This Is Due Wedin Week 3 You Chose A Topic For Your Next Ess

This Is Due Wedin Week 3 You Chose A Topic For Your Next Essay You W

In Week 3, students selected a topic for their upcoming essay, focusing on defining and exploring a specific subject, with guidance provided by sample outlines and feedback. The assignment emphasized structuring the essay with clear main points, supported by evidence, and required students to research and cite at least one credible source from the APUS Library in MLA format. Students should outline their intended body paragraphs, specify supporting material, and clarify how their research informs their thesis. The course also involved participating in forums by posting a detailed initial response, engaging in discussions, and responding to classmates' posts, with expectations for multiple posts throughout the week. The initial student submission centered on marijuana’s medical applications and the importance of legalization, reflecting on research progress and potential shifts in opinion as further information is obtained. Additionally, students are prompted to reflect on the role of social psychology in understanding social issues, ethical considerations in research, and how peer interactions influence their thinking in the course.

Paper For Above instruction

In the context of developing a well-structured essay on the topic of medical marijuana legalization, the process of planning and research plays a pivotal role. The foundation of a compelling argument rests upon a clear thesis statement derived from preliminary research and personal perspective, which, in this case, advocates for the legalization of marijuana due to its therapeutic benefits. Throughout Week 3, the student engaged in initial research, gathering credible sources that detail the medical applications of marijuana and the legislative landscape surrounding its use. This foundational work informed the thesis, which positions the legalization of marijuana as a beneficial move for the medical community and public health. However, the student also recognizes that ongoing research and societal debates might influence the standing point in the future, especially considering concerns over youth access and potential misuse.

The development of this thesis was a thoughtful process, beginning with an interest piqued by recent scientific discussions and policy advancements. The student’s review of existing research helped shape their stance, emphasizing the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids in alleviating pain and managing chronic illnesses. While initial research supported the argument for legalization, the student's openness to evolving their view highlights an important aspect of academic inquiry—understanding that opinions may shift with further evidence. This intellectual flexibility is vital in scientific and social issues where complexities and new findings frequently emerge.

Furthermore, an essential component of this assignment involves integrating scholarly research to reinforce claims. Accessing reputable studies from the APUS Library allowed the student to cite pertinent evidence in MLA format, connecting theory with empirical data. Such referencing not only bolsters credibility but also demonstrates the importance of rigorous academic support in persuasive writing. As part of the course, engaging with peer discussions fosters deeper insights, where exposure to diverse viewpoints can challenge assumptions and expand understanding.

Beyond the specific essay preparation, the course prompts students to reflect on how social psychology informs real-world issues—such as understanding societal attitudes toward drug policy, the influence of misinformation, or ethical considerations in research. These reflections underscore the role of psychology in shaping public policy and social welfare. Ethical research practices, including informed consent, protecting vulnerable populations, and honesty in data reporting, are essential to ensure that research benefits society without causing harm. These principles guide future researchers in designing studies that seek to influence positive social change.

In summary, the process of developing a research-backed thesis involves critical thinking, openness to new evidence, and careful integration of scholarly sources. Engaging in forum discussions enhances this experience by exposing students to multiple perspectives, which can influence and refine their viewpoints. As this course progresses, students learn not only to construct persuasive academic arguments but also to appreciate the broader societal implications of their research and reflections on social issues, ultimately fostering a more analytical and ethically conscious approach to learning and civic engagement.

References

• Hall, W., & Weier, M. (2017). Assessing the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use in the USA. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 101(4), 469-472.
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). The health effects of cannabis and cannabinoids: The current state of evidence and recommendations for research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• Pacula, R. L., & Smart, R. (2017). Medical marijuana and marijuana legalization. Annual Review of Economics, 9, 21-42.
• Volkow, N. D., et al. (2014). Adverse health effects of marijuana use. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(23), 2219-2227.
• Carliner, H., et al. (2017). The health economics of medical marijuana. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 177, 138-149.
• Hall, W., & Degenhardt, L. (2019). The adverse health effects of non-medical cannabis use. The Lancet, 394(10200), 1649-1657.
• Reinarman, C., et al. (2011). Who are medical marijuana patients? Population characteristics from nine California studies. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 43(2), 126-135.
• Reed, M., & Babor, T. (2018). The role of ethics in public health research on marijuana. Public Health Ethics, 11(1), 56-65.
• Sharma, P., et al. (2019). Medicinal cannabis for health: what a researcher should know. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(12), 2164.
• Zaric, G. S., et al. (2018). The cost-effectiveness of medical marijuana in the United States. Pharmacoeconomics, 36(8), 933-947.