This Paper Will Be Composed Of Two Parts: Part I: State Your ✓ Solved

This paper will be composed of two parts: Part I: State your

This paper will be composed of two parts: Part I: State your overall company strategy to support the business goal of your chosen business opportunity in technical terms such as pricing, differentiation, and responsiveness. Part II: Provide an initial demand forecast for your product/service for the first six months of operation. Discuss the technical rationale for your forecasting method and why it is better than other methods of forecasting. Specifically address: Clearly explain your company’s strategy to support the business goal in technical terms such as pricing, differentiation, and responsiveness; Provide an initial demand forecast for the product/service for the first six months; Discuss the technical rationale for your forecasting method and why it is better than other methods.

Paper For Above Instructions

Executive summary and chosen opportunity

This paper assumes a SaaS offering: a cloud-based web analytics dashboard targeted at small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs). The business goal is rapid market penetration to establish recurring-revenue customers and gather first-party analytics data to improve product-market fit. The following sections define a technical strategy (pricing, differentiation, responsiveness) and present a six-month initial demand forecast using a diffusion-based forecasting approach with rationale and comparison to alternative methods.

Part I — Technical company strategy

Pricing (technical terms)

Adopt a tiered, penetration-oriented subscription pricing strategy with metric-based usage caps and annual discounting to maximize early adoption and lifetime value. Technical elements: three tiers (Starter: $29/mo with API calls capped at 50k/month; Growth: $99/mo with 250k API calls and dedicated onboarding; Enterprise: $249+/mo with SLA-backed 99.9% uptime and unlimited API throughput). Use metered overage billing (per 1k API calls) and promotional annual prepayment discounts (two months free on annual plans), and implement price anchoring via feature gating (advanced ETL connectors and predictive modules only in higher tiers) to drive upgrades (Kotler & Keller, 2016).

Differentiation (technical terms)

Differentiate on data accuracy, integration breadth, and analytics latency: (1) real-time ingestion with less than 1-second event processing latency via stream-processing architecture (Kafka + Flink or managed stream service); (2) connectors for 20+ common platforms (Google Ads, Meta, Shopify, server logs) with standardized schema mapping and automated schema reconciliation; (3) built-in predictive models (cohort LTV, churn probability) offered as managed microservices. Deliver a documented API with OpenAPI/Swagger and SDKs in three languages to reduce integration friction. Emphasize compliance and security certifications (SOC 2 Type II, TLS 1.3) as part of product differentiation (Chopra & Meindl, 2016).

Responsiveness (technical terms)

Operational responsiveness will be guaranteed through auto-scaling cloud infrastructure (container orchestration with Kubernetes, horizontal pod autoscaling), multi-AZ deployment for high availability, and monitoring-driven incident response (Prometheus + Alertmanager;

Part II — Initial six-month demand forecast

Context and assumptions: The reachable SMB market for the product is estimated at 10,000 target accounts within the initial geography. Market potential (M) conservatively estimated at 2,000 paying customers (20% of reachable market) within the long run, based on competitive benchmarks and channel reach. Product launch uses targeted digital marketing and reseller partnerships expected to amplify word-of-mouth.

Forecast method and monthly numeric forecast

Forecasting method chosen: Bass diffusion model (Bass, 1969) calibrated to early-stage adoption for new technology-enabled services. Parameters assumed: innovation coefficient p = 0.02, imitation coefficient q = 0.30, market potential M = 2,000. Using Bass cumulative adoption formula, projected cumulative and incremental monthly adopters for months 1–6 are:

  • Month 1: cumulative 46 (new 46)
  • Month 2: cumulative 106 (new 60)
  • Month 3: cumulative 184 (new 78)
  • Month 4: cumulative 280 (new 96)
  • Month 5: cumulative 396 (new 116)
  • Month 6: cumulative 534 (new 138)

Translating subscriptions to revenue under an assumed average revenue per user (ARPU) of $75/month (blended across tiers), the monthly revenue from new customers in months 1–6 will approximate: $3,450, $4,500, $5,850, $7,200, $8,700, and $10,350 respectively (Hyndman & Athanasopoulos, 2018).

Technical rationale for forecasting method

Rationale: The Bass diffusion model explicitly models adoption driven by innovation (external influence) and imitation (social contagion), which is appropriate for a new SaaS product where historical internal time-series data are absent (Bass, 1969; Makridakis et al., 1998). Unlike time-series approaches (ARIMA, exponential smoothing) that require substantial historical demand data to estimate autocorrelation and seasonality reliably (Box et al., 2015), diffusion models use market potential and adoption dynamics to generate plausible early-stage trajectories (Hyndman & Athanasopoulos, 2018).

Why this is better than alternatives

1) vs. naive time-series (moving averages or exponential smoothing): Those techniques poorly extrapolate new-product behavior because they assume continuity of past demand patterns and cannot capture S-shaped adoption curves typical for technology adoption (Makridakis et al., 1998; Box et al., 2015).

2) vs. pure judgmental methods (Delphi, executive estimates): Judgmental methods are valuable when quantitative inputs are completely missing but are prone to bias and lack reproducibility; combining benchmarks and a formal diffusion model reduces subjective bias while retaining managerial assumptions (Fildes & Goodwin, 2007; Armstrong, 2001).

3) vs. causal econometric models: Causal models (e.g., regressions on ad spend, price, seasonality) require historical cross-sectional or time-series data to estimate elasticities. For a launch phase with minimal internal data, such models risk overfitting or delivering unstable estimates; however, causal models should be adopted as data accrues (Silver et al., 1998).

Operational implications and validation

Operationally, the company should implement a rolling forecast process: update Bass parameters monthly as early adoption data are observed and simultaneously begin collecting the time-series and causal data needed to transition to hybrid forecasting (diffusion + causal regression) within 3–6 months (Hyndman & Athanasopoulos, 2018). KPIs for validation include conversion rate (trial-to-paid), churn, and channel CAC; these will be used to recalibrate M, p, and q and to inform capacity planning for responsiveness (Chopra & Meindl, 2016).

Conclusion

The technical strategy—penetration, tiered pricing with metered usage, product differentiation through real-time ingestion and predictive analytics, and infrastructure responsiveness through auto-scaling and SLAs—aligns with the goal of rapid adoption and sustainable recurring revenue. The Bass diffusion model provides a defensible, technically grounded forecast for the first six months of a new SaaS offering where historical demand data are limited. As actual adoption data accumulate, the forecasting framework should evolve toward hybrid causal and time-series models to refine resource planning and pricing optimization (Hyndman & Athanasopoulos, 2018; Makridakis et al., 1998).

References

  • Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science, 15(5), 215–227.
  • Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2018). Forecasting: Principles and Practice. OTexts. Retrieved from https://otexts.com/fpp3/
  • Makridakis, S., Wheelwright, S. C., & Hyndman, R. J. (1998). Forecasting: Methods and Applications. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Armstrong, J. S. (2001). Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson.
  • Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Pearson.
  • Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., & Reinsel, G. C. (2015). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Wiley.
  • Silver, E. A., Pyke, D. F., & Peterson, R. (1998). Inventory Management and Production Planning and Scheduling. Wiley.
  • Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & Supply Chain Management (5th ed.). Pearson.
  • Fildes, R., & Goodwin, P. (2007). Good and bad judgment in forecasting: lessons from four decades of judgmental forecasting. Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, (8), 5–10.

Related Assignments