Unlike Other Advanced Presidential Democracies, The United S ✓ Solved

Unlike other advanced presidential democracies, the United States does not directly elect its chief executive. The election of the president is a seminal debate in American politics; in modern times, the Electoral College has come under increased scrutiny following the 2000 election which saw Democratic nominee Al Gore win the popular vote yet lose to Republican nominee George W. Bush. More recently, the Electoral College has been challenged by the emergence of the National Popular Vote (NPV) compact, which would require signatory states to award their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote regardless if that candidate won the popular vote within the state. (For example: Texas would have awarded its electoral votes in 2012 to Obama under NPV despite Obama losing the popular vote in Texas.) While critics argue the Electoral College is inherently anti-democratic, supporters are much more likely to argue that the Electoral College provides a necessary check on the masses (e.g. preventing a demagogue from being elected), while also challenging the notion that the presidential election is meant to be popular (i.e. directly elected by voters).

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The American presidential election system stands out among democracies worldwide due to its unique reliance on the Electoral College rather than a direct popular vote. This system has sparked extensive debate concerning its democratic legitimacy, effectiveness, and potential for reform. While critics highlight its drawbacks in undermining the principle of one person, one vote, supporters argue it offers protective checks and balances that sustain federalism and prevent populist surges. This paper defends the Electoral College as a critical component of the U.S. political structure, emphasizing its role in safeguarding against tyranny of the majority, maintaining federalism, and stabilizing presidential elections.

To understand the necessity of the Electoral College, one must recognize its foundation in the constitutional compromise during the founding of the United States. The framers devised the Electoral College to balance the influence of populous states with that of smaller ones, thus ensuring no single region could dominate presidential elections. This structure embodies the federalist principle enshrined in the Constitution, respecting states’ sovereignty and preventing aggregation of power at the national level (Fiorina, 2005). Critics often contend that it distorts the democratic process by allowing a candidate to win electoral votes without winning the national popular vote; however, supporters see it as a safeguard against purely populist candidates whose support may be geographically concentrated and not reflective of national consensus (Wonnacott, 2012). This balance maintains stability by requiring candidates to garner broad regional support, thereby promoting consensus rather than narrow, regional victories.

Additionally, the Electoral College's role as a check on the "mob rule" is significant. By distilling the democratic choice through a process involving electors, it acts as an institutional safeguard that filters direct public influence, potentially preventing demagogues or reckless populists from ascending to power. For example, the electoral mechanism can mitigate the influence of rapid swings in public opinion driven by temporary political fads or misinformation, thus providing stability and continuity (Niemi & Weisberg, 2001). Furthermore, electors historically have exercised discretion, offering a further layer of deliberation that ensures candidate fitness beyond mere popular appeal. While recent trends depict more strict adherence to state vote outcomes, the original intent continues to underpin its utility in fostering a measured selection process.

Reforming or abolishing the Electoral College would require significant constitutional amendments, which are inherently challenging in the American political system. However, proponents of reform argue that initiatives like the National Popular Vote (NPV) compact could align the electoral outcome more closely with the will of the majority without requiring constitutional amendments (Gerken, 2008). Such reform efforts aim to preserve federal elements by only altering how electoral votes are allocated rather than removing the electoral process entirely. Nonetheless, critics of the NPV warn that it may undermine the federalist balance and lead to increased influence of highly populous states, thereby marginalizing smaller states and rural communities (Kollman & Referendum, 2007). Maintaining the Electoral College’s structure, therefore, supports the preservation of federalism, while reforms can improve accessibility and fairness without dismantling its core principles.

In conclusion, the Electoral College remains a vital element of the U.S. presidential election process, embodying constitutional compromises designed to balance regional interests, prevent populist upheavals, and maintain federalism. While imperfect, its role in promoting stability and balanced representation justifies its continued use. Rather than outright abolition, reforms such as the National Popular Vote compact offer avenues to refine the system, making it more democratic while respecting federal principles. The preservation and thoughtful reform of the Electoral College are essential to maintaining the integrity, stability, and federal character of American presidential elections.

References

• Fiorina, M. P. (2005). Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. Pearson.
• Gerken, H. K. (2008). The new propia: Reinventing the Electoral College. Harvard Law Review, 121(8), 2112-2143.
• Kollman, K., & Referendum, J. (2007). The Political Dynamics of Electoral Reform. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 400-414.
• Niemi, R. G., & Weisberg, H. F. (2001). State of the Parties. Routledge.
• Wonnacott, R. (2012). The Electoral College and the Politics of the American Presidency. Political Science Quarterly, 127(3), 415-436.