Think About An Article You Reviewed — Is It Consistent ✓ Solved

Think About An Article That You Have Reviewed Is It Consistent With T

When reviewing the article by Verhoeven, V., Tsakitzidis, G., Philips, H., & Van Royen, P. (2020), which explores the impact of COVID-19 on primary care through qualitative interviews with Flemish general practitioners, it is evident that the research is consistent with qualitative methodology. The study employs interviews to gather in-depth insights into the experiences and perceptions of primary care providers, aligning with qualitative research principles that focus on understanding phenomena from participants' perspectives (Houser, 2018). Conversely, the article by Tahan, H. M. (2020), discusses various case management practices during the COVID-19 crisis, including legal, ethical, and resilience aspects, which are presented through a descriptive, overview format more characteristic of qualitative reporting rather than quantitative measurement. The qualitative nature of the study is suitable because it captures the nuanced, subjective experiences of health professionals dealing with complex, end-of-life care and remote practices. Both articles exemplify appropriate application of qualitative research when exploring the human, ethical, and experiential dimensions of healthcare during a pandemic, reinforcing the importance of carefully matching research methods to study aims (Houser, 2018).

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted healthcare delivery worldwide, prompting researchers to explore various aspects of medical, psychological, and operational responses through different research methodologies. When reviewing articles in this domain, it is crucial to assess whether the research design aligns with the study's objectives, particularly whether the chosen methodology appropriately captures the phenomena under investigation. Two recent articles exemplify the use of qualitative approaches to study different facets of healthcare amidst the COVID-19 crisis, and their alignment with qualitative research principles provides valuable insights into their validity and utility.

The first article by Verhoeven et al. (2020) investigates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care functions through qualitative interviews with Flemish general practitioners (GPs). The study’s design involves detailed, open-ended interviews that aim to uncover the firsthand experiences, perceptions, and adaptations of GPs during the pandemic. This method aligns well with qualitative research paradigms because it emphasizes understanding complex, subjective experiences that are difficult to quantify numerically. The qualitative approach allows for rich data collection that captures the nuances of primary care providers' responses to unprecedented challenges, such as maintaining patient care while managing infection risks. Houser (2018) emphasizes that qualitative research is particularly suited for exploring phenomena where depth, context, and understanding of lived experiences are essential, which is precisely the focus of this study.

In contrast, Tahan (2020) discusses case management practices during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on end-of-life care, workers' compensation, legal and ethical considerations, remote practice, and resilience. The article adopts a descriptive approach that synthesizes existing practices and guidelines without relying heavily on quantitative data or statistical analysis. The narrative style, structured around themes and professional experiences, characterizes it as qualitative research. The appropriateness of qualitative methodology in this context lies in its ability to elucidate the complex, multifaceted responses of healthcare professionals to evolving challenges, providing a comprehensive understanding of their adaptive strategies and ethical considerations during a crisis (Houser, 2018). Together, these articles demonstrate that qualitative research methods are well-suited for exploring intricate human and operational aspects of healthcare during a pandemic environment.

In conclusion, both articles exemplify the correct application of qualitative research, as they focus on exploring the perceptions, practices, and experiences of healthcare providers facing COVID-19-related challenges. Ensuring that research designs match the study objectives not only enhances the credibility of findings but also contributes to the development of practical strategies to improve healthcare delivery under extraordinary circumstances. The importance of aligning research methods with study aims is highlighted by Houser (2018), who advocates for thoughtful methodological choices to accurately capture complex phenomena in healthcare research.

References

• Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Reading, using, and creating evidence (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Verhoeven, V., Tsakitzidis, G., Philips, H., & Van Royen, P. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the core functions of primary care: will the cure be worse than the disease? A qualitative interview study in Flemish GPs. BMJ Open, 10(6), e039674.
• Tahan, H. M. (2020). Essential Case Management Practices Amidst the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Crisis: Part 2: End-of-Life Care, Workers' Compensation Case Management, Legal and Ethical Obligations, Remote Practice, and Resilience. Professional Case Management.