To Complete This Assignment, Read Diagramming And Evaluating ✓ Solved

To complete this assignment, read Diagramming and Evaluating

To complete this assignment, read Diagramming and Evaluating Arguments. After reading Diagramming and Evaluating Arguments, read "Social Media: Establishing Criteria for Law Enforcement" by Robert D. Stuart. Write a claim of value response, evaluating the effectiveness of Stuart's argument. Write an essay evaluating the effectiveness/ineffectiveness of Stuart's argument. Evaluate. Don't summarize (though in your evaluation, you will likely need to briefly summarize his thesis and supporting points). Focus on evaluating how successfully and/or unsuccessfully Stuart employs specific rhetorical strategies, especially Logos, Ethos, and Pathos.

Include the title of the article and full name of the author in your introduction. Avoid the use of 1st and 2nd person and personal opinion in this essay. Stick to 3rd person. Quote the author to support your claim. No need to include outside/secondary sources. You must include in-text citations for the quotes. Length: 3 pages (does not include Title page and Reference page) 12 point, Times New Roman font, double-spaced, one inch margins. Include a Title page and References page in correct APA format. Be mindful of hanging indentations.

Follow these APA Rules for In-Text Citations: Format for a Quotation: Ordinarily, introduce the quotation with a signal phrase that includes the author’s last name followed by the year of publication in parentheses. Put the page number (preceded by “p.”) in parentheses after the quotation. Use the grading rubric as a guide to writing your essay. Required Length: 3 full pages not including your title and references pages. "1 full page" refers to a full page of 12-point Times New Roman double-spaced font that runs to the bottom of the page. Required Format: APA format is required, including a title page and page numbers formatted correctly in APA style. An abstract page is not required.

Additional requirements: 12-point Times New Roman font, double-spacing, 1-inch margins. Late Work Policy: No late work is accepted in our course. If your assignment cannot be easily opened in Microsoft Word, it is considered late. DOC, PDF, and RTF file formats are accepted. Don’t submit assignments in Pages or links to Google Docs. Insufficient Work Policy: A minimum penalty of 10% will be applied for every page under the required page length. A minimum penalty of 10% will be applied in cases where text does not run to the bottom of the page.

Excused Absence Policy: Extensions on late assignments can only be provided in the following specific cases: United States Military assignments, death of an immediate family member, documented personal illness. To request an extensions, email your instructor or send your instructor a message in Canvas as soon as possible before your absence or as soon as possible after your absence with formal verification such as a note from a health center or medical professional. An extension will not be provided without formal verification. You are responsible for having access to a computer and an internet connection to complete work in our class.

Paper For Above Instructions

The article "Social Media: Establishing Criteria for Law Enforcement" by Robert D. Stuart presents a compelling argument regarding the appropriate use of social media by law enforcement agencies. This essay aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Stuart's argument by analyzing the rhetorical strategies he utilizes, specifically focusing on ethos, logos, and pathos.

Summary of Stuart's Thesis

Stuart argues that law enforcement agencies must establish clear criteria when using social media for investigative purposes. He suggests that without such guidelines, there is potential for misuse that can infringe on citizens' rights and trust. This claim sets the stage for a broader discussion about the balance between effective policing and respecting civil liberties, which is a pertinent issue in today's society.

Evaluation of Ethos

Stuart's credibility as a law enforcement professional enhances his argument. He draws from extensive experience within the field, allowing him to present his claims with authority. By citing past incidents where social media usage by police led to public outrage, he effectively underscores the need for accountability and ethical standards. His use of personal anecdotes and professional examples builds trust with the audience, enhancing his appeal through ethos. This strategy is vital as it positions him as a knowledgeable advocate for ethical policing practices.

Evaluation of Logos

In terms of logos, Stuart effectively employs logical reasoning to support his claims. He outlines a series of hypothetical scenarios where the absence of guidelines can lead to problematic situations, effectively using deductive reasoning. For instance, he explains how the arbitrary use of social media for surveillance can lead to violations of privacy. By logically dissecting the potential consequences of unregulated social media use, Stuart provides a rational basis for his argument that is difficult to dismiss. Furthermore, he supports his claims with relevant statistical data regarding public perception of law enforcement and social media, which bolsters his argument’s credibility and logical appeal.

Evaluation of Pathos

Stuart also effectively utilizes pathos to evoke emotional responses from his audience. By presenting real-life cases of social media abuse by law enforcement, he taps into the audience's fears and concerns about privacy and civil rights. His narrative approach humanizes the issue, making it relatable and pressing. For instance, he shares disturbing stories where innocent citizens were monitored without justification, prompting readers to feel empathy for potential victims of invasive policing tactics. This emotional appeal is powerful, compelling the audience to consider the ethical implications of unfettered law enforcement access to social media.

Balance of Rhetorical Strategies

Overall, Stuart successfully balances these rhetorical strategies, creating a well-rounded and effective argument. His credibility (ethos), logical reasoning (logos), and emotional appeals (pathos) work in concert to persuade the audience of the necessity of establishing criteria for social media use in law enforcement. By addressing multiple facets of the argument, he demonstrates that the issues at stake are complex and require thoughtful consideration rather than knee-jerk reactions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Robert D. Stuart's article provides a nuanced and compelling evaluation of social media's role in law enforcement. His effective use of ethos, logos, and pathos not only emphasizes the importance of establishing criteria for social media use but also underscores the potential consequences of inadequate oversight. This multifaceted approach ensures that his argument resonates with a diverse audience and encourages critical reflection on a significant societal issue. Ultimately, Stuart's argument is both timely and necessary, offering a framework for discussions surrounding law enforcement practices in the digital age.

References

• Stuart, R.D. (Year). Social Media: Establishing Criteria for Law Enforcement.