Treatment Of Psychiatric Emergencies In Children Versus Adul ✓ Solved

Treatment Of Psychiatric Emergencies In Children Versus Adultsthe Diag

The diagnosis of psychiatric emergencies can include a wide range of problems—from serious drug reactions to abuse and suicidal ideation/behaviors. Regardless of care setting, the PMHNP must know how to address emergencies, coordinate care with other members of the health care team and law enforcement officials (when indicated), and effectively communicate with family members who are often overwhelmed in emergency situations. In this discussion, you compare treatment of adult psychiatric emergency clients to child or adolescent psychiatric emergency clients.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Psychiatric emergencies necessitate prompt and effective interventions to prevent deterioration and ensure safety. While the core principles of managing psychiatric crises remain consistent across age groups, there are significant differences in approach when dealing with adults versus children and adolescents. This essay explores these distinctions by examining a hypothetical case of a psychiatric emergency in an adult patient and contrasting it with the treatment considerations necessary for a pediatric client. Additionally, it discusses the legal and ethical issues associated with treating minors during psychiatric emergencies.

Case Description of an Adult Psychiatric Emergency

Consider an adult male in his early thirties presenting to the emergency department with acute suicidal ideation accompanied by a plan and intent. The patient has a history of major depressive disorder and reports recent job loss, social isolation, and feelings of hopelessness. Upon assessment, the clinician finds the patient to be actively suicidal with a high risk of self-harm. Immediate management involves ensuring safety through a risk assessment, removing access to means, and instituting close observation. Pharmacotherapy may be initiated to address underlying symptoms, along with crisis intervention and supportive therapy. Hospitalization might be necessary for stabilization, with a multidisciplinary team developing a safety plan and arranging follow-up care.

Differences in Treatment for Children and Adolescents

If this same patient were a child or adolescent, treatment approaches would differ significantly. Developmental considerations are paramount; children may lack the cognitive maturity to fully comprehend their situation, and their ability to communicate feelings and thoughts can be limited. Assessment would focus more heavily on family involvement, developmental history, and environmental factors. In pediatric cases, a family-centered approach is essential, often involving child protective services if abuse is suspected or if the environment poses a threat to the child's safety.

Pharmacological interventions also differ; medication decisions are made cautiously due to the ongoing development and potential side effects in younger clients. Non-pharmacological therapies such as play therapy or behavioral interventions might be prioritized. Moreover, the environment and care setting should be adapted to be age-appropriate, providing a less intimidating atmosphere for children or adolescents. The goal is to stabilize the crisis while addressing underlying issues in a manner suitable for the young person's developmental stage.

Legal and Ethical Considerations

Treating minors in psychiatric emergencies involves additional legal and ethical challenges. Consent and confidentiality are complex issues; unlike adults who can provide informed consent, minors typically require parental or guardian approval. However, in urgent situations where delay could jeopardize safety—such as imminent suicide risk—therapeutic intervention may be authorized under emergency doctrine laws that permit treatment without explicit consent, respecting the child's best interests.

Ethically, clinicians must balance respect for autonomy with beneficence, ensuring the child's safety while fostering trust. The use of involuntary hospitalization or restraint raises ethical questions about coercion versus protection. Laws such as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and the laws governing minors' rights to confidential mental health treatment also influence clinical decisions. PMHNPs must be familiar with state statutes and institutional policies governing emergency psychiatric care for children and adolescents to navigate these complexities appropriately.

Conclusion

The management of psychiatric emergencies must be tailored to the patient's age, developmental stage, and specific needs. While adults may be capable of participating actively in their treatment decisions, children and adolescents require a more nuanced approach that includes family involvement and careful consideration of legal and ethical frameworks. Effective emergency psychiatric care for both groups hinges on comprehensive assessment, age-appropriate interventions, and adherence to legal statutes designed to protect vulnerable populations. By understanding these differences, healthcare providers can deliver compassionate, safe, and legally compliant emergency psychiatric care tailored to each individual's unique circumstances.

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
• Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
• Thapar, A., Pine, D. S., Leckman, J. F., Scott, S., Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, E. A. (2015). Rutter’s child and adolescent psychiatry (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
• American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. (2018). Practice parameter for emergency mental health services for children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 57(10), 658–674.
• Guttmacher, L. M., & Arnett, P. T. (2011). Legal and ethical issues in child and adolescent mental health. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 20(4), 573–586.
• Nolan, M., & Flynn, S. (2014). Ethical considerations in pediatric mental health treatment. International Journal of Child and Adolescent Health, 7(2), 125–138.
• American Psychiatric Association. (2019). Guidelines for psychiatric crisis intervention. Washington, DC: APA Publishing.
• Levine, J., & Robertson, P. (2017). Pharmacologic management of suicidal adolescents. Current Psychiatry Reports, 19(9), 66.
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2016). Confidentiality of mental health records for minors. HHS.gov. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov
• Kalb, L. G. (2014). Ethical issues in pediatric psychiatric care. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 29(4), 371–374.