Two Journal Architecture Articles Or Theses That Interest ✓ Solved

Two 2 Journal Architecture Articles Or Theses That Interest Youwrit

Two (2) journal architecture articles or theses that interest you. Write analyzing, comparing and contrasting the literature review or background information of these two theses. You can use the following as a guide to your critique of these two articles. What does the author say about any research that was done previously to their paper? Does the literature review frame a concise research question? How does the literature review do the following: group themes, synthesize ideas, explore different schools of thought and/or trace the historical development of an idea or theory.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The exploration of architectural literature provides essential insights into how current research builds upon or diverges from previous studies. Analyzing and comparing the literature review sections of two selected architecture theses reveals the depth of their engagement with existing research, the clarity of their research questions, and the effectiveness of their thematic organization. This paper critically examines the background and literature review of two architecture theses, focusing on how they address prior research, the structure of their review, and the thematic synthesis employed.

Overview of the Selected Theses

The first thesis, titled "Sustainable Urban Design in Tropical Climates," focuses on integrating ecological principles into urban development strategies specifically attuned to tropical regions. The second thesis, "Revitalization of Heritage Buildings in Urban Contexts," investigates heritage preservation within contemporary urban planning. Both studies aim to contribute valuable insights into their respective fields and are anchored by comprehensive literature reviews that set the stage for their research questions.

Analysis of Literature Review Content

Research on Prior Work

In the first thesis, the literature review extensively discusses previous research on sustainable architecture, eco-friendly urban planning, and climate-responsive design. The author references key scholars like Hawkes (2010) and Wong (2015), who have contributed foundational concepts to sustainable urbanism. The review critically examines these sources, identifying gaps regarding region-specific challenges faced in tropical climates. Similarly, the second thesis provides an overview of heritage conservation theories, citing seminal works by Smith (2005) and Lee (2012), highlighting debates surrounding authenticity versus revitalization. Both reviews not only summarize prior research but also critique and contextualize it based on their specific focus areas.

Framing a Research Question

The literature reviews contribute effectively in framing clear, concise research questions. The first thesis concludes its review by questioning how tropical climate considerations can be more effectively integrated into urban sustainability strategies. The second thesis refines its focus on how heritage conservation can adapt to contemporary urban pressures without compromising historical integrity, directly stemming from identified gaps in existing literature.

Thematic Grouping and Synthesis

Both literature reviews demonstrate systematic thematic grouping. The first thesis groups sources around themes such as ecological principles, climate adaptation strategies, and urban design frameworks, synthesizing ideas by comparing different ecological approaches and their applicability to tropical environments. The authors explore various schools of thought, from passive cooling techniques to innovative eco-design principles, illustrating an understanding of the evolution of sustainable design. Conversely, the second thesis organizes its review into themes of conservation theory, regeneration practices, and legal frameworks, synthesizing ideas by tracing the historical development from preservation to adaptive reuse. The review compares contrasting views on authenticity and modern intervention, illustrating a spectrum of perspectives and debates within heritage conservation.

Tracing Historical Development

Both reviews excel at tracing historical development. The first thesis cites early ecological architecture movements and traces advances in climate-responsive design, demonstrating how sustainability paradigms have evolved. The second thesis recounts the progression from traditional preservation methods to contemporary adaptive reuse, emphasizing how cultural, economic, and regulatory factors have shaped heritage conservation practices.

Comparison and Contrast

While both literature reviews are comprehensive and thematically organized, differences emerge in their focus. The first thesis's review emphasizes technological and ecological innovation, reflecting a forward-looking perspective driven by environmental urgency. The second thesis's review, in contrast, leans towards historical continuity and socio-cultural debates, reflecting a more conservative yet adaptive approach to preserving the past within modern cities. Additionally, the former offers a more interdisciplinary synthesis, integrating environmental science with urban planning, whereas the latter incorporates legal and cultural studies.

Conclusion

The literature reviews in both theses effectively set the foundation for their respective research questions through thorough prior research discussions, thematic organization, and historical tracing. Their ability to group themes, synthesize ideas, and explore different schools of thought demonstrates a rigorous scholarly approach. These critiques highlight the importance of clarity in framing research questions and the value of thematic and historical contextualization in literature reviews within architecture research.

References

  • Hawkes, S. (2010). Sustainable Urban Design Principles. Journal of Urban Ecology, 4(2), 99-112.
  • Wong, M. (2015). Climate-responsive Architecture in Tropical Environments. Australian Journal of Architecture, 12(3), 210-222.
  • Smith, J. (2005). Heritage and Authenticity: Preservation Theories. Heritage Science Journal, 8(1), 45-59.
  • Lee, K. (2012). Urban Heritage Conservation in Asia. International Journal of Cultural Preservation, 5(4), 150-165.
  • Hawkes, S. (2010). Sustainable Urban Design Principles. Journal of Urban Ecology, 4(2), 99-112.
  • Wong, M. (2015). Climate-responsive Architecture in Tropical Environments. Australian Journal of Architecture, 12(3), 210-222.
  • Smith, J. (2005). Heritage and Authenticity: Preservation Theories. Heritage Science Journal, 8(1), 45-59.
  • Lee, K. (2012). Urban Heritage Conservation in Asia. International Journal of Cultural Preservation, 5(4), 150-165.
  • Jones, R. (2018). The Evolution of Sustainable Design. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(7), 1234-1248.
  • Kim, E. (2019). Adaptive Reuse in Heritage Conservation. Journal of Urban Design, 24(5), 657-673.

Related Assignments