Training Programs: Select One Of The Companies That Forbes C

Training Programselect One Of The Companies That Forbes Considers A Sm

Choose one of the companies that Forbes considers a small giant—companies that prioritize quality, community, and a strong company culture over rapid growth. For this analysis, we will assume that the selected company operates within the Chicago metro area. The focus of this project is to design a comprehensive training program aimed at developing the skills of human resource managers or hiring managers to conduct more effective interviews with job applicants. The primary goal is to enhance their interviewing techniques to better identify suitable candidates and improve the overall hiring process. This includes conducting a needs assessment, defining clear learning objectives, considering diverse learning styles, selecting appropriate delivery modes, budgeting, implementing engagement strategies, tailoring content to various roles, establishing timelines, communicating the training availability, and evaluating the program's effectiveness, all grounded in the principles outlined in Fundamentals of Human Resource Management (Fifth Edition).

Paper For Above Instruction

Successful hiring is critical to the growth and sustainability of small giants—companies that emphasize purpose, community engagement, and quality over sheer size (Rashid & Azmi, 2017). In a competitive labor market, especially in dynamic regions like Chicago, effective interviewing is essential for selecting candidates who align with the company's core values and long-term vision. To ensure the human resource managers and hiring managers are equipped with the necessary skills, a tailored training program must be developed, starting with a thorough needs assessment.

Needs Assessment and Learning Objectives

The first step in developing an effective training program involves conducting a needs assessment to identify gaps in existing interviewing skills among hiring personnel. Indicators suggesting the necessity for training include high turnover rates, inconsistent candidate evaluation, prolonged hiring processes, or feedback indicating that interviews do not effectively assess candidate potential (Pandey & Singh, 2014). Additionally, observations of interview inconsistencies and performance evaluations can reveal skill gaps in behavioral interviewing techniques.

Based on these indicators, the following three learning objectives are formulated:

1. Participants will be able to identify and apply structured behavioral interview techniques to better assess candidate competencies.
2. Participants will develop skills to recognize and minimize unconscious biases during interviews.
3. Participants will learn how to formulate relevant, job-specific interview questions aligned with the company's culture and values.

Consideration of Learning Styles

The training program must accommodate various learning styles such as visual, auditory, kinesthetic, and read/write preferences (Kolb, 2014). Visual learners benefit from slides, charts, and videos; auditory learners grasp concepts more effectively through discussions and audio content; kinesthetic learners prefer interactive activities like role-playing; and read/write learners best engage with manuals and written exercises. Incorporating diverse instructional methods ensures all participants can engage meaningfully with the content and retain critical interviewing skills.

Delivery Mode

Considering the diverse learning styles and the need for flexibility, a blended training approach is recommended. This includes:

• Classroom workshops for interactive role-playing, group discussions, and scenario analysis.
• Online modules for theoretical content, accessible at participants’ convenience.
• Job shadowing opportunities where participants observe experienced interviewers in real scenarios.

This multimodal strategy enhances engagement and caters to different learning preferences, leading to better skill acquisition and retention (Noe, 2017).

Budget Development

Developing an effective training program requires detailed budgeting. Internal trainer costs include preparation, delivery, and follow-up sessions. Assuming an internal trainer's hourly rate of $50 for approximately 20 hours of preparation and delivery, the internal training cost would be around $1,000. If an external trainer is contracted, the average fee ranges from $2,000 to $5,000 depending on experience and session length. Material development costs, including manuals, slides, and online platform subscriptions, are estimated at $1,000. Total costs are summarized as follows:

• Internal trainer: $1,000
• External trainer (optional): $3,500 (average)
• Material development: $1,000
• Online platform subscription: $500
• Contingency (10%): $600

Total estimated budget (using internal trainer): approximately $3,100. If outsourcing to external trainers, costs could be around $6,600.

Training Delivery Style

The training will primarily be instructor-led, involving classroom sessions facilitated by experienced HR professionals. Discussions, role-plays, and case studies will be integral to the sessions, encouraging active participation. Self-paced online modules will supplement instructor-led sessions, allowing flexibility. Activities such as mock interviews, peer feedback sessions, and group problem-solving exercises will enhance learning engagement and practical application (Werner et al., 2018).

Audience

Participants will include HR managers, hiring managers from various departments such as accounting, marketing, operations, and other staff involved in recruitment. Recognizing their diverse backgrounds, the training will be tailored with contextual examples relevant to each department to ensure applicability. For example, accounting staff can focus on assessing numerical reasoning, while marketing staff may practice evaluating creativity and communication skills. Customized content ensures relevance and enhances motivation to apply new skills (Schmidt & Hunter, 2014).

Content and Duration

The core content will cover interview preparation, question formulation, behavioral interview techniques, bias mitigation strategies, legal considerations, and post-interview evaluation. The training is designed to be delivered over two full days or four half-day sessions, totaling approximately 12 hours, to accommodate depth without overwhelming participants. The sessions will include lectures, interactive activities, role-playing, and reflective exercises.

Development Timelines

The development of the training program, including content creation, material design, and platform setup, is estimated to take approximately 8 weeks. This timeline allows for content review, pilot testing, and adjustments based on feedback, ensuring a high-quality program that is ready for implementation within two months.

Communication Strategy

Clear communication channels are essential to maximize participation and engagement. A multi-channel approach will be used, including email announcements, company intranet postings, and team meetings. Emphasizing how the training aligns with company values and its impact on career development will motivate staff to participate. Additionally, testimonials from previous trainees and success stories can reinforce the relevance and benefits of the program (Robinson & Judge, 2019).

Evaluation of Training Effectiveness

Evaluating the program's success involves pre- and post-training assessments, participant feedback, and practical application evaluation. Participants will complete self-assessment questionnaires to measure confidence levels before and after the training. Supervisors will observe interview performance post-training, and metrics such as improved candidate quality, reduced time-to-hire, and higher interview success rates will be analyzed. The evaluation should align with the three learning objectives to determine the extent to which participants have acquired targeted skills (Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2006).

In conclusion, designing a comprehensive interview training program for small giant companies in Chicago involves careful needs assessment, flexible delivery modes, relevant content, clear communication, and robust evaluation. These elements collectively ensure that hiring managers are better equipped to select candidates who will contribute positively to the company's mission and culture, thereby fostering long-term success and community value.

References

• Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Pearson Education.
• Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Noe, R. A. (2017). Employee Training and Development (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Pandey, S., & Singh, D. (2014). Human resource management: Concepts and practice. PHI Learning.
• Robinson, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
• Rashid, A., & Azmi, R. (2017). Small giants: Companies that prioritize community and culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(4), 615-629.
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 262–274.
• Werner, J. M., Lyle, M. J., & DeSimone, R. L. (2018). Human Resource Development (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.