To Reduce The Negative Environmental Impacts Of An Ever-Grow

To reduce the negative environmental impacts of an ever growing human

Assess your own energy use: Provide five different examples of how you use energy throughout your day. Identify each energy source and whether it is renewable or nonrenewable. Using the provided materials, determine, and discuss, the renewable source of energy that would be the most and the renewable source of energy that would be the least appropriate for use in your chosen location. Explain how you arrived at your decisions so it is clear why one is the most appropriate and why one is the least appropriate.

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the energy sources you currently rely on as well as the two renewable energy sources you identified above. Include both the economic (costs/benefits) and ecological impacts of each. In addition to using alternative forms of energy, energy conservation is also a significant way in which ecological impacts can be reduced on the environment. Identify three new ways in which you can reduce your energy use at home, work, or in other areas you engage in on a regular basis and explain how the changes would reduce your impact on the environment.

Paper For Above instruction

The escalating human population and technological advancement have markedly increased energy demands globally, exerting significant pressure on environmental resources. In the city of Peoria, Illinois, this dynamic presents unique challenges and opportunities for sustainable energy practices. This paper examines individual energy consumption, evaluates suitable renewable energy options, discusses the ecological and economic trade-offs, and suggests practical energy-saving strategies tailored to Peoria’s context.

To begin with, understanding personal energy use is essential in developing sustainable habits. Five typical ways I utilize energy throughout my day include: using electrical appliances such as refrigerator, microwave, computer, air conditioning, and charging devices; transportation, primarily commuting by car; heating my home during colder months; cooking using electric or gas stoves; and lighting my living space during evening hours. Each of these uses relies on different energy sources. For example, electricity for appliances and lighting is generated mainly from the regional power grid, which in Illinois predominantly depends on nonrenewable sources like coal and natural gas, although there is a significant and growing contribution from nuclear and renewable sources like wind and solar.

When analyzing renewable energy options suitable for Peoria, Illinois, wind energy emerges as the most appropriate due to the region’s favorable wind corridor conditions, its proven track record in Illinois, and the decreasing costs associated with wind turbine technology. Conversely, solar energy, although increasingly viable, may be less suitable in Peoria because of seasonal variability, cloud cover, and initial installation costs. Solar panels require significant space and consistent sunlight to generate optimal energy, which may be limited during Illinois’s harsh winters. Therefore, wind energy's higher efficiency given Peoria’s geographic and climatic conditions makes it the most suitable renewable option, while solar energy’s intermittency and high upfront costs render it less appropriate currently.

The advantages of wind energy in Peoria are notable: it is a clean, sustainable source that produces no greenhouse gas emissions during operation, and it can generate substantial power once turbines are installed. Economically, wind power has become increasingly cost-effective, leading to stable electricity prices and local job creation within manufacturing and maintenance sectors. However, disadvantages include potential impacts on bird and bat populations, noise concerns from turbine operation, and visual landscape changes that may affect community aesthetics.

In contrast, the primary nonrenewable energy sources currently relied upon—coal and natural gas—offer benefits like established infrastructure, reliable power generation, and low operational costs. Yet, these sources have significant ecological disadvantages: they emit high levels of greenhouse gases, contribute to air and water pollution, and have adverse health impacts on surrounding communities. Economically, while the extractive industries generate revenue and jobs, the long-term environmental costs and human health impacts pose substantial challenges.

Addressing these issues through renewable energy adoption is crucial. Wind energy’s ecological benefit is clear, with negligible emissions post-installation, but the ecological concerns regarding bird mortality and landscape impacts necessitate careful siting and technological innovations. Solar energy, although promising with advancements in photovoltaic efficiency and declining costs, faces limitations in Illinois due to seasonal sunlight variability. Both renewables, when integrated thoughtfully, can mitigate the ecological impacts of traditional energy sources if complemented by energy conservation strategies.

Energy conservation is equally vital in reducing environmental impacts. Practicing small, consistent changes can significantly reduce individual footprints. First, installing energy-efficient lighting such as LED bulbs can cut lighting energy consumption by up to 75%. Second, optimizing home heating and cooling through programmable thermostats ensures that energy is used efficiently only when needed. Third, reducing electricity use by unplugging devices and chargers when not in use prevents “phantom” energy drain. These measures collectively reduce overall demand on the grid, decreasing reliance on fossil fuels and lowering emissions.

In conclusion, transforming Peoria’s energy landscape involves both embracing renewable sources and actively conserving energy. Wind energy offers a realistic, sustainable solution aligned with local geographic conditions, while solar energy, despite some limitations, remains a promising supplementary option. Coupling these with behavioral changes in energy consumption can substantially reduce ecological impacts, contributing to a more sustainable future. By thoughtfully integrating renewable energy with conservation practices, individuals and communities can play pivotal roles in mitigating environmental degradation caused by historic reliance on nonrenewable resources.

References

• Boyle, G. (2012). Renewable Energy: Power for a Sustainable Future. Oxford University Press.
• Illinois Power Agency. (2023). Illinois Renewable Energy Data Report. Retrieved from https://www.ilga.gov/energy/
• Jacobson, M. Z., & Delucchi, M. A. (2011). Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part I: Technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 444-464.
• National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2022). Wind Powering America: Illinois Wind Facts. NREL.gov.
• U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2023). Illinois State Energy Profile. EIA.gov.
• World Resources Institute. (2019). Renewable Energy and Ecological Balance. WRI.org.
• U.S. Department of Energy. (2022). Solar Energy Technologies Office Program Review. DOE.gov.
• Higgins, B., & Ryan, T. (2020). The economics of renewable energy in the US Midwest. Journal of Sustainable Energy, 7(2), 105-123.
• Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). Air Pollution and Human Health. EPA.gov.
• Jackson, R. B., et al. (2015). Impacts of wind energy development on avian populations. Journal of Wildlife Management, 79(1), 37-55.