U8d1 64 Application Of T Tests For This Discussion Identify

U8d1 64 Application Of T Testsfor This Discussion Identify A Resea

Identify a research question from your professional life or career specialization that can be addressed by an independent samples t test. Indicate why a t test would be appropriate for this research question. Describe the variables and their scale of measurement. Discuss the expected outcome, such as "The Group 1 mean score will be significantly greater than the Group 2 mean score because."

Paper For Above instruction

In the realm of professional and academic research, the independent samples t test serves as a crucial statistical tool used to compare the means of two independent groups. This paper explores a specific research question pertinent to my career in healthcare management, demonstrating the application of the independent samples t test, its rationale, relevant variables, and anticipated outcomes.

Research Question

The research question I have formulated is: "Is there a significant difference in patient satisfaction scores between patients treated by two different nurse staffing models in a hospital?" This question aims to evaluate whether the implementation of alternative staffing strategies impacts patient perceptions of care quality.

Rationale for Using an Independent Samples t Test

The independent samples t test is appropriate for this research question because it compares the mean satisfaction scores between two distinct, independent groups — patients treated under two different staffing models. These groups are independent because the satisfaction scores of patients in one staffing model do not influence or overlap with those in the other. Given the continuous nature of satisfaction scores and the intention to determine if a statistically significant difference exists between the two groups, the t test provides a suitable inferential approach.

Moreover, the t test can handle the comparison even with moderate sample sizes, assuming normal distribution and homogeneity of variances, which are typical conditions in healthcare research settings. This method is favored over alternatives like Chi-square tests because it maintains sensitivity to mean differences in continuous outcome variables.

Variables and Measurement Scale

The key variable in this study is patient satisfaction score, measured on a Likert-scale-based survey instrument. Typically, these satisfaction scores are quantified on a scale from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. The scale is considered interval because the difference between scores is presumed to be consistent across the range, allowing for mean comparisons. The grouping variable differentiates patients based on the staffing model they experienced — Group 1 for patients under staffing model A, and Group 2 for staffing model B.

Thus, the independent variable is the staffing model, which is categorical and nominal, with two levels. The dependent variable, patient satisfaction score, is continuous and interval-scaled, suitable for t-test analysis.

Expected Outcome

It is hypothesized that patients managed under staffing model A will report higher satisfaction scores than those under staffing model B. Specifically, the expected outcome is: "The mean satisfaction score for Group 1 will be significantly greater than that of Group 2 because staffing model A provides more personalized care, leading to higher patient perceptions of quality."

This hypothesis presumes an effect of staffing policy on patient perception, with the expectation that improved staffing conditions correlate with enhanced patient experiences.

Anticipated results will support whether the differences in mean scores are statistically significant based on the p-value obtained from the t test. A p-value less than 0.05 would indicate a meaningful difference between groups, corroborating the hypothesis.

Furthermore, calculating the effect size, such as Cohen's d, will provide insight into the practical significance of the findings, beyond mere statistical significance. A larger effect size would underscore a substantial difference attributable to staffing models, influencing policy decisions in healthcare settings.

Conclusion

Utilizing the independent samples t test in this context effectively facilitates the comparison of the two staffing models concerning patient satisfaction outcomes. This statistical approach aligns with the data's nature, the research question, and the objectives of assess­ing operational practices in healthcare management. By rigorously analyzing satisfaction scores and considering assumptions like normality and homogeneity of variances, valid and actionable conclusions can be drawn. Ultimately, such analysis supports evidence-based resource allocation and staffing decisions, enhancing patient care quality.

References

  • Warner, R. M. (2013). Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
  • Laerd Statistics. (2019). Independent samples t-test using SPSS Statistics. https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-guides/independent-samples-t-test-in-spss-statistics.php
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • IBM Corporation. (2023). IBM SPSS Statistics predictive analytics techniques. https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics
  • Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. A., & Leech, N. L. (2017). Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis. Routledge.
  • Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2014). IBM SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation. Sage Publications.
  • Cook, R. D., & Weisberg, S. (1983). Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78(382), 349-356.
  • Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall.