Understanding The Relationship Between Two Quantitative Vari

Understanding The Relationship Between Two Quantitative Variables Is O

Understanding the relationship between two quantitative variables is often needed in epidemiology and biostatistics. For example, a researcher might need to know the relationship between birth and death rates. Think of an example that's interesting to you that concerns the relationship between two quantitative variables. Describe the issue and clearly identify the observational units and the two quantitative variables. How could you illustrate this with a scatterplot? Finally, if a scatterplot revealed a strong association, is this sufficient statistical evidence to show cause and effect? Explain your response. should have at least 200 words (not including references)

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding the relationship between two quantitative variables is fundamental in epidemiology and biostatistics to identify potential associations that may influence public health interventions. For instance, consider an observational study examining the relationship between physical activity levels and body mass index (BMI) among adults. The observational units in this case are individual adults, each with recorded measures of weekly physical activity (measured in hours) and their BMI (kg/m²). The primary objective is to understand whether increased physical activity correlates with lower BMI.

The two quantitative variables are therefore physical activity (independent variable) and BMI (dependent variable). To illustrate this relationship, a scatterplot can be used, plotting physical activity levels on the x-axis and BMI on the y-axis. Each point on the scatterplot represents one adult's physical activity and BMI. If the data points trend downward, it suggests an inverse relationship indicating that higher physical activity levels are associated with lower BMI.

However, observing a strong association on a scatterplot does not imply causation. Correlation does not establish causal relationships because of potential confounders, reverse causality, and bias. For example, individuals with higher BMI might reduce physical activity due to discomfort or health issues, or other variables such as diet, socioeconomic status, or genetic factors might influence both variables. Therefore, strong association demonstrated visually is suggestive but not conclusive for causation.

To establish causality, rigorous study designs like randomized controlled trials are necessary, controlling for confounders. Statistical methods such as regression analysis can help adjust for confounding variables, but they still cannot definitively prove causality in observational studies. Hence, while scatterplots can be useful for detecting associations, causation requires a broader set of evidence.

In conclusion, visual evidence of a strong association between two variables is compelling but insufficient by itself to establish cause-and-effect relationships. Researchers must employ appropriate study designs and statistical analyses to infer causality from observed correlations.

References

  • Fletcher, R. H., Fletcher, S. W., & Wagner, E. H. (2014). Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., & Muller, K. E. (1988). Epidemiologic research: Principles and quantitative methods. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Vittinghoff, E., Glidden, D. V., Shiboski, S. C., & McCulloch, C. E. (2011). Regression Methods in Biostatistics. Springer.
  • Schisterman, E. F., Vanky, E., & Louis, J. P. (2010). Causality in epidemiologic studies. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 64(4), 275–280.
  • Greenland, S. (2003). Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature. Epidemiology, 14(3), 261–272.
  • Harrel, F. E. (2015). Regression Modeling Strategies. Springer.
  • Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge University Press.
  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Winship, C., & Morgan, S. L. (1999). The estimation of causal effects from observational data. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 659–706.

Related Assignments