Using Evidence-Based Design Principles To Design HCS529 Vers

Using Evidence Based Design Principles To Designhcs529 Version 61univ

Using Evidence-Based Design Principles To Designhcs529 Version University of Phoenix Material Using Evidence-Based Design Principles to Design Imagine you are the health care administrator who has been reviewing the architect’s recommendations for toilet placement within the new wing of the hospital. The architect has provided you with four toilet placement options: outboard, inboard, same-handed, or nested. It is important to understand the advantages and disadvantages of each recommendation prior to providing your opinion of the placement to the architects. Use the following chart to organize your research of evidence-based design principles and the four toilet placements within the new wing of the hospital.

Evidence-Based Design Principle Describe in 45 to 90 words the evidence-based design principle for each layout. Describe in 45 to 90 words the impact on the stakeholder’s experience with each placement (i.e., patients, medical staff, hospital staff, and family/visitors). Cite at least 1 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar references to support each evidence-based design principle. Outboard Layout Inboard Layout Same-handed Layout Nested Layout Organizational Behavior – first Bi term Activity #4 - Article Critique Assignment In this assignment, you are to critically read and evaluate a scholarly article’s strengths, weaknesses, and contributions to the study field. Learning how to critique a journal article has several benefits, including preparing you for publishing in the future and keeping you current on the literature in your field of study.

The practical application is developing the ability to look at research within your organization and industry with a knowledgeable, critical eye. The University of the Cumberlands (UC) Library subscribes to many journals and provides you access to appropriate collections to support this assignment. Using the UC Library, locate and review the following peer-reviewed articles: · Dysvik, A & Kuvaas, B. (2013). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as predictors of work effort: The moderating role of achievement goals. British Journal of Social Psychology , 52 (3), 412–430. · Aydogmus, Metin Camgoz, S., Ergeneli, A., & Tayfur Ekmekci, O. (2018). Perceptions of transformational leadership and job satisfaction: The roles of personality traits and psychological empowerment. Journal of Management & Organization , 24 (1), 81–107. · Fitzsimmons, Callan, V. J., & Paulsen, N. (2014). Gender disparity in the C-suite: Do male and female CEOs differ in how they reached the top? The Leadership Quarterly , 25 (2), 245–266. · Flocco, Canterino, F., & Cagliano, R. (2021). Leading innovation through employees’ participation: Plural leadership in employee-driven innovation practices. Leadership (London, England) , 17 (5), 499–518. · Kuenzi, Mayer, D. M., & Greenbaum, R. L. (2020). Creating an ethical organizational environment: The relationship between ethical leadership, ethical organizational climate, and unethical behavior. Personnel Psychology , 73 (1), 43–71. · de Reuver, Van de Voorde, K., & Kilroy, S. (2021). When do bundles of high performance work systems reduce employee absenteeism? The moderating role of workload. International Journal of Human Resource Management , 32 (13), 2889–2909. Following your review, choose one article from this list; critically evaluate the article’s strengths, weaknesses, and contribution to the study field using the outline below as a guide: Cover page · The cover page will include: · Articles Title and Author (s) · Name of Journal (s) · Date of publication · Your name Executive Summary · Summarize the significant aspects of the entire article, including: · · The overall purpose and general area of study of the article. · The specific problem being addressed in the study. · The main findings of the article. Literature Review · Briefly summarize the overall themes presented in the Literature Review. · · Was the literature review applicable to the study, current and thorough? · Were there gaps in the literature review? Data Analysis · · Identify the methodology used: qualitative, quantitative, mixed? Was the chosen methodology appropriate for the study? Why or why not? · Did the data analysis prove or disprove the research questions? Explain. Results/Conclusion · In this section, you will address the following: · Describe the article’s relevance to the field of knowledge. · Outline the strengths and weaknesses of the article. Be specific. · Based on the article, what future research do you think needs to be accomplished in this area? · What are your key points and takeaways after analyzing the article? Proper APA in-text citation must be used. The review is to be word-processed double spaced, not less than two pages, and no more than five pages in length. Paper length does not include the cover page, abstract, or references page(s).

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment primarily focuses on two interconnected tasks: evaluating evidence-based design (EBD) principles relating to toilet placement within a hospital setting, and critically reviewing scholarly articles relevant to organizational behavior and management. The first task requires an understanding of different toilet layout options—outboard, inboard, same-handed, and nested—and their implications on stakeholder experiences, supported by peer-reviewed literature. The second task involves selecting one peer-reviewed article from a provided list, analyzing its strengths, weaknesses, and contributions to the field, culminating in a comprehensive critique that adheres to APA standards.

Designing hospital facilities necessitates applying evidence-based principles to optimize patient safety, staff efficiency, and overall experience. The four toilet placement options each serve different organizational and ergonomic goals. Outboard toilets, positioned externally to the main pathway, can reduce congestion and improve access, although they may incur increased construction costs and spatial demands. Inboard toilets, located within central zones, facilitate ease of access for staff and visitors, but can increase congestion and noise in busy areas. Same-handed layouts, where fixtures face the same direction, promote uniformity and ease of cleaning, yet may limit flexibility in spatial design. Nested layouts, where toilet stalls are grouped within larger compartments, offer privacy and efficient space use, but can complicate cleaning routines and maintenance. These design choices influence stakeholder experiences differently; for instance, outboard layouts may improve privacy but pose accessibility challenges, while nested layouts enhance privacy but may hinder rapid maintenance. Literature supports these observations, with studies highlighting the importance of spatial configuration in optimizing safety, efficiency, and patient satisfaction (Ulrich, 2009; Hamilton & Smith, 2018).

In evaluating scholarly articles, it is critical to examine research methodology, literature relevance, data analysis, and conclusions. For example, considering the article by Dysvik and Kuvaas (2013), which investigates motivation and work effort, the study employs quantitative methods—specifically, surveys and statistical analyses—that appropriately address the research questions. The literature review provides a thorough background on motivation theories relevant to organizational behavior, although some recent developments in intrinsic motivation could be further incorporated. The results suggest that achievement goals moderate the relationship between motivation types and work effort, contributing valuable insights into motivational strategies in organizations. Strengths include robust statistical analysis and clear implications; weaknesses involve limited diversity in sample populations. Future research could explore longitudinal effects or cross-cultural differences.

Overall, critical appraisal reveals that integrating evidence-based design in hospital planning enhances stakeholder experiences and operational efficiency. Similarly, rigorous evaluation of scholarly articles advances knowledge in organizational behavior and management practices. Consistently applying APA standards and thorough critique processes ensures academic rigor, facilitating meaningful contributions to healthcare facility design and organizational research.

References

• Ulrich, R. S. (2009). Evidence-based healthcare architecture. Medical Clinics of North America, 93(3), 541-555.
• Hamilton, B., & Smith, T. (2018). Spatial configuration and patient outcomes in hospital design. Journal of Healthcare Design, 12(2), 23-35.
• Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2013). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as predictors of work effort: The moderating role of achievement goals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 412–430.
• Aydogmus, M. C., Ergeneli, A., & Ekmekci, O. T. (2018). Perceptions of transformational leadership and job satisfaction: The roles of personality traits and psychological empowerment. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(1), 81–107.
• Fitzsimmons, C. V., & Paulsen, N. (2014). Gender disparity in the C-suite: Do male and female CEOs differ in how they reached the top? The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 245–266.
• Flocco, C., & Cagliano, R. (2021). Leading innovation through employees’ participation: Plural leadership in employee-driven innovation practices. Leadership, 17(5), 499–518.
• Kuenzi, M., Mayer, D. M., & Greenbaum, R. L. (2020). Creating an ethical organizational environment: The relationship between ethical leadership, ethical organizational climate, and unethical behavior. Personnel Psychology, 73(1), 43–71.
• de Reuver, M., Van de Voorde, K., & Kilroy, S. (2021). When do bundles of high performance work systems reduce employee absenteeism? The moderating role of workload. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(13), 2889–2909.