Unit 5 Db: Justifiable Suicide Americans Are Living Longer T

Unit 5 Db Justifiable Suicideamericans Are Living Longer Than Ever Be

Americans are living longer than ever before, often facing chronic pain and suffering that may diminish the quality of life. In some cases, individuals such as Admiral Nimitz and his wife have chosen to end their lives while still of sound mind, raising the question of whether suicide can be morally justified under such circumstances. This essay explores the moral considerations surrounding suicide, examining whether individuals have an obligation to continue living and, if so, where that obligation originates. It also considers whether suffering in old age or other contexts can justify assisted suicide or euthanasia.

The morality of suicide is a complex issue rooted in philosophical, religious, and ethical debates. On one hand, some argue that life is a fundamental value, and individuals have a moral obligation to preserve it regardless of suffering. On the other hand, proponents of individual autonomy assert that persons have the right to determine their own death, especially when prolonged suffering significantly diminishes their quality of life. The debate often hinges on whether life has intrinsic value independent of personal circumstances and whether suffering can or should override the desire for death.

Those who believe individuals have an obligation to continue living often derive this obligation from various moral frameworks. Religious perspectives, such as Christianity, emphasize the sanctity of life, asserting that life is a divine gift that humans are obliged to preserve unless specific circumstances justify ending it. Secular ethical theories, like Kantian morality, suggest that humans have a duty to respect the inherent dignity of themselves and others, which can be interpreted as a moral duty to preserve life unless there are compelling reasons otherwise.

Furthermore, some argue that obligations toward others—such as family, community, and society—bind individuals to continue living in order to fulfill responsibilities, contribute to societal well-being, or avoid potential harm caused by death. From this viewpoint, the obligation is owed to oneself as part of one's moral duty to preserve life and to others who depend on or value one's presence.

Conversely, if one accepts that suffering in old age can justify suicide, then the moral boundaries of this justification must be examined carefully. For example, some argue that assisted dying is permissible when an individual endures unmanageable pain, incurable illness, or loss of dignity. Such positions are often supported by the principles of autonomy and compassion, emphasizing personal choice and relief from suffering. Countries like the Netherlands and Canada have legal frameworks allowing euthanasia and assisted suicide under specific criteria, reflecting this perspective.

This raises further questions about other contexts where suicide might be morally justifiable. For instance, terminal illness with imminent death, relentless pain, or irreversible loss of mental capacity could be circumstances where ending life becomes a compassionate choice. Conversely, situations involving mental health struggles, coercion, or a desire to escape temporary distress may challenge the legitimacy of such decisions, emphasizing the need for careful assessment and ethical safeguards.

Ultimately, the debate over justifiable suicide balances respect for personal autonomy with societal and moral obligations to preserve life. While recognizing individual rights to choose death in certain circumstances, society must also consider the broader implications of endorsing euthanasia and assisted suicide, including potential slides into slippery slopes that could undermine the value of life universally.

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Chochinov, H. M., & Breitbart, W. (2011). Dignity in the terminally ill. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 41(4), 571–575.
• Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Mary Gregor, 1997. Cambridge University Press.
• Légal, T., & Bertram, C. (2016). Euthanasia and assisted dying: A global perspective. International Journal of Law and Medicine, 30(2), 147–158.
• Overgaard, G. (2015). Autonomy and the morality of assisted dying. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 40(3), 242–254.
• Speziale, S., & Carpenter, D. R. (2018). Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Imperative. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
• Sumner, P. (2013). Morality and the value of life. Cambridge University Press.
• Williams, B. (1973). Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press.
• World Health Organization. (2015). Palliative care. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-care