Using Feedback From Your Professor And Classmates To 332524

Using Feedback From Your Professor And Classmates Revise Part 1 And D

Using feedback from your professor and classmates, revise Part 1 and develop the solution and identify the advantages of the solution. Note: The disadvantages or challenges with your answers will be in Part 3. Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you: Provide Part I: Revision of A Problem Exists (3-4 pages) 1. Revise, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part I: A Problem Exists. Develop Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages (3-4 pages for 6-8 pages total) 2. Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph. (The thesis statement may need to be modified to reflect added information and purpose of this part.) 3. Explain a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. 4. State, explain, and support the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. 5. State, explain, and support the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. 6. State, explain, and support the third (and fourth if desired) advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. 7. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences. 8. Provide a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages. 9. Develop a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion. 10. Use one (1) or more rhetorical strategies (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain advantages. 11. Support advantage claims with at least three (3) additional quality relevant references. Use at least six (6) total for Parts 1 and 2. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines: •Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. •Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of revising and developing a persuasive paper is essential for strengthening arguments and presenting effective solutions to identified problems. Building upon initial analyses, such revisions incorporate feedback, refine thesis statements, and elucidate the advantages of proposed solutions. This comprehensive approach ensures that the final paper articulates a compelling, well-supported argument grounded in credible evidence and effective rhetorical strategies.

The initial problem statement, derived from Part I, must be revisited and rewritten in light of feedback from peers and instructors. This revision serves to clarify the scope, importance, and specifics of the problem, setting the stage for developing viable solutions. The clarified problem should be succinct yet comprehensive, emphasizing its relevance to current societal, economic, or environmental contexts. A strong thesis statement must be crafted early in the paper, clearly articulating the main argument and guiding the subsequent discussion regarding solutions and advantages.

The core of the paper involves proposing a detailed, feasible solution that directly addresses the identified problem. This solution should be supported by evidence, illustrate how it effectively mitigates or resolves the issue, and be presented in one or two well-developed paragraphs. Ensuring the solution’s viability involves considering practical implementation steps, potential obstacles, and real-world applicability.

The advantages of the proposed solution are instrumental in persuading stakeholders of its value. These advantages encompass various dimensions—economic, social, political, environmental, and ethical—that underscore why the solution is beneficial and necessary. Each advantage should be clearly articulated, supported with logical reasoning, and reinforced with credible evidence. For example, an economic benefit might include cost savings or job creation, while an environmental advantage could involve sustainability or pollution reduction.

Furthermore, employing rhetorical strategies such as ethos, logos, and pathos enhances the persuasive impact of the argument. Ethos establishes credibility, logos appeals to logic with data and facts, and pathos connects emotionally, motivating support. These strategies should be woven naturally into the discussion of advantages to strengthen the overall argument.

Finally, the paper concludes with a summary that reiterates the problem, restates the proposed solution, and emphasizes its benefits. It should seamlessly transition into the closing remarks, leaving a compelling impression about the importance and feasibility of the proposed approach. Supporting the claims with at least three additional scholarly references strengthens credibility and demonstrates thorough research.

References

• Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Year). Title of the book or article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages.
• Another, C. C. (Year). Title of the publication. Publisher or Journal, Volume(Issue), pages.
• Researcher, D. D. (Year). Title of the study or report. Organization or Journal, Volume, pages.
• Additional, E. E., & Collaborator, F. F. (Year). Title related to solution benefits. Journal or Source.
• Further, G. G. (Year). Evidence supporting advantages. Journal or Website.
• Expert, H. H. (Year). Analysis of solution impact. Journal or Book.