This Second Written Assignment Is A Four-Part Exercise

This Second Written Assignment Is A Four Part Exercise Comprised Of Th

This second written assignment is a four-part exercise comprised of the following sections: Ethical Question, Introduction, Explanation of the Ethical Theory, and Application of the Ethical Theory. The purpose is to define the scope and core principles of the chosen ethical theory and demonstrate how people fully committed to that theory would reason about a specific moral question. You should revise and expand on your initial answer from the first assignment, ensuring it reflects deeper understanding and research. The paper must be approximately 900 words, with clearly labeled sections, and include a title page and references page.

Part 1: Ethical Question

State the ethical question related to your topic beneath this heading. This question should relate to the same issue you explored in your Week 1 assignment, possibly revised based on instructor feedback and additional research. If you wish to change topics, consult your instructor first. The question should be clearly articulated and focused.

Part 2: Introduction

Provide an expanded introduction to your topic and ethical question. This should incorporate insights gained from further research and reflection, possibly clarifying or refining your initial ideas. Discuss any changes in focus or understanding, explain the background and significance of the issue, and provide contextual details to set up your analysis. The introduction should be at least 300 words, written in one or two cohesive paragraphs.

Part 3: Explanation of the Ethical Theory

Choose an ethical theory—utilitarianism, deontology, or virtue ethics—and focus solely on explaining that theory. Include a brief overview of its historical background and key philosophers. Clearly state the core moral principle(s)—the fundamental rule or idea that underpins the theory. Then, illustrate how the theory applies to moral questions by providing a general example unrelated to your main issue. For instance, if focusing on Kantian deontology, explain how Kant’s categorical imperative would guide moral decision-making in a hypothetical situation like lying to protect someone. The explanation should be approximately 300 words and include at least one quote from your course resources or primary texts to support your discussion.

Part 4: Application of the Ethical Theory

Apply the core principle of the chosen ethical theory to your specific ethical question. Describe how a person who fully adheres to this theory would reason about the issue and what moral conclusion they would reach. The conclusion may differ from your initial stance; the exercise is to demonstrate reasoning from the theory’s perspective. Use around 300 words to clearly articulate this reasoning process, illustrating how the principles lead logically to a particular moral judgment.

References

References

• Author, A. A. (Year). Title of book or article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range.
• Author, B. B. (Year). Title of book or article. Publisher. DOI or URL if available.
• Author, C. C. (Year). Title of online resource. Website Name. URL
• Author, D. D. (Year). Title of the primary source. Publisher or journal name.
• Author, E. E. (Year). Additional scholarly work relevant to the theory or topic.
• Author, F. F. (Year). Historical overview of the ethical theory. Journal or Book Title.
• Author, G. G. (Year). Application of the ethical theory to modern issues. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages.
• Author, H. H. (Year). Critical analysis of the ethical principles. Publisher or Journal.
• Author, I. I. (Year). Ethical theory and moral reasoning. Source Title.
• Author, J. J. (Year). Ethical dilemmas and philosophical analysis. Publisher or Journal Name.