Total 300 Words Discussion 200 Words Reply To Peer Discussio
Total 300 Words Discussion 200 Words Reply To Peer Discussion Pos
• Total 300 words discussion + 200 words reply to peer discussion post • Plagiarism Check • Provide link to resources Select four people currently in the media and discuss their exertion of one of the sources of power. Students must cover all four of the sources of power discussed on page 263 of your textbook. Negotiation, Lewicki, Barry, & Sanders, McGraw -Hill, 7th Edition (2015) ISBN Apply only one source of power to each of the four people selected.
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment requires students to analyze four individuals currently in the media and discuss how each exerts one of the four sources of power as outlined on page 263 of the textbook "Negotiation" by Lewicki, Barry, & Sanders (2015). Each individual should be associated with a unique source of power, ensuring that all four sources from the chapter—possibly including legitimate power, reward power, coercive power, and expert power—are represented across the selected people. The analysis should include a detailed description of how each person's actions or influence reflect their specific source of power, supported by current media examples.
Additionally, the task involves composing a total of 300 words discussing these four individuals. The reply to a peer discussion should be approximately 200 words, offering a thoughtful engagement or critique of the initial post. The discussion must be free of plagiarism, verified through a plagiarism check, and include references to credible resources, with direct links provided to support claims. The use of proper APA citations is necessary to acknowledge source material.
This assignment emphasizes application of theoretical concepts from the textbook to real-world media figures, demonstrating understanding of power dynamics in negotiations and influence. The analysis should be concise yet comprehensive, offering insights into how media personalities exercise different types of power in their leadership, persuasion, or influence strategies.
References should be accurately formatted, including the textbook and any additional credible sources referenced in the discussion. This exercise aims to develop critical thinking regarding power dynamics and enhance students' ability to connect textbook theory with current media scenarios through clear, well-structured writing.
References
Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Sanders, D. M. (2015). Negotiation (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The Bases of Social Power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power. University of Michigan.
Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and Practice (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Maxwell, J. C. (2007). The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership. Thomas Nelson.
Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership That Gets Results. Harvard Business Review.
Kelley, R., & Thibaut, J. (1969). Social Psychology of Groups. Wiley.
Bass, B. M. (1990). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press.
Olson, M., & Zanna, M. (1993). Attitudes and attitude change. In W. D. Shore & J. P. Olson (Eds.), Social psychology (pp. 137-161). McGraw-Hill.
Raven, B. H. (2008). The bases of power and the power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8(1), 1–22.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications.