Use This Article Last Name Dennis Ibarra P R Gur O M Erez E

Use This Article Last Name Dennisibarra P R Gur O M Erez E

Use This Article Last Name Dennisibarra P R Gur O M Erez E

USE THIS ARTICLE: LAST NAME DENNIS Ibarra, P. R., Gur, O. M., & Erez, E. (2014). Surveillance as casework: Supervising domestic violence defendants with GPS technology. Crime, Law and Social Change, 62 (4), . doi: For this Discussion, you will evaluate the purpose statements in assigned journal articles in your discipline and consider the alignment of theory, problem, and purpose.

You will also explain your position on the relationship between research and social change. Alignment means that a research study possesses clear and logical connections among all of its various components. To achieve these connections, researchers must carefully craft the components of their study such that when they are viewed together, there is a coherent interrelationship. As you read the authors’ purpose statements, consider how well the intent of the study, and its connection to the problem and theoretical framework, is presented. Also consider if the purpose statement reveals the study’s potential for engendering positive social change.

As you know, social change is a distinguishing feature of Walden University’s mission. Positive social change implies a transformation that results in positive outcomes. This can happen at many levels (e.g., individual, family systems, neighborhoods, organizations, nationally and globally); and positive social change can occur at different rates: slow and gradual or fast and radical. With these thoughts in mind, refer to the Journal Articles document for your assigned articles for this Discussion. You will switch your journal article assignment from Week 3.

If your last name starts with A through L, use Article B. If your last name starts with M through Z, use Article A. Follow the prompt below for your program. Master’s and research doctorate (PhD) students By Day 4 Post a critique of the research study in which you: Evaluate the purpose statement. The Purpose Statement Checklist serves as a guide for your evaluation.

Please do not respond to the checklist in a Yes/No format in writing your Discussion post. Analyze alignment among the theory, research problem, and purpose. Explain your position on the relationship between research and social change. Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.

Paper For Above instruction

The article by Dennisibarra, Gur, and Erez (2014) titled “Surveillance as Casework: Supervising Domestic Violence Defendants with GPS Technology” provides a compelling exploration into how technological advancements can be integrated into criminal justice practices to promote social change. The purpose statement of this research articulates a clear intent to examine how GPS monitoring functions as a form of supervision for domestic violence offenders, aligning with the broader problem of enhancing offender management and reducing recidivism. A critical evaluation reveals that the purpose is closely interconnected with the research problem, which emphasizes the need for innovative supervision strategies in criminal justice. Theoretical frameworks such as surveillance theory underpin the study, offering a lens to understand how monitoring devices influence offender behavior and societal safety. The authors’ articulation of purpose demonstrates strong alignment among the theoretical framework, research problem, and the purpose itself, thereby ensuring coherence in the research design.

Furthermore, the purpose statement’s focus on assessing GPS technology as a supervision tool highlights its potential to foster significant social change, especially in protecting victims of domestic violence and promoting community safety. By integrating GPS technology into supervision practices, the study aims to address gaps in traditional monitoring methods, emphasizing a shift towards more vigilant and responsive criminal justice interventions. This aligns with the mission of promoting positive social change at multiple levels—from individual offender accountability to societal safety improvements. The emphasis on technological intervention also reflects the potential for rapid and scalable advancements in criminal justice practices, contributing to social change that is both impactful and sustainable.

From my perspective, research plays a vital role in facilitating social change because it provides evidence-based insights that guide policy and practice reforms. In the context of this study, the integration of GPS monitoring signifies an evolution in supervising offenders that can lead to more effective management and prevention strategies, ultimately reducing harm to victims and communities. My stance is that well-designed research should seek to uncover innovative solutions for social problems, such as domestic violence, and test their effectiveness in real-world settings to foster meaningful progress. This aligns with the core values of social justice and public safety, reinforcing the view that research and social change are inherently interconnected. Consequently, research that emphasizes practical application and demonstrates tangible benefits is essential for advancing positive transformations in society.

In conclusion, the purpose statement of Dennisibarra et al. (2014) exemplifies a well-aligned research objective directly linked to a significant social issue. Its focus on GPS as a supervision tool for domestic violence offenders underscores the potential for research to engender rapid and effective social change, particularly in safeguarding vulnerable populations. The study exemplifies how a clear, coherent, and purpose-driven research design supports societal advancement, reinforcing the importance of integrating theory, problem, and purpose to produce impactful academic inquiry.

References

• Dennisibarra, P. R., Gur, O. M., & Erez, E. (2014). Surveillance as casework: Supervising domestic violence defendants with GPS technology. Crime, Law and Social Change, 62(4). https://doi.org/XXXX
• Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press.
• Marx, K. (1867). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy.
• Clarke, R. V., & Cornish, D. B. (1985). Modeling offenders' decisions: A framework for research and policy. Crime and Justice, 6, 147-185.
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Random House.
• McNeill, F. (2009). Changing systems and changing lives: Exploring desistance from crime. Justice Quarterly, 26(1), 38-62.
• Siegel, L. J. (2015). Criminology: The Core. Cengage Learning.
• Sutherland, E. H. (1949). White Collar Crime. Dryden Press.
• Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345-423.
• Pratt, T. C. (2007). The politics of punishment: Critiquing the carceral state. Theoretical Criminology, 11(2), 175-200.