To Complete Your Weekly Arc Assessment Assignment

To Complete Your Weekly Arc Assessment Assignment It Should Contain

To complete your weekly ARC Assessment assignment, it should contain the following pages: a minimum of 2 pages, a maximum of 3 pages, including a heading (1-2 pages) and references (1 page). The assignment begins with the body of the paper, with each week's heading aligned to the left. The last page will be your references. Use double spacing for the body of the paper. Include sources used in the paper in the references list.

Answer the questions associated with the week's assignment in paragraph format without repeating the questions. Cite any sources used to address the issues. For example: According to Hoyt, Yoshihashi, and Bailey (2012), security is an important aspect of the EHR that all employees must adhere to. Then include the Hoyt reference in the list. If a source is used multiple times, list it only once in the references. References should be listed alphabetically, single-spaced, with a space between entries.

Paper For Above instruction

The scenario presents a significant challenge in balancing healthcare staff's access needs with stringent security and confidentiality requirements mandated by regulations like HIPAA, HIPAA, and accreditation standards. At All Pine Medical Center, Dr. Palmer and his team’s desire for single sign-on access to patient records illuminates the tension between usability and security compliance, which is crucial for safeguarding sensitive health information.

One potential solution is implementing Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) that grants physicians like Dr. Palmer broader access while maintaining security. This approach assigns specific permissions based on user roles, ensuring that users access only necessary information. The advantage of RBAC is streamlined workflows and reduced login times, which enhance efficiency. However, it poses a risk if permissions are not finely tuned, which could accidentally expose sensitive data (Saria, 2020). To minimize this, strict role definitions and periodic audits are vital.

A second solution involves integrating Single Sign-On (SSO) systems that authenticate users once for multiple applications, eliminating the need for multiple logins. An SSO system improves user convenience and can be configured to incorporate strong authentication measures, such as two-factor authentication, balancing ease of access and security (Hwang & Wang, 2019). Nevertheless, implementing SSO requires significant infrastructure investments and rigorous security protocols. A breach in the SSO system could compromise all connected systems, increasing the potential attack surface (Jain et al., 2021).

The third option entails policy modifications to allow physician override permissions within existing security frameworks. This would involve establishing strict oversight and audit trails for any elevated access, ensuring accountability. While this approach is easier to implement technically, it raises concerns regarding compliance, as overrides could lead to access violations and potential legal ramifications if not properly monitored (Raghupathi & Raghupathi, 2014). It requires a clear policy and supervisory oversight to prevent misuse.

In selecting the best solution, integrating SSO combined with enhanced role-based permissions appears most suitable. This hybrid approach ensures that physicians like Dr. Palmer enjoy seamless access while maintaining security controls. SSO simplifies user experience, reducing frustration, and when paired with role-specific permissions, the system can restrict access appropriately. This method complies with regulatory requirements and improves operational efficiency, which aligns with the hospital’s goal of providing swift access without compromising security (Dey et al., 2019).

In conclusion, hospitals must navigate complex security, usability, and compliance factors. By adopting a robust SSO system coupled with strict role-based access controls, healthcare institutions can balance need-to-know access with confidentiality. This solution supports both clinical productivity and regulatory adherence, ensuring that patient data remains protected without impeding healthcare delivery (Adler-Milstein & Jha, 2017).

References

• Adler-Milstein, J., & Jha, AK. (2017). Hospital electronic health record adoption and clinical efficiency. Health Affairs, 36(3), 521-527.
• Dey, A., Yen, P.-Y., & Reddy, C. K. (2019). A review of the use of authentication protocols in EHR systems. Journal of Medical Systems, 43(4), 92.
• Hwang, J., & Wang, H. (2019). Improving healthcare data security with integrated SSO systems. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 3(2), 123–132.
• Jain, A., Singh, A., & Kumar, R. (2021). Security challenges in single sign-on implementations for healthcare systems. Computers & Security, 102, 102155.
• Raghupathi, W., & Raghupathi, V. (2014). Social and ethical implications of health information technology. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 10, 1-7.
• Saria, S. (2020). Role-based access control in electronic health records: Challenges and solutions. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 108, 103491.