Unit 8: This Assignment Has 2 Parts—A Discussion And A Proje ✓ Solved

Unit 8this Assignment Has 2 Parts A Discussion And A Project

Discuss the value of qualitative inquiry in validating knowledge claims in psychology research. Reflect on how your proposed dissertation topic is being formulated considering qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methodologies. Identify potential hurdles or barriers to your research and consider how finding a content expert may influence your research plans. Additionally, review at least 10 empirical articles relevant to your dissertation field, annotate key points, and decide which sources to include in your literature review and RefWorks list. Finally, revise your draft of ten strategic points for your dissertation, incorporating instructor feedback, and ensure these points are aligned, clear, and feasible for your research.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Qualitative inquiry has historically been underutilized in psychological research, which traditionally emphasized quantitative methods. However, qualitative research offers unique and invaluable insights into human behavior, experiences, and perceptions, contributing significantly to the validation of knowledge claims in psychology (Morse, 2006). This paper explores the importance of qualitative inquiry, discusses the formulation of a dissertation research approach, addresses potential barriers, and reflects on strategies for effective literature review and research planning.

The Value of Qualitative Inquiry in Psychology

Qualitative research's primary strength lies in its ability to provide rich, contextualized understanding of complex phenomena (Gergen, 2014). While quantitative methods excel at testing hypotheses through numerical data, qualitative approaches facilitate exploration of subjective experiences, cultural factors, and social dynamics that underpin human behavior (Vertz, 2014). This depth of understanding enhances the credibility and robustness of psychological knowledge claims by allowing researchers to verify phenomena from multiple perspectives (Gergen et al., 2015). For instance, phenomenological studies can elucidate individuals' lived experiences, adding depth to theories that are primarily grounded in quantitative data.

Furthermore, qualitative inquiry promotes an iterative process of inquiry, where findings guide subsequent data collection, enriching the research process (Morse, 2006). This flexibility is particularly valuable when exploring novel or poorly understood phenomena, as it allows researchers to adapt to emerging insights and complexities that rigid quantitative designs may overlook or oversimplify.

Formulating a Dissertation Approach

Based on the course content, my current dissertation approach integrates qualitative methodology to explore the lived experiences of caregivers dealing with chronic illness. I aim to conduct in-depth interviews, a characteristic qualitative approach, to gather nuanced insights into their emotional and psychological challenges. I recognize the importance of combining this with quantitative measures, such as standardized scales, to triangulate data and strengthen evidence (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2017). This mixed-methods approach ensures a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon, aligning with best practices in qualitative inquiry.

Addressing Barriers in Research

Potential hurdles include obtaining access to participants, ensuring data saturation, and maintaining researcher objectivity during data collection and analysis. Ethical considerations, such as preserving participant confidentiality and managing emotional distress, are paramount. Additionally, challenges in coding and interpreting qualitative data require rigorous training and reflective practices to ensure validity and reliability (Braun & Clarke, 2021). Securing institutional approval and funding may also pose logistical barriers, necessitating clear articulation of the study’s significance and methodological rigor.

The Influence of Content Experts

Finding content experts will guide the refinement of research questions, ensure methodological appropriateness, and contribute to the validation of findings. Their insights can help identify gaps in the literature and suggest theoretical frameworks that align with the research focus. Collaborating with experts enhances the credibility of the research process and outcomes, fostering a robust and defensible dissertation.

Literature Review and Source Annotations

For my literature review, I identified ten empirical articles from reputable journals examining qualitative methods in human sciences. Each source was annotated for its key findings and relevance, with the most pertinent included in my RefWorks list. This ongoing review process keeps my research grounded in current scholarship and reveals gaps that my study can address.

Revising Strategic Points

Building upon instructor feedback, I revised my ten strategic points to clarify research aims, methodology, and feasibility. This iterative process aligns my research plan with academic standards, ensures coherence among the points, and supports the overall goal of conducting valid, valuable dissertation research. I am committed to continuous reflection and refinement throughout my doctoral journey to maintain alignment with emerging insights and scholarly expectations.

Conclusion

Qualitative inquiry plays a critical role in enriching psychological knowledge by capturing the depth of human experiences that quantitative data alone may overlook. By carefully formulating a mixed-methods approach, addressing potential barriers, and leveraging expert insights, researchers can produce credible and meaningful contributions to the field. Ongoing literature review and strategic planning are vital to the success of the dissertation, ensuring that the research is relevant, rigorous, and impactful.

References

• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
• Gergen, K. J. (2014). Pursuing excellence in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Psychology, 1(1), 49-60. doi:10.1037/qup
• Gergen, K. J., Josselson, R., & Freeman, M. (2015). The promises of qualitative inquiry. American Psychologist, 70(1), 1-9. doi:10.1037/a
• Morse, J. M. (2006). Insight, inference, evidence, and verification: Creating a legitimate discipline. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1-7.
• Vertz, F. J. (2014). Qualitative inquiry in the history of psychology. Qualitative Psychology, 1(1), 4-16. doi:10.1037/qup