Use Of Electronic Health Records (EHR) Is Wide

The Use Of Electronic Health Records (EHR) Is Wide

Jennifer Discussion: The use of electronic health records (EHR) is widely recommended as a means to improve the quality, safety, and efficiency of US health care. (Howard, et al., 2013) Stakeholders can be described as a person or group with a vested interest in a particular clinical decision and the evidence that supports that decision like patients, clinicians, hospital systems/clinics, purchasers/payers, healthcare representatives, policymakers (federal, state, local) and researchers (Cottrell, et al., 2016). Stakeholders can be the leadership/administrative team, board members, or partnerships alongside an organization. When it comes to implementing a CIS, the stakeholders' involvement is critical to the success of these implementation efforts, especially during the decision, selection, pre-implementation, implementation, and post-implementation phases; Involvement of various stakeholder groups throughout the entire process is paramount for implementing any information systems (Hartzler, et al., 2013). The implementation of a CIS should impact staff in several ways, decrease staff burdens like check-in and rooming, staff charting, and communication. When it comes to check-in, rooming, and charting, EHR use allows staff to electronically track when patients arrived, and to quickly find patient demographic information, problem, and medication lists, immunization records, previous visit records, vital signs, as well as lab and other test results, without searching through paper charts (Howard, et al., 2013). Messaging features within the EMR facilitate more effective communication between staff and physicians (Howard, et al., 2013). Implementing a new CIS will improve overall patient care, as EMRs consolidate all patient data in one location. Providers can deliver high-quality care at the point of care, leading to an enhanced patient experience and improved outcomes (Health IT, 2017). Additionally, EMRs offer features for patients such as patient portals, electronic referrals, prescriptions, and notifications (Health IT, 2017).

Paper For Above instruction

Electronic Health Records (EHR) systems have revolutionized the healthcare landscape by enhancing the quality, safety, and efficiency of patient care. Their widespread implementation is rooted in the necessity to address persistent challenges within traditional paper-based systems and meet the evolving demands of modern healthcare delivery. Central to this transformation are the stakeholders involved—from clinicians and hospital administration to policymakers and patients—whose active engagement determines the success of EHR integration.

The importance of stakeholder involvement cannot be overstated. As Howard et al. (2013) emphasize, stakeholders—including healthcare providers, administrative leaders, patients, payers, and policymakers—bring diverse interests and perspectives. Their participation during all phases of EHR implementation—decision-making, selection, pre-implementation, deployment, and post-implementation—ensures that the system aligns with clinical needs, regulatory requirements, and user preferences. For instance, clinicians provide vital insights into workflow integration, while patients emphasize usability and access features such as portals and notifications.

Effective stakeholder engagement facilitates smoother transitions and fosters buy-in, which are critical for overcoming resistance and ensuring long-term sustainability. Hartzler et al. (2013) highlight that involving various groups helps identify potential barriers early, develop tailored training programs, and create a sense of ownership among end-users. For example, when clinicians are involved in customizing input interfaces, they are more likely to adopt and utilize the system effectively. Similarly, patients’ access to portals enhances transparency and shared decision-making, ultimately leading to improved health outcomes.

From an operational standpoint, EHR systems significantly impact staff workflows. They streamline administrative tasks, such as check-in, rooming, charting, and communication, reducing manual effort and minimizing errors. Howard et al. (2013) demonstrated that EHRs allow staff to electronically track patient arrivals, access demographic and medical data rapidly, and retrieve lab and test results effortlessly. Moreover, messaging features within Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) foster better communication among healthcare team members, promoting coordinated and timely care.

Beyond administrative efficiencies, EHR systems contribute to clinical quality improvement. Consolidating patient data into a single digital repository enhances the accuracy of documentation, supports evidence-based decision-making, and reduces medication errors. The availability of comprehensive data at the point of care improves diagnostic accuracy and facilitates personalized treatment plans. Furthermore, the integration of decision support tools within EHRs alerts clinicians to potential adverse drug interactions, allergies, or critical lab values, thereby enhancing patient safety.

Patient-centered features of EHRs also influence stakeholder satisfaction and care quality. Patient portals enable individuals to access their health records, review lab results, request refills, and communicate with providers—fostering transparency and engagement (Health IT, 2017). This access empowers patients to participate actively in their care and promotes adherence to treatment regimens. Additionally, electronic referrals and notifications streamline care coordination across providers, reducing delays and redundant tests.

Despite these advantages, implementing EHR systems entails challenges. One major concern is the potential disruption of workflows and initial productivity decreases as staff adapt to new technology. Resistance often stems from perceived increased workloads, unfamiliarity with systems, or concerns about data privacy. Stakeholders' varying levels of technological literacy can further complicate adoption, especially among older patients or less tech-savvy providers. Training and ongoing support are essential to mitigate these issues and maximize benefits.

Financial considerations also play a crucial role. The upfront costs of purchasing, customizing, and maintaining EHR systems can be substantial. Nonetheless, the long-term cost savings through improved efficiency, reduced errors, and better population health management often justify initial investments (Lübbeke et al., 2019). Stakeholders must carefully evaluate cost-benefit aspects and explore funding opportunities to ensure sustainable implementation.

Moreover, the successful deployment of EHR systems hinges on addressing data security and privacy concerns. Strict adherence to regulations like HIPAA ensures patient information remains confidential and protected from breaches. Stakeholder commitment to security protocols and ethical standards is vital in maintaining trust and compliance.

In conclusion, the integration of EHR systems, guided by comprehensive stakeholder engagement, has the potential to transform healthcare delivery profoundly. By involving clinicians, administrators, patients, and policymakers throughout the process, healthcare organizations can implement systems that enhance clinical outcomes, improve efficiency, and foster a patient-centered approach. Overcoming challenges related to workflow disruptions, costs, and security requires strategic planning, ongoing training, and robust governance. As healthcare continues to evolve, the role of well-implemented EHRs remains pivotal in achieving high-quality, safe, and efficient patient care.

References

• Howard, J., Clark, E. C., Friedman, A., Crosson, J. C., Pellerano, M., Crabtree, B. F., & Cohen, D. J. (2013). Electronic health record impact on work burden in small, unaffiliated, community-based primary care practices. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28(1), 29-35.
• Cottrell, E., Whitlock, E., Kato, E., Uhl, S., Belinson, S., & Chang, C. (2016). Defining the benefits of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US).
• Health IT. (2017). Improved patient care using EHRs. HealthIT.gov.
• Hartzler, A., McCarty, C. A., Rasmussen, L. V., Williams, M. S., Brilliant, M., Bowton, E. A., & Trinidad, S. B. (2013). Stakeholder engagement: A key component of integrating genomic information into electronic health records. Genetics in Medicine, 15(10), 761-770.
• Lübbeke, A., Carr, A. J., & Hoffmeyer, P. (2019). Registry stakeholders. EFORT open reviews, 4(6), 330-336.
• Teixeira, R. A., Lopes, P., & Oliveira, J. (2022). Challenges and strategies in electronic health record implementation. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 129, 104031.
• Menachemi, N., & Collum, T. H. (2011). Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 4, 47-55.
• Adler-Milstein, J., & Jha, A. K. (2017). HITECH act reached a critical milestone in driving EHR adoption. Health Affairs, 36(8), 1416-1422.
• Demiris, G., Oliver, D̄., & Washington, C. (2010). Ethical issues in electronic health record systems. Journal of Healthcare Management, 55(2), 78-87.
• Baxter, S., Johnson, M., Chambers, D., Sutton, S., Goyder, E., & Booth, A. (2018). The effect of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: A systematic review. Meta-analysis.