Using Academic Scholarly Research Find An Article That Addre

Using Academic Scholarly Research Find An Article That Addresses An E

Using academic scholarly research, find an article that addresses an ethical dilemma from the past five years and annotate it thoroughly. What are the key points to the article? Summarize the dilemma. What are the key terms of the article? What conflicts or controversies does it raise? Where can you offer analysis or an original point of view? Once you have a handle on the article and your reaction to the issues it raises, use it as a foundation to create your own 2-4 paragraph "dilemma." Apply Kant’s Categorical Imperative to the problem you invent. Apply any other method you have encountered in lecture material and the readings. State which method you prefer and why. Work with a partner collaboratively to share and divide this work for optimal results. Your paper should be 3 pages. You MUST provide the source of the foundation dilemma, and thus this paper will require 1 reference using at least 1 correct in-text citation (indicating quoted or paraphrased material from the article and where to locate it). Use APA format in citing the source.

Paper For Above instruction

In recent years, ethical dilemmas have become increasingly prominent in various fields, particularly with the rapid development of technology. One pertinent article from the past five years is by Johnson (2020), which explores the ethical implications of data privacy in social media platforms. The article’s key points include the erosion of user privacy, the responsibilities of social media companies, and the tension between profit motives and ethical obligations. Johnson (2020) emphasizes that social media companies often prioritize user engagement and advertising revenue at the expense of user privacy, raising significant ethical concerns regarding informed consent and data security.

The central dilemma discussed revolves around how social media firms collect, store, and utilize user data without adequate transparency or user consent. Key terms in the article include “data privacy,” “informed consent,” “algorithmic bias,” and “corporate responsibility.” The controversy stems from the conflict between companies’ commercial interests and users’ rights to privacy. This has resulted in public outcry over data breaches and manipulated information, fueling debates about the ethical limits of data collection practices.

Analyzing this article, one can observe that a critical point of contention is the balance of power between corporations and individuals. An original perspective I offer concerns the potential development of a regulatory framework that enforces stricter transparency measures for data practices. Such measures could include independent audits and mandatory disclosures, which would better protect user rights and promote ethical corporate behavior. This approach could mitigate some of the conflicts arising from profit-driven motives versus ethical responsibilities.

Building upon this foundation, I will craft a hypothetical ethical dilemma involving a biotech company experimenting with human gene editing. Suppose a company considers proceeding with gene-editing procedures to eliminate hereditary diseases, but without fully informing patients of unknown long-term risks. Applying Kant’s Categorical Imperative, one must ask whether it would be morally permissible to act in a way that if universalized, would lead to a world where patients are routinely misinformed about risks. This act could be seen as inherently unethical because it treats patients merely as means to an end rather than as ends in themselves, violating Kantian principles.

Another method I employ is utilitarianism, which would evaluate the greatest good for the greatest number. If gene editing could prevent suffering and extend life, perhaps this act could be justified. However, given the potential long-term risks and the possibility of unintended consequences, the utilitarian approach must carefully weigh these factors. I argue that Kant’s deontological approach aligns better because it emphasizes respecting individuals' autonomy through honesty, which is fundamental in medical ethics. Therefore, I prefer Kant’s method, as it upholds dignity and rights over purely consequentialist considerations.

References

• Johnson, L. (2020). Ethical challenges in social media data privacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(2), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3922-0