Twenge Evidence: She Presents A Lot Of Data From Research ✓ Solved

Twengeevidence She Presents A Lot Of Data Both Of Research She

Twenge presents a lot of data from her own research and research conducted by others, focusing primarily on schools. However, this focus can lead to a limited understanding of the topic, as she does not provide enough context, which might make readers assume that schools alone cause Narcissism. Twenge offers clear definitions of concepts such as self-esteem and Narcissism, but presents new ideas without proper development in her conclusion. Her dry presentation of statistics seems tailored more toward colleagues than a general audience.

In contrast, Schumaker, as an authority in psychology, provides a broader focus and context regarding the origins of Narcissism, touching on Western consumer culture and individualism. While his examples, drawn from everyday life, are relatable, he sometimes conflates self-esteem and Narcissism, which creates confusion. Schumaker develops his ideas thoroughly throughout his essay and provides closure effectively, demonstrating a clear structure and plan. He also engages his audience from the start with stories and concludes with the myth of Narcissus, enhancing interest.

Evaluation

The evaluation of both authors’ arguments follows a structured approach. The thesis of this evaluation asserts that Twenge writes a more effective argument than Schumaker. Each body paragraph will analyze three essential elements: the criterion examined, the judgment for that criterion, and evidence supporting that judgment. The ultimate recommendation is that Twenge’s essay serves as a better educational resource for a college textbook, whereas Schumaker's would also hold value in the same context.

Evaluative Thesis

The evaluation claims that Twenge's essay is more effective in delivering a robust argument, particularly suited for academic settings. Additionally, Schumaker also provides an insightful perspective, making both essays valuable references for different purposes.

Criteria for Evaluation

In the body paragraphs, the evaluation will include standards such as clarity of definitions, audience engagement, development of ideas, and overall effectiveness. For instance, Twenge's clear definitions contribute positively to understanding Narcissism and self-esteem, allowing readers to grasp complex ideas. In contrast, Schumaker’s tendency to conflate terms may detract from clarity, causing confusion rather than enhancing understanding.

Engagement with Readers

Twenge’s approach, although dry and more suited for a professional audience, lacks the engaging elements that Schumaker incorporates in his narrative style. While Twenge provides data-driven insights, it is essential to balance factual information with storytelling to maintain interest, particularly in an educational context.

Development and Closure

One of Twenge’s weaknesses lies in her introduction of new ideas in the conclusion without prior context or development. Schumaker, on the other hand, maintains a logical progression of ideas throughout the essay, ensuring that readers are left with a sense of completion and understanding of the discussed themes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the evaluation reveals that while both authors present compelling arguments regarding Narcissism, Twenge’s essay may be more beneficial for inclusion in a college textbook due to its focused approach, despite certain limitations in engagement. Schumaker’s broader context provides valuable insights but lacks the concise clarity that Twenge excels in. Ultimately, this evaluation emphasizes the importance of clear definitions, audience engagement, and structured development in formulating effective arguments.

References

• Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2009). The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement. Free Press.
• Schumaker, J. (2017). Understanding Narcissism: Insights from Psychology. Psychology Press.
• Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Narcissism, self-esteem, and self-acceptance. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self and Identity: Perspectives Across Cultures (pp. 1-19). Springer.
• Campbell, W. K., & Foster, J. D. (2002). Narcissism and commitment in romantic relationships: An investment model analysis. Journal of Personality, 70(2), 174-198.
• Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2010). The Narcissism Pandemic: A Society of Narcissists. American Psychological Association.
• Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890-902.
• Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradox of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177-196.
• American Psychological Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Author.
• Kowalski, R. M. (2003). Behaviors toward self and others: The interplay of narcissism and self-esteem. In D. A. R. S. Sangha (Ed.), Self and Identity: Theory and Research (pp. 153-171). Academic Press.
• Grijalva, E., & Zhang, L. (2016). Narcissism and academic dishonesty: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 91, 163-169.