This Is A Two-Part Assignment Submitted As One Document Afte

This Is A Two Part Assignment Submitted As One Document After Examini

This is a two-part assignment submitted as one document. After examining the selections assigned, analyze the readings in words total. Separate responses as "Part A" and "Part B." Part A: Analyze Use the listed questions as a guide as you analyze the selected article—write full title. Respond in 3-5 paragraphs. Do not answer questions individually.

What kind of audience is the writer addressing? What are the writer's purpose and intentions? How well does the writer accomplish this purpose? What specific kinds of evidence has the writer used? How convincing is the evidence?

Does the writer address opposing views? If so, how? Is the writer persuasive? Explain. B.

Summarize: (do not repeat an analysis) Consider the required elements as you summarize Links to an external site. the selected article—write full title. The summary should enhance your understanding of the piece. Keep in mind the components of a focused summary About ¼ of original document Writer’s main idea, purpose, intent Major details that lead to the writer’s point Writer’s conclusion (not yours!) Remain objective

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires a comprehensive analysis and summary of a selected article, emphasizing understanding of the author's audience, purpose, evidence, and persuasiveness, followed by an objective, focused summary that captures the core elements of the article without personal interpretation.

Analysis of the Selected Article

The article chosen for this analysis is titled "[Insert Full Title Here]". The primary audience targeted by the author appears to be [specify demographic, e.g., policymakers, young adults, health professionals]. Through the tone, language, and content, the author seems to aim at [state purpose, e.g., informing, persuading, raising awareness]. The author’s intentions include [e.g., highlighting a problem, advocating for change, presenting research findings]. The effectiveness of the author’s communication can be measured by how well these objectives are achieved, which appears to be [assess the clarity, engagement, and impact of the message].

The evidence presented by the author encompasses [types of evidence, e.g., statistical data, case studies, expert opinions]. This evidence is utilized to [support specific claims, provide context, enhance credibility]. The strength of this evidence varies; some may be [e.g., highly credible and compelling], while others may warrant further support for greater persuasiveness. Regarding opposing views, the author [addresses/not addresses] counterarguments by [explain briefly how opposing views are handled]. This inclusion or exclusion influences the overall persuasiveness of the article, which is [evaluate whether the argument is balanced and convincing].

Overall, the article demonstrates [assessment of persuasiveness], effectively engaging the audience through [specific strategies such as storytelling, data presentation, or emotional appeals]. The clear articulation of ideas and the evidence used contribute to its persuasive impact. However, there may be areas where counterarguments could be more thoroughly addressed to enhance credibility and strength of the argument.

Summary of the Article

The article titled "[Insert Full Title Here]" primarily aims to [state the main purpose or thesis]. The main idea revolves around [summarize core argument or focus]. Supporting this, the author provides major details such as [list significant facts, examples, or points] that lead to the main conclusion. The conclusion emphasizes [state the final message or call to action, if any].

In summarizing, it becomes evident that the author’s goal was to [restate the purpose], and this is achieved through [highlight how the details support the main idea]. Major details include [notable points that reinforce the thesis], which collectively reinforce the article’s central message. The summary remains objective, refraining from personal opinions, and instead focuses on distilling the essence of the original work.

References

• Author Last Name, First Initial. (Year). Title of the article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page numbers. DOI or URL.
• Author Last Name, First Initial. (Year). Book Title. Publisher.
• Author Last Name, First Initial. (Year). Title of the web page or article. Website Name. URL.
• Author Last Name, First Initial. (Year). Article or report title. Publisher or Institution. DOI or URL.
• Author Last Name, First Initial. (Year). Title of the source. Source Type, additional info.
• Author Last Name, First Initial. (Year). Title of the article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. DOI or URL.
• Author Last Name, First Initial. (Year). Title of the book. Publisher.
• Author Last Name, First Initial. (Year). Title of the article. Source, volume(issue), pages. DOI or URL.
• Author Last Name, First Initial. (Year). Title of the webpage or report. Publisher. URL.
• Author Last Name, First Initial. (Year). Title of the article or publication. Journal or Publisher, pages. DOI or URL.