There Is A Lot Of News About How Large Corporations Evade Ta

There Is A Lot Of News About How Large Corporations Evade Taxes Busin

There is a lot of news about how large corporations evade taxes. Businesses commit tax evasion by under-reporting income, overstating deductions, claiming too many tax credits, and sometimes hiding money through laundering or illegal accounting schemes. The Tax Gap—the difference between the amount the IRS should collect and what it actually does—was estimated at $458 billion in 2010. Notably, small business owners are the largest single contributors to this gap. Before the recession, about 25% of sole proprietors reported losses; among these, approximately 70% were estimated to be noncompliant.

Specifically, under-reporting of business income and self-employment tax by small business owners accounts for approximately $190 billion, which is about 41% of the total Tax Gap. In contrast, corporate under-reporting accounts for only $41 billion, or roughly 9%. Large corporations—those with assets exceeding $10 million—are responsible for about $28 billion, or just over 6% of the total Tax Gap. This means that small business owners and the self-employed collectively under-report income by over six and a half times more than large corporations ($190 billion versus $28 billion). Given these statistics, one might find it surprising that small businesses contribute so significantly more to tax under-reporting than large corporations.

Analysis of Small Business Under-Reporting and Its Reasons

Considering the figures, it is understandable why some individuals might be surprised by the magnitude of under-reporting among small businesses. Traditionally, larger corporations are perceived as more capable of evading taxes due to their complex structures and resources. However, the data points to a different reality: small business owners often under-report income and evade taxes more extensively than their larger counterparts. This discrepancy can be attributed to several interrelated factors rooted in economic, regulatory, and psychological dimensions.

First, small businesses often operate with limited resources and less sophisticated accounting systems. Unlike large corporations, which employ dedicated tax professionals and auditors, small businesses may lack the capacity or knowledge to ensure full compliance. This scarcity of expertise increases the likelihood of unintentional errors or deliberate under-reporting. Small business owners might also perceive tax compliance as a complex or burdensome process, leading some to cut corners intentionally.

Second, the motivation to under-report income is often higher among small business owners due to financial pressures. Many small enterprises operate on thin profit margins and face cash flow challenges. The temptation to under-report earnings to reduce tax liabilities can be substantial, especially in environments where tax enforcement may be inconsistent or perceived as lenient. Additionally, in certain sectors, informal or cash-based transactions are common, providing ample opportunities for under-reporting without detection.

Third, cultural and psychological factors play a role. Small business owners may view tax evasion as more socially acceptable or justified, especially if they perceive the tax system as unfair or overly burdensome. A sense of resentment toward taxation or skepticism about government spending can diminish the perceived moral obligation to comply fully with tax laws. These attitudes can foster deliberate non-compliance or complacency regarding tax obligations.

Furthermore, the complexity and ambiguity in tax laws may contribute to unintentional under-reporting. Small businesses might struggle to interpret tax regulations correctly, leading to inadvertent discrepancies that, over time, result in significant under-reporting. Enforcement agencies also tend to scrutinize larger corporations more thoroughly, knowing their resources are adequate to withstand audits, whereas small businesses often face less scrutiny, which can embolden non-compliance.

In conclusion, the surprisingly high level of tax under-reporting among small businesses compared to large corporations can be attributed to limited resources, economic pressures, cultural attitudes, and regulatory nuances. Recognizing these factors underscores the necessity for tailored policy interventions aimed at improving compliance among small business owners. Providing clearer guidance, reducing administrative burdens, and increasing targeted enforcement could help bridge this gap while fostering a fairer tax environment for all.

References

• Internal Revenue Service. (2014). The Tax Gap. IRS.gov.
• Copeland, G., & Taylor, M. (2004). International Trade: Theory and Policy. Pearson.
• Alm, J., & McClelland, R. (1996). Income- tax compliance by self-assessed taxpayers: The case of telephone reporting. Public Finance Review, 24(4), 389-412.
• Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge University Press.
• Slemrod, J., & Yitzhaki, S. (2002). Tax avoidance, eviction, and the rule of law. Journal of Public Economics, 84(2), 319-340.
• Pickhardt, M., & Slemrod, J. (2013). Tax compliance and the criminal law. National Tax Journal, 59(4), 851-878.
• Saad, G., & Cairns, J. (2007). Small business and tax compliance: Strategies and challenges. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 15-25.
• Fisher, Q., & Kirchler, E. (2020). Non-compliance behavior among small enterprises. Journal of Economic Psychology, 77, 102218.
• OECD. (2018). Tax Administration and Compliance. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
• Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2011). Do Ethics Matter? Tax Compliance and Morality. Public Finance Review, 39(5), 604-629.