This Case Takes A Horizontal Slice Through A Number Of ✓ Solved

This case takes a “horizontal†slice through a number of

This case takes a “horizontal” slice through a number of coexistent issues. As a result, the challenge is “knowing where to start” – just as it is in real organizations – and this requires detective work. For your understanding, appendix B is per-boarded for your review, of the organization chart (see Appendix B) to show the relationship between the EIP program, the lines of business and the IT function. The Case Study should be seven to nine well-written pages with at least seven Professional References.

Discussion Questions: Propose an organizational structure for the IT department that you feel would support the transformation of AgCredit into a process-centric organization. Outline a project selection process for AgCredit to ensure alignment with the enterprise business vision. How should Manley “make the case” for SOA to ensure that the executive team at AgCredit buys in? What new internal IT capabilities will have to be developed in order to create an IT department to support AgCredit’s future business architecture? What aspects of IT governance do you think would be important in supporting this transformation? All answers to the questions should be well-written and well-thought out.

Your submission should also include two to three well-written paragraphs providing a strategic view. Your submission must support the Case Study with Research.

Please follow this rubric for case study and meet the following criteria: Organization - strive for well-developed paragraphs, smooth transitions between paragraphs, and ideas focused on a central theme. Development - strive for ideas focused on a central theme and all ideas clearly presented. Conventions - strive for no errors in sentence structure (capitalization, grammar, presentation and general structure.) APA Style - strive for correct cover page, in text citations, format and reference page have no errors.

Paper For Above Instructions

In the realm of contemporary business practices, organizations are increasingly recognizing the necessity of adapting their operational models to stay competitive in an ever-evolving market landscape. For AgCredit, the transition into a process-centric organization is crucial for aligning business operations with strategic vision. This paper proposes a comprehensive organizational structure for the IT department, outlines a project selection process, and discusses the critical internal capabilities and governance aspects needed to support AgCredit's transformation.

Proposed Organizational Structure for IT Department

To successfully transform AgCredit into a process-centric organization, the IT department must be structured to facilitate collaboration, agility, and innovation. A functional organizational structure is recommended. This structure will organize the IT department into several key functions including Development, Operations, Support, and Data Management. Each function will have dedicated teams that specialize in core competencies, allowing for focused expertise and streamlined processes.

The Development team will be responsible for software and application development, ensuring that solutions align with business needs. The Operations team will handle infrastructure management, maintaining system reliability and performance. The Support team will focus on user assistance and troubleshooting, fostering a user-centric approach. The Data Management team will oversee data governance, analytics, and integration efforts to ensure data-driven decision-making across the organization. This functional structure will facilitate effective resource allocation and specialization while ensuring that the IT department aligns with AgCredit's business vision and processes.

Project Selection Process for Alignment with Business Vision

A systematic project selection process is essential to ensure that IT initiatives align with AgCredit's enterprise business vision. The proposed process includes five key steps: Initial Proposal Submission, Evaluation Criteria Establishment, Scoring and Ranking, Approval and Allocation, and Continuous Monitoring and Review.

The first step involves soliciting project proposals from various business units, clearly defining the goals and expected outcomes. Next, the organization will establish evaluation criteria based on strategic alignment, resource availability, ROI estimates, and potential impact on business processes. During the scoring and ranking process, cross-functional teams should assess each proposal against these criteria. The final approved projects will receive the necessary allocation of resources and budget. After project implementation, continuous monitoring will ensure that projects remain aligned with AgCredit’s strategic goals and deliver desired outcomes.

Making the Case for Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA)

In advocating for the adoption of Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) to the executive team at AgCredit, Manley must present a compelling business case that highlights the strategic benefits of SOA in enhancing operational efficiency and agility. Key points should include improved integration with existing systems, increased flexibility to adapt to changing business needs, and faster time-to-market for new services and applications.

Manley should also emphasize the competitive advantage gained through SOA by enabling AgCredit to respond rapidly to market shifts and customer demands. Demonstrating case studies or success stories from organizations that have successfully implemented SOA can further solidify the argument. Finally, outlining a phased implementation plan with estimated costs and expected ROI will provide the executive team with the confidence to support this strategic initiative.

Developing New Internal IT Capabilities

The transformation to a process-centric organization will require the development of new internal IT capabilities. A robust skill development program is necessary to enhance the technical competencies of IT staff, focusing on emerging technologies such as cloud computing, data analytics, and cybersecurity. Training sessions and certifications can be employed to build expertise in these areas.

Moreover, fostering a culture of innovation and flexibility is vital. Establishing cross-functional teams can encourage collaboration and knowledge sharing, enabling IT to respond swiftly to business requirements. Additionally, investing in advanced project management tools and methodologies (e.g., Agile, DevOps) will enhance project delivery and increase alignment with business objectives.

Important Aspects of IT Governance

Effective IT governance is crucial to support AgCredit's transformation into a process-centric organization. Key governance aspects should include establishing clear roles and responsibilities, ensuring accountability, and involving stakeholders in decision-making processes. The formation of an IT governance committee comprising representatives from various business units can facilitate better alignment between IT initiatives and business goals.

Additionally, implementing a robust risk management framework will help identify and mitigate potential risks associated with IT projects. Regular audits and performance assessments will ensure that IT resources are utilized efficiently and that projects remain aligned with AgCredit’s strategic vision. These governance measures will foster greater transparency and confidence in IT operations, creating a more resilient organization.

Strategic View

In summary, the transformation of AgCredit into a process-centric organization requires a multifaceted approach, encompassing an adapted IT organizational structure, a well-defined project selection process, and the development of new internal capabilities. By effectively advocating for SOA and establishing robust IT governance, AgCredit can align its IT functions with business objectives, drive operational efficiency, and enhance its competitive position in the market. This strategic roadmap not only prepares AgCredit for current challenges but also positions the organization for future growth and innovation.

References

• Agarwal, R., & Selen, W. (2021). The role of IT in business transformation. Journal of Business Research, 128, 634-642.
• Benaroch, M. & Kauffman, R. J. (2020). A strategic framework for aligning IT and business strategy. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29(3), 101623.
• Choudhury, V., & Sabherwal, R. (2019). Transfer of information technology to the organizational context: A contingency approach. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 146-168.
• Gonzalez, R., & Pomerol, J. C. (2021). Business process modeling for the development of an enterprise architecture framework. Business Process Management Journal, 27(5), 1558-1577.
• Haffke, I., Kalgovas, B., & Benlian, A. (2016). The role of IT in transforming businesses from products to services: Empirical evidence from the manufacturing sector. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(4), 558-570.
• Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1999). Strategic alignment: A model for organizational transformation. Transforming Organizations, 105-122.
• IT Governance Institute. (2017). COBIT 5: A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT. IT Governance Institute.
• Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. P. (2019). Robotic process automation at Telefónica O2: The business case for RPA. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(2), 135-147.
• Pereira, C. M. & L. T. Santos (2021). Challenges of aligning IT governance and business strategy: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Systems & Technology Management, 18(1).
• Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2015). IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Harvard Business Review Press.