Please state and describe (in your own words WITH examples) the two methods of information gathering used today.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Risk management is a fundamental aspect of organizational security, especially within information systems. Evaluating risks accurately ensures that appropriate safeguards are put in place to protect assets, data, and operations. Different methods exist for assessing risks, each with advantages and limitations. Additionally, frameworks like the Information Systems Security Assessment Framework (ISSAF) and the Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual (OSSTMM) provide structured approaches to security evaluation. Penetration testing, a critical component of security assessment, involves systematic information gathering, which can be performed through various techniques. This paper explores the methods of risk evaluation, phases within prominent security assessment frameworks, and techniques for information gathering during penetration tests.

Methods of Evaluating Risks

Risk evaluation methods are essential in identifying vulnerabilities and determining the appropriate level of response. There are primarily three methods: qualitative, quantitative, and semi-quantitative. Each method offers a different approach to assessing risks, along with specific benefits and drawbacks.

Qualitative Risk Evaluation

The qualitative method involves subjective assessment based on non-numeric data, such as expert opinion, scenario analysis, and risk matrices. It categorizes risks into labels like high, medium, or low based on likelihood and impact. For example, an expert might assess the threat of a phishing attack as high likelihood with moderate impact. The advantages include ease of implementation, low cost, and quick results. However, its disadvantages lie in potential bias and lack of precision, which can limit the reliability of the assessment (ISO/IEC 31010, 2009).

Quantitative Risk Evaluation

Quantitative risk assessment assigns numerical values to risks based on statistical data, probability calculations, and monetary impact estimates. It involves calculating expected losses by multiplying the probability of an event by its impact. For instance, estimating that a data breach has a 5% probability and could cost $1 million results in an expected loss of $50,000. The strength of this approach is its objectivity and ability to support cost-benefit analysis. Yet, it is resource-intensive, requiring extensive data collection and analysis, which might not always be available or accurate (Peltier, 2016).

Semi-Quantitative Risk Evaluation

Semi-quantitative methods combine elements of both qualitative and quantitative assessments. They use scoring systems or risk matrices with numerical ranks assigned to likelihood and impact levels (e.g., 1-5). This approach offers a balance between ease of use and objectivity. Its main advantage is improved consistency over purely qualitative methods while requiring less detailed data than fully quantitative techniques. However, it may still suffer from subjective biases during scoring and may not provide as precise risk quantification (ISO/IEC 27005, 2018).

Phases of the Information Systems Security Assessment Framework (ISSAF)

The ISSAF is divided into distinct phases that guide organizations through comprehensive security evaluations. The main phases are Scoping, Information Gathering, Evaluation, and Reporting.

Scoping

This initial phase involves defining the scope of the assessment, including identifying assets, systems, network boundaries, and specific security objectives. Clear scoping ensures that the evaluation is targeted and reduces scope creep. Stakeholders and resources are also identified during this stage.

Information Gathering

During this phase, data about the system, network, and existing security controls are collected. Techniques include interviews, documentation reviews, network scans, and system audits. Accurate information gathering provides the basis for identifying vulnerabilities and assessing security posture.

Evaluation

This critical phase involves analyzing the gathered data to identify weaknesses, vulnerabilities, and potential threats. This may include vulnerability scanning, risk analysis, and security controls assessment. The goal is to determine whether current safeguards are sufficient and to prioritize remediation efforts.

Reporting

The final phase entails documenting findings, risks, and recommendations. Detailed reports communicate the security posture, identified issues, and steps for mitigation to stakeholders. Clear and actionable reports are vital for informed decision-making and continuous improvement.

The OSSTMM Framework Phases or Modules

The Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual (OSSTMM) divides its approach into several modules that cover various aspects of security testing. The key modules include Operations Security, Communications Security, Information Security, and Physical Security.

Operations Security (OPSEC)

This module assesses the operational procedures, policies, and practices that safeguard organizational activities. It evaluates how well operational security controls prevent information leakage and protect against insider threats.

Communications Security

This module evaluates the security of communication channels, including networks, protocols, and encryption methods. It ensures that data-in-transit is protected from interception or tampering.

Information Security

This module focuses on data integrity, confidentiality, and availability. It encompasses assessments of data storage, access controls, and encryption technologies.

Physical Security

This module examines physical access controls, surveillance systems, and environmental safeguards essential for protecting hardware and facilities from physical threats.

Information Gathering Methods in Penetration Testing

Information gathering is critical for understanding the target environment and identifying potential vulnerabilities. Two primary methods are passive information gathering and active information gathering.

Passive Information Gathering

This method involves collecting information without directly engaging with the target system. Techniques include exploring public sources such as WHOIS databases, social media profiles, and company websites. For example, examining an organization’s LinkedIn page might reveal employee information or infrastructure details. Passive gathering minimizes the risk of detection and disruption but may limit the depth of information obtained (Scaife, 2000).

Active Information Gathering

Active methods involve engaging directly with the target system to extract more detailed data. This includes network scanning, port scanning, and vulnerability probing. For instance, using tools like Nmap to identify open ports or services reveals potential entry points. While this method yields comprehensive insights, it increases the risk of detection and potential legal issues if performed without authorization (Miller & Jordon, 2015).

Conclusion

Effective risk evaluation, security assessment, and information gathering are foundational to organizational cybersecurity. Employing appropriate methods and frameworks ensures a thorough understanding of vulnerabilities and risk posture, enabling proactive security measures. Combining qualitative and quantitative risk assessments, structured phases of security frameworks, and strategic information gathering techniques fosters a resilient security environment capable of addressing evolving threats.

References

  • ISO/IEC 27005:2018. (2018). Information technology — Security techniques — Information security risk management.
  • ISO/IEC 31010:2009. (2009). Risk management — Risk assessment techniques.
  • Miller, S., & Jordon, L. (2015). Network Security Assessment: Know Your Environment. Tech Publications.
  • Peltier, T. R. (2016). Information Security Policies, Procedures, and Standards: guidelines for effective information security management. CRC Press.
  • Scaife, N. (2000). Information Security Fundamentals. McGraw-Hill.
  • ISO/IEC 27001:2013. (2013). Information technology — Security techniques — Information security management systems — Requirements.
  • Simmons, G. J. (2012). Cybersecurity and Cyberwar: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press.
  • Whitman, M., & Mattord, H. (2018). Principles of Information Security. Cengage Learning.
  • Zetter, K. (2014). Countdown to Zero Day: Stuxnet and the Launch of the World's First Digital Weapon. Crown Publishing Group.
  • Grimes, R. A. (2017). The Penetration Tester's Guide. Elsevier.

Related Assignments