Two College Graduates Recently Joined The Same Major News Pa

Two college graduates recently joined the same major newspaper as

This is a take-home exam designed to assess your understanding and application of course concepts. You are encouraged to use your textbook, class notes, and relevant materials to construct your responses. The exam consists of multiple questions that cover chapters 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 11, focusing on psychological and organizational theories relevant to workplace behavior and management.

Ensure that your responses are in full sentences, clearly address all aspects of each question, and are written in your own words to avoid plagiarism. You may refer to course materials for definitions and concepts, but your answers should demonstrate your understanding and integration of the material. The responses can be 2-3 pages in total, and submission is required in a Word document format by the deadline. Proper formatting and clarity are essential.

Paper For Above instruction

In contemporary organizational environments, understanding individual responses to job stressors is crucial for maintaining productivity and employee well-being. The scenario involving two journalists, both working under similar stressful conditions, exemplifies how individual differences in psychological resilience, coping mechanisms, and perceptions influence their reactions to workplace stress. The first journalist's fatigue and despondency suggest insufficient coping strategies, possibly overwhelmed by the high demands and tight deadlines. Conversely, the second journalist's ability to enjoy the challenges indicates better stress management, possibly associated with higher self-efficacy or adaptive coping skills.

Applying the stress model from Chapter 4, it becomes clear that personal appraisal and available social support play vital roles. The first journalist may perceive the stressors as overwhelming, leading to burnout, while the second may interpret them as challenges conducive to professional growth. To mitigate negative stress reactions, the employer can implement interventions such as workload management, providing mental health resources, promoting work-life balance, and fostering a supportive organizational culture that encourages open communication about stressors. Training in stress management techniques and resilience building can also empower employees to better handle high-pressure situations.

Another critical factor is organizational support, which can buffer the adverse effects of stress. Regular feedback, recognition of effort, and ensuring a manageable workload are essential strategies. These interventions are consistent with the transactional model of stress and coping, emphasizing the importance of individual perceptions and organizational resources in shaping stress responses.

Moving to the issue of perceived inequity among service representatives, equity theory (Chapter 5) elucidates that workers evaluate their inputs and outcomes relative to others. In this scenario, the new hire earning $3,000 above the usual starting salary, while established reps earned significantly more despite similar roles, creates a perception of inequity. The existing employees likely perceive their higher inputs (experience, tenure, effort) are not matched by their outcomes (salary), leading to feelings of unfairness. Such perceptions can engender reduced motivation, job satisfaction, and increased turnover intentions.

Feelings of inequity can also provoke social comparisons, resentment, or efforts to restore balance—either by reducing effort or seeking adjustments. To address these issues, management could ensure transparent communication regarding salary structures, recognize the contributions of experienced employees, and consider equitable reward systems that reflect both tenure and performance. Fostering a perception of fairness is vital for maintaining morale and team cohesion.

Regarding the redesign of Fast Tire Company's production facilities around a team-based system, the choice between individual and team incentives depends on several factors. These include the nature of the tasks, interdependence among employees, the organizational culture, and whether individual efforts are easily measurable. For highly collaborative tasks, team rewards may promote cooperation, whereas individual incentives may be more effective in roles with clear, quantifiable outputs.

To enhance reward effectiveness, regardless of the reward type, organizations should ensure that incentives are perceived as fair and attainable. Clear criteria for performance measurement, consistent application, and linking rewards to meaningful outcomes foster motivation. Recognition programs, feedback mechanisms, and opportunities for personal growth also reinforce the desired behaviors and performance standards.

Turning to escalation of commitment, two prominent causes from Chapter 7 include cognitive biases such as the sunk-cost fallacy and overconfidence. The sunk-cost fallacy causes individuals or organizations to continue investing in failing projects because of prior investments, rather than rational decision-making. For example, a company may keep funding a failing product line because of large marketing investments already made, thus escalating commitment despite clear signs of failure.

Overconfidence, another cause, can lead decision-makers to overestimate their ability to succeed, resulting in continued investment in risky ventures. For instance, a startup founder might persist with a product despite market evidence suggesting poor demand, believing their innovation will eventually succeed. Both causes underscore how psychological biases drive escalation and highlight the importance of objective reassessment and decision audits.

In terms of communication technology, introducing email in a multi-building company offers benefits such as rapid information dissemination and record-keeping, fostering faster decision-making. However, potential problems include information overload—where employees may feel overwhelmed by excessive messages—and misunderstandings due to lack of non-verbal cues. To supplement email, other communication mediums like face-to-face meetings, video conferencing, and collaborative platforms (e.g., Slack, Microsoft Teams) can facilitate clearer and more nuanced interactions, especially for complex or sensitive issues.

Conflict within organizations can be classified as negative, which hampers collaboration, or constructive, which fosters innovation and problem-solving. Constructive conflict is characterized by open communication, mutual respect, and focus on issues rather than personalities. In contrast, relationship conflict involves personal incompatibilities and emotional antagonism. For example, a structural source of conflict I experienced involved overlapping responsibilities between departments leading to role ambiguity, which created friction and hindered workflow. Structural conflicts can be managed through clear role definitions, improved communication protocols, and organizational restructuring.

Finally, sources of power in organizations—such as legitimate power derived from position and expert power based on knowledge—are vital for guiding behavior and decision-making. Power facilitates organizational effectiveness by enabling leaders to influence and motivate employees, ensure compliance, and implement strategies effectively. Understanding and ethically exercising power is essential for fostering a positive and productive organizational climate.

References

• Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In Appley, M. H. (Ed.), Adaptation level theory. Academic Press.
• Greenberg, J. (2011). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1577–1606.
• Higgins, E. T. (1998). Regulating self-evaluation processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(4), 1038–1054.
• Latham, G. P. (2007). Leadership and motivation in organizations. In G. P. Latham (Ed.), Building a motivated workforce. Routledge.
• Luthans, F. (2015). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Nickell, S., & Layard, R. (1999). Labour market institutions and unemployment: A critical review. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics (Vol. 3). Elsevier.
• Roberts, K. H., & Porras, J. I. (1999). Teams in organizations: A review of literature. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(3), 259–283.
• Schriesheim, C. A., & Neider, L. L. (1989). Power and influence research: A historical perspective. Journal of Management, 15(4), 735–752.
• Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.
• Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations. Pearson Education.