Use At Least One Software Construction Technique And Associa

Use at least 1 software construction technique and associated tool to perform the changes to the APIs in the application recommended in the Week 3 part of the project

The final phase of the Software Reengineering Project involves implementing the planned modifications to the application's API to enhance its functionality, reliability, and maintainability. This task requires applying specific software construction techniques and utilizing appropriate development tools to carry out these changes effectively. These modifications are based on the analysis and evaluations conducted during earlier phases, particularly the API evaluation in Week 2 and the improvements identified in Week 3.

To accomplish this, the primary goal is to select and utilize at least one software construction technique—such as refactoring, modularization, or interface adaptation—and couple it with suitable tools like integrated development environments (IDEs), version control systems, or API management platforms. For instance, if refactoring is chosen, tools like JetBrains ReSharper, Eclipse refactoring tools, or Visual Studio Refactorings can be employed to streamline and improve the API codebase. This process involves systematically modifying the existing source code to improve structure and readability without altering its external behavior, thus aligning with the project’s objectives of increasing API efficiency, reliability, and maintainability.

The implementation process should involve a detailed analysis of the current API code, identification of the specific areas for improvement, and the application of the selected construction technique to create cleaner, more efficient API interfaces. Careful testing during and after these modifications is essential to ensure that behaviors remain consistent and that the enhancements are effectively realized. The changes should be documented comprehensively, including a description of the selected technique, the tools used, and the rationale behind these choices.

Subsequently, a revised version of the Software Reengineering Project document must be prepared, incorporating the following updates: an updated title page with the current date, revisions to previously completed sections based on feedback, and a new section describing the recent modifications. This section must detail the modifications made to the API, the specific construction technique employed, the tools used, and an assessment of how these changes improve the application. The final document should present a cohesive report that integrates all weekly topics, culminating in a comprehensive overview of the project process, challenges encountered, solutions implemented, and the outcomes achieved.

The application files—including source code and executable files—must be bundled into a single ZIP archive for submission. This comprehensive package ensures that reviewers have all necessary components to verify and reproduce the modifications. Prior to submission, conduct a thorough review of the entire project documentation to ensure clarity, consistency, and cohesiveness. Address any instructor or peer feedback appropriately, and ensure the final version of the report supports confident future work based on the recommended changes.

Paper For Above instruction

In the final phase of the Software Reengineering Project, effectively modifying the application’s API is crucial to enhancing its performance, maintainability, and overall quality. This process involves applying at least one identified software construction technique, supported by suitable tools, to implement the planned improvements derived from earlier project phases. The chosen technique serves as a systematic approach to restructuring or refining the existing codebase, ensuring that the API aligns with best practices and project goals.

One effective construction technique for sound API modification is refactoring, which involves restructuring existing code without changing its external behavior to improve code clarity, reduce complexity, and facilitate easier maintenance. Tools such as Eclipse's refactoring features, IntelliJ IDEA's refactoring capabilities, or Visual Studio's refactorings can significantly streamline this process by enabling safe and efficient code modifications. Applying these tools allows for renaming variables and methods, extracting functions, and reorganizing classes in a manner that enhances the API's efficiency and readability.

The process begins with a thorough review of the current API code, identifying areas prone to redundancy, poor modularity, or inefficiencies. Using the selected construction technique, these areas are systematically modified—such as encapsulating repetitive code into functions, isolating complex logic into well-defined modules, or updating deprecated interface elements. Throughout this process, the use of version control systems like Git ensures that changes are tracked, reversible if necessary, and well-documented.

Testing is an integral part of this phase, encompassing unit testing of individual API components, integration testing of interconnected modules, and regression testing to verify that new modifications haven't introduced unintended issues. Automated testing frameworks, such as JUnit or pytest, can expedite this process and improve confidence in the stability of changes.

The improvements achieved through these modifications should be carefully documented. This documentation includes a description of the construction technique, reasons for choosing it, the specific tools employed, and a comparative analysis of the API’s performance, reliability, and maintainability pre- and post-modification. This detailed record supports future maintenance efforts and demonstrates the effectiveness of the applied techniques.

The updated project document must integrate these changes into the overall narrative, providing a cohesive storyline that relates the specific technical interventions to the overall project objectives. The document should include an updated title page with the current date, revisions to previous sections reflecting instructor feedback, and a new dedicated section illustrating the recent modifications.

Furthermore, the entire set of application files—including source code and executable files—should be packaged into a ZIP archive and submitted for review. This comprehensive submission ensures that the project's technical aspects are transparent and reproducible. Conducting a final review of the report ensures coherence among the weekly topics and clarity in conveying the project's revisions, ultimately providing a solid foundation for subsequent development or maintenance efforts.

References

• Fowler, M. (2018). Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley.
• Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1994). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley.
• Beck, K. (2002). Test-Driven Development: By Example. Addison-Wesley.
• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
• Martin, R. C. (2008). Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship. Prentice Hall.
• Pressman, R. S. (2014). Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. McGraw-Hill Education.
• RapidAPI. (2023). API Development and Management. Retrieved from https://rapidapi.com
• IBM. (2020). API Management and Microservices. IBM Cloud Documentation.
• Omar, S., & Abolhassani, A. (2021). Enhancing API Quality through Refactoring Techniques. Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development, 9(2), 1-15.
• ISO/IEC 25010:2011. Systems and Software Engineering — Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) — System and Software Quality Models.