To-Do List: Continue To Obtain, Read, Summarize, And Evaluat

To Do List Continue To Obtain Read Summarize And Evaluate Relevant

To do list: Continue to obtain, read, summarize, and evaluate relevant sources. Review feedback on first draft. Write your second draft. By class time on March 8th, submit your draft to Turnitin Draft 2 to fix issues before uploading it to Canvas. Submit draft to the Second Draft assignment link in Canvas. Upload all sources (the actual articles) used in the second draft in the Sources assignment link in the Research Paper section of Canvas. Save each source as a PDF named according to the author's last names and year (e.g., Baxter_Bosson_2006). If a source is read but not used, it does not need to be uploaded. If no electronic copy exists, a paper copy must be submitted. Seek feedback on your draft from BrainFuse or a writing tutor in the CTL. In the second draft, revise the Introduction and add the literature review sections of relevant sub-disciplines. Ensure all content is in your own words or quoted with page numbers. Keep plagiarism out of your draft. Schedule regular writing times. The second draft must include a Title Page, Revised Introduction, Literature Review sections for each sub-discipline, and References. Write at least 10-12 pages (~3600 words) with 10-12 sources following APA style. The literature review should cover: 1) review relevant literature in sub-discipline A with thematic structure, define terms, critique literature, and summarize themes; 2) review relevant literature in sub-discipline B with similar structure; 3) discuss the integration of sub-disciplines A and B, including themes from integration, inconsistencies, gaps, and relevance to your proposed social program or research project.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of developing a comprehensive research paper involves multiple stages, including extensive research, drafting, and revision. The assignment detailed emphasizes the importance of ongoing source collection, critical reading, and synthesis of relevant literature across multiple disciplines. Initially, students must continue to seek out pertinent academic sources, read them carefully, and summarize their core ideas. Analyzing these sources critically helps to identify main themes, define necessary terms, and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses within the literature. Feedback on the first draft is crucial for refining the work and preparing a well-structured second draft, which should be submitted by the specified deadline, ensuring proper use of Turnitin to check for originality and uploading specific articles used in the paper. Proper documentation of sources, whether as PDFs or physical copies, is essential to maintain academic integrity and facilitate accurate referencing.

The subsequent stage involves crafting the second draft, focusing on improving and expanding specific sections: the Introduction and Literature Review. The literature review must encompass multiple sub-disciplines relevant to the research topic, employing thematic rather than article-by-article synthesis. Each sub-discipline's review requires defining key terms, critiquing existing research, and summarizing predominant themes. Moreover, integrating insights from different disciplines is vital to demonstrate interdisciplinary understanding and to identify gaps or contradictions that highlight the novelty or necessity of the proposed research or social program.

This comprehensive draft, expected to span approximately 3,600 words, should be meticulously formatted according to APA standards, include a detailed reference list, and be built through consistent, scheduled writing efforts. The goal is to produce a cohesive, well-substantiated document that clearly communicates existing research, highlights areas needing further exploration, and aligns with academic integrity standards, setting a robust foundation for subsequent revisions and final submission.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage publications.
• Galvan, J. L., & Galvan, M. C. (2017). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences. Routledge.
• Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination. Sage Publications.
• Locke, L. F., Silverman, S. J., & Spirduso, W. W. (2014). Reading and understanding research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. Sage Publications.
• Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press.
• University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. (2021). Writing center: Conducting a literature review. https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/literature-reviews/
• Wallace, M., & Wray, A. (2016). Critical reading and writing for postgraduates. Sage Publications.