Topologies Please Respond To The Following Per The Text Netw
Topologiesplease Respond To The Followingper The Text Network Topo
Topologiesplease Respond To The Followingper The Text Network Topo
"Topologies" Please respond to the following: Per the text, network topologies are defined both physically and logically. Suppose you had to implement either a full-mesh topology or start topology network on a university campus that has ten (10) buildings. Determine the topology that would you select. Provide two (2) reasons for your choice. Imagine that you work for a small company with one hundred (100) computers that are not on a network.
Your boss comes to you for advice on whether he should implement either a peer-to-peer or client / server network. Recommend one (1) solution for your boss. Justify your recommendation with at least three (3) advantages that your choice would afford over the network that you did not choose.
Paper For Above instruction
Implementing an effective network topology and structure is fundamental to the operational efficiency and scalability of organizational networks. In the context of a university campus with ten (10) buildings and a small business with 100 standalone computers, selecting the appropriate topology or network type aligns with operational needs, security considerations, and scalability.
Selecting a Network Topology for a University Campus
When considering the implementation of either a full-mesh or start topology for a university's network connecting ten (10) buildings, the full-mesh topology emerges as the more suitable choice. The full-mesh topology involves every building connecting directly to every other building, creating a robust network with multiple pathways for data transmission.
Reasons for Choosing Full-Mesh Topology
Firstly, the full-mesh topology provides high reliability and redundancy. Since each building has multiple dedicated connections to every other building, the failure of a single link does not disrupt the overall network connectivity. This is crucial for a university environment where continuous access to resources across all campuses is essential for academic and administrative functions.
Secondly, the full-mesh topology offers superior data transfer speeds and low latency. Direct point-to-point connections between buildings facilitate faster communication, which is vital for bandwidth-intensive applications, large data transfers, and real-time collaboration among students and staff.
While the full-mesh topology delivers these advantages, it is important to note that the implementation cost and complexity can be higher due to the number of connections required. However, for a campus environment prioritizing reliability and performance, these trade-offs are justified.
Choosing a Network Structure for a Small Business
For a small company with 100 computers that are not currently networked, the decision between peer-to-peer and client/server architecture is critical. A peer-to-peer network would connect each computer directly, allowing resource sharing but lacking centralized management.
I recommend implementing a client/server network. This structure involves dedicated servers managing network resources, security, and data storage.
Advantages of Client/Server Network
Firstly, centralized management simplifies tasks such as data backup, security updates, and user account management. This central control reduces administrative overhead and improves security, as policies can be enforced uniformly across all client machines.
Secondly, scalability is easier with client/server architecture. As the company grows, additional servers or upgrades can accommodate increased load or new services, unlike peer-to-peer networks that become inefficient with larger numbers of devices.
Thirdly, enhanced security is achievable in client/server networks through centralized authentication and authorization processes, reducing the risk of unauthorized access. This is especially critical for protecting sensitive business data.
Additionally, specialized resources, such as shared printers and applications, can be seamlessly integrated and managed within a client/server environment, increasing operational efficiency.
Comparison of Both Approaches
The peer-to-peer network, while simple and cost-effective initially for small setups, presents limitations including difficulty in managing security and resources as the network scales. Conversely, the client/server network provides robustness, easier management, and better security, which are crucial as the business expands and demands more complex information systems.
Conclusion
In summary, for the university campus, a full-mesh topology offers reliability and speed despite higher costs, making it suitable for an environment where continuous operation is critical. For the small business, a client/server architecture is advisable due to its centralized management, scalability, and enhanced security features, ensuring the network can grow with the organization’s needs.
References
Cisco. (2020). Network Topologies and Types. Cisco Press.
Kurose, J., & Ross, K. (2017). Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (7th ed.). Pearson.
Tanenbaum, A. S., & Wetherall, D. J. (2011). Computer Networks (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Odom, W. (2008). CCNA ICND1 640-822 Official Cert Guide. Cisco Press.
Stallings, W. (2018). Data and Computer Communications (10th ed.). Pearson.
LaRoche, T. (2019). Network Security Essentials. Elsevier.
Gupta, P., & Madaan, A. (2021). Modern Network Architectures. Journal of Computer Networks and Communications.
Peterson, L. L., & Davie, B. S. (2017). Computer Networks: A Systems Approach. Morgan Kaufmann.
Zhou, J., & Zhang, H. (2020). Practical Guide to Network Design and Implementation. Wiley.
Andrew, S. (2015). Network Management and Security. Springer.