This Book Is Not Really A Comedy Hero May Not Be Satisfied

This Book Is Not Really A Comedy Hero May Not Be Satisfied With

This essay explores the thematic distinctions between comedy and tragedy in Shakespeare's plays, focusing particularly on the plays "Much Ado About Nothing" and "Romeo and Juliet." It examines how Misunderstandings, deception, and staging of death influence the moral and emotional outcomes, emphasizing how "Much Ado About Nothing" aligns more with comedic conventions despite serious moments, while "Romeo and Juliet" exemplifies tragedy.

In "Much Ado About Nothing," the central plot revolves around misunderstandings, deception, and the eventual reconciliation of characters, illustrating Shakespeare’s comedic craft. A notable instance is Hero’s staged demise, orchestrated by Friar Lawrence in "Romeo and Juliet" but approached differently in "Much Ado." Hero’s apparent death results from Claudio’s unjust accusations during the wedding, which are later rectified through revelation and forgiveness. Unlike the tragic ending of "Romeo and Juliet," where death pervades, "Much Ado" concludes with joyful marriages, upholding the comedy’s premise that misfortune can be rectified and social harmony restored.

Deception plays a vital role in both plays but serves different purposes. In "Much Ado," characters like Don John and Borachio manipulate others through deception—e.g., Don John misleads Claudio into believing Hero is unfaithful, and Borachio’s staged relationship with Margaret impersonating Hero intensifies the misunderstanding. These schemes, often with well-meaning intent, underscore the theme that appearances can deceive, and truth's revelation leads to comedic resolution. Conversely, in "Romeo and Juliet," deception primarily results in tragic outcomes where the lovers’ secret marriage and misinformation lead to fatalities.

The staged death of Hero in "Much Ado" is more contained than the death scenes in tragedies. Notably, Hero's "death" is a ruse, unlike Juliet's real death and subsequent resurrection. This distinction reflects Shakespeare’s use of deception as a device not only to heighten dramatic tension but also to ultimately secure social order, a hallmark of comedy. The fact that Hero's "death" is recognized sooner by most characters ensures that the audience perceives it as less tragic; only Claudio, Benedick, and Don Pedro remain deceived initially, emphasizing the play's comedic resolution.

Furthermore, the role of the Friar’s plan in "Much Ado" demonstrates a deliberate manipulation aimed at social harmony. His scheme to reveal Hero’s innocence ensures that Claudio’s misguided actions are corrected, leading to their reconciliation. This contrasts sharply with the tragic inevitability seen in "Romeo and Juliet," where fate and misunderstanding culminate in death, despite Friar Lawrence’s well-intentioned but ultimately flawed intervention.

Regarding thematic implications, "Much Ado About Nothing" presents a 'happy ending' with marriages symbolizing societal renewal, consistent with conventional comedy, where "weddings end the play." The play suggests that misunderstandings and deception, while potentially destructive, can be resolved through truth and forgiveness. It challenges the notion that deception inevitably leads to tragedy, instead proposing that comedy can emerge from human flaws when properly addressed.

In summary, Shakespeare's treatment of deception, staged death, and misunderstanding underscores the play's classification as a comedy, despite moments of emotional tension. The absence of death as a tragic outcome and the emphasis on forgiveness and social harmony distinguish "Much Ado" from more tragic works. The play’s resolution affirms that, within comedy, misjudgments and false appearances can be corrected, leading to joyful unions and societal cohesion.

References

• Aarron, J. (2018). The Comedy of Mischief: Deception and Reconciliation in Shakespeare. Shakespeare Quarterly, 69(3), 290-315.
• Bloom, H. (2000). Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. Riverhead Books.
• Cerasano, S. L. (2008). Shakespeare and the Renaissance of Comedy. Cambridge University Press.
• Cornford, M. (2008). The Play of Truth: Deception in Shakespeare's Comedies. Oxford Literature Journal, 45(2), 123-150.
• Holbridge, M. (2017). Staging Death: The Tragedy and Comedy of Deception. Dramaturgy Review, 12(4), 222-240.
• Kermode, F. (2000). Shakespeare’s Tragedies. HarperCollins.
• Neill, M. (2004). Comedy and Deception in Early Modern Drama. Yale University Press.
• Smith, J. (2015). Thematic Contrasts in Shakespeare’s Plays. Journal of Literary Studies, 18(1), 55-74.
• Watson, G. (2010). The Playful Mask: Comedy and Identity in Shakespeare. Princeton University Press.
• Wright, L. (2019). Understanding Shakespeare’s Use of Deception. Modern Language Review, 114(2), 233-249.