Tommy Gunn Is A Division Manager For K Cern Inc A Small Phar

Tommy Gunn Is A Division Manager For K Cern Inc A Small Pharmaceutic

Tommy Gunn is a division manager for K-Cern Inc., a small pharmaceutical company. He recently learned that the company's drug candidate, after passing the final clinical trial, received government approval for sale, which is expected to significantly increase the company's revenues and stock price. Recognizing the potential for financial gain, Tommy considers investing in the company's stock before the public announcement. However, K-Cern has a strict policy against insider trading, forbidding employees from purchasing company stock outside of authorized plans. To bypass this rule, Tommy asks his father to buy the stock on his behalf, with the understanding that they will share the profits. This action raises questions about the ethicality of Tommy’s behavior, as it involves trading on non-public, material information through a familial intermediary, which constitutes insider trading and violates both ethical standards and legal regulations.

Paper For Above instruction

The ethical analysis of Tommy Gunn’s actions concerning insider trading involves understanding the principles of honesty, fairness, and compliance with legal standards. Insider trading—using confidential, material information not available to the public to make investment decisions—is widely recognized as unethical because it violates the principles of fair markets and equal information access. From the perspective of professional ethics in finance and business, maintaining integrity and transparency is paramount, and engaging in transactions based on non-public information compromises these principles.

Tommy’s decision to seek his father’s assistance in purchasing stock before the public announcement exploits privileged information for personal financial gain. Such behavior undermines trust in financial markets, distorts fair competition, and can lead to legal repercussions, including substantial fines and imprisonment. The fact that Tommy’s actions involve family members further complicates the ethical issues, as it aims to conceal the true source of the trade and circumvent company policies against insider trading. This reliance on familial intermediaries intensifies the ethical breach by attempting to mask the illicit activity, highlighting a deliberate intent to deceive.

The ethical standards articulated by professional bodies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the CFA Institute emphasize the importance of adhering to rules designed to promote fairness and transparency. The SEC’s regulations explicitly prohibit trading on material non-public information and impose strict penalties for violations. Similarly, the CFA Institute’s Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct assert that members should not exploit their position or confidential information for personal benefit. Tommy’s actions contravene these standards, making them ethically indefensible regardless of whether any legal consequences ensue.

From an ethical standpoint, the principle of duty to stakeholders—including shareholders, employees, regulators, and the public—must be considered. Insider trading erodes market integrity and damages investor confidence. It confers an unfair advantage to those with access to privileged information, thereby violating fundamental principles of justice and equality. Ethical decision-making would require Tommy to refrain from acting upon or facilitating access to non-public information for personal gain and to comply strictly with company policies and legal statutes.

Furthermore, considering the broader ethical implications, such actions can have a ripple effect by undermining societal trust in capital markets and corporate governance. When individuals prioritize personal gain over legal and ethical standards, it fosters a culture of misconduct that can permeate organizational practices, discouraging ethical behavior among employees and stakeholders. Organizations must foster ethical climates that discourage insider trading through rigorous policies, training, and enforcement to prevent such violations.

Therefore, Tommy Gunn’s actions are ethically inappropriate because they violate the principles of honesty, fairness, and legal compliance. Engaging in insider trading, even indirectly through family members, compromises integrity and violates the expectations of professional and societal standards. Upholding ethical standards requires rejecting schemes designed to exploit confidential information for personal financial benefit, promoting transparency and fairness in financial transactions.

Switching focus to the second scenario involving Rodgers Industries, ethical conduct encompasses honesty and transparency in financial reporting practices. The internal audit identified a significant internal control failure, which the company's management, led by CFO Josh McCoy, chose to conceal from external auditors and the public. Josh’s decision to instruct Todd Barleywine to hide the internal control issue and to issue a misleading management report is deeply unethical, as it involves deliberately withholding material information, thereby misleading shareholders, regulators, and the investing public.

Ethical behavior in financial reporting mandates full disclosure of material internal control deficiencies to ensure stakeholders have accurate information for decision-making. Concealing such issues undermines the integrity of the financial statements and violates professional standards established by organizations such as the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) and the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). These standards emphasize the importance of transparency, accountability, and adherence to applicable laws and regulations.

Josh’s actions breach the fundamental ethical principles of honesty and integrity. By opting to hide the internal control failure, he actively deceives external auditors and misleads investors and regulators, potentially exposing the company to legal penalties and reputational damage. Such dishonesty compromises the trust placed in management and violates ethical codes that professionals are expected to uphold.

Furthermore, ethical guidelines require that management promptly correct internal control issues and disclose material weaknesses to uphold the principles of fairness and responsible corporate governance. Transparent reporting ensures that investors and regulators can assess the financial health and operational risks of the company accurately. Concealment may temporarily inflate the company’s perceived internal controls but ultimately leads to more severe consequences if the deficiencies are later uncovered, including regulatory sanctions and loss of stakeholder trust.

In this context, Josh McCoy’s behavior was unethical because it involved intentional deception and failure to adhere to principles of honesty and full disclosure. Ethical leadership entails promoting a culture of transparency, responsibility, and compliance with applicable laws and standards. Proper ethical conduct would have involved reporting the internal control issues to external auditors, addressing the deficiencies transparently, and taking corrective actions in a manner consistent with regulatory and professional standards.

In conclusion, both scenarios exemplify breaches of ethical standards—Tommy Gunn’s participation in insider trading and Josh McCoy’s concealment of internal control failures—highlighting the importance of integrity, transparency, and adherence to legal and professional guidelines. Upholding these principles not only aligns with ethical obligations but also sustains trust in organizational and financial systems, which is essential for the functioning of capital markets and corporate governance.

References

• Associated Press. (2021). Insider Trading. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/
• CFA Institute. (2014). CFA Institute Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct. CFA Institute.
• Institute of Internal Auditors. (2017). International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards). IIA.
• Messier, W. F., Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2019). Auditing & Assurance Services. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Rittenberg, L., & Tkachenko, A. (2018). Financial Accounting. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Schmidt, R. (2019). Corporate Governance and Ethics. Routledge.
• U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2015). Internal Control Management and Evaluation. GAO.
• Walther, B., & Ness, D. (2020). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision-Making & Cases. Cengage Learning.
• Williams, J. D., & Marquardt, C. (2017). Ethical Decision-Making in Business. Business & Society Journal.
• Yip, R. W. (2018). Principles of Financial Regulation. Oxford University Press.