To Increase The Possibility Of Earning Full Credit

To Increase The Possibility Of You Earning Full Credit For Weekly Part

To increase the possibility of you earning full credit for weekly participation, you must: participate individually with meaningful and original comments in the dialogue of the posted discussion questions; make an initial response that is at least 200 words long and addresses all aspects of the discussion prompt; make meaningful responses to at least two of your peers’ posts; ensure your posted content is written in your own words; cite properly and consistently and include all sources used for your responses. The deadline for submission of the initial post in a discussion is 11:59pm ET on Sunday unless stated otherwise. All responses to peers are due by Tuesday. You must participate in the classroom discussions before the stated deadline to receive credit.

Paper For Above instruction

Participation in academic discussions enhances understanding and engagement with course material, but achieving full credit requires adherence to specific guidelines. These guidelines aim to ensure meaningful contribution, proper citation, and timely participation, all of which foster a productive learning environment. First, students must craft individual comments that are original and substantive, demonstrating critical thinking and reflection on the discussion prompts. An initial post should be at least 200 words, sufficiently addressing all parts of the question or topic. This length ensures depth of analysis and avoids superficial responses.

Furthermore, engaging with peers through responses to at least two other posts promotes dialogue and reinforces learning. These responses should be meaningful, offering insights, affirmation, or constructive critique, rather than mere agreement or repetitions. Importantly, all contributions must be in the student's own words to uphold academic integrity. Repetition of content, copying from sources, or paraphrasing without proper citation not only diminishes the discussion quality but also risks academic penalties.

Citations are crucial in academic discussions. Proper referencing of all sources—whether from credible peer-reviewed journals, textbooks, or reputable websites—is mandatory. This practice not only supports claims but also models scholarly discipline. The initial post must be submitted by 11:59 pm ET on Sunday, with responses to peers completed by Tuesday, ensuring timely engagement. Missing either deadline can result in loss of credit, emphasizing the importance of punctual participation.

Overall, these participation standards cultivate a respectful, thoughtful, and academically rigorous online environment. They prepare students for professional and scholarly communication by emphasizing originality, critical reflection, and scholarly responsibility. Consistently applying these guidelines can enhance learning outcomes and foster a vibrant academic community.

References

  • Brown, N., et al. (Year). Perspectives: an open invitation to cultural anthropology.
  • eldwood, R. (2014). Do mirrors reflect reality in agonistic encounters? A test of mutual cooperation in displays. Animal Behavior.
  • Just Russian. (2018). Russian superstitions. Retrieved from https://example.com
  • Futures Without Violence. (n.d.). The Facts on Violence Against American Indian/Alaskan Native Women.
  • Jerue, T. (n.d.). Alaska update: Sexual assault in Alaska requires immediate attention. Welcome | NIWRC.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Data on violence against Alaska Native women.
  • Additional peer-reviewed journal articles and credible sources pertinent to anthropology and supply chain management can be included here.