Using Information To Support Sourcing Decisions The Purchase

Using Information to Support Sourcing Decisions The Purchasing Manager

Using Information to Support Sourcing Decisions The purchasing manager has provided the following information for your use: Spend Category Amount Thousands US$ Number of Suppliers Production Machinery Maintenance Hardware Sheet Metal Electronic Components Assuming that the amounts shown represent the total annual spend (Amount/Total Amount) calculate the percent of spend for each category. Classify each spend category as either low or high complexity and summarize your reasoning. Create a 2x2 Risk/Value matrix showing each of the five spend categories placed in either “High” or “Low” Risk group. Explain why you placed each item in the selected category. Submit your assignment as an MS Word document.

Your assignment must be words (excluding title page and references page) in length, double-spaced and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Contextual (Level One) headings must be used to organize your paper and your thoughts. Must include a title page with the following: Title of paper, Student’s name, Course name and number, Instructor’s name, Date submitted. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. Must utilize a minimum of one scholarly and/or peer-reviewed source from the Ashford Library in addition to the textbook. Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Carefully review the Grading Rubric for evaluation criteria.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Analyzing procurement decisions through data-driven insights is essential for effective supply chain management. In this report, I will interpret the provided spend data, classify each category based on complexity, and categorize these spend items within a risk/value matrix to facilitate strategic sourcing decisions.

Analysis of Spend Data and Calculation of Percentages

The provided data comprises five spend categories with their respective annual expenditure in thousands of US dollars:

- Production Machinery

- Maintenance Hardware

- Sheet Metal

- Electronic Components

Assuming the total spend is the sum of these categories, I will first calculate the total expenditure:

Suppose the individual spend data is as follows (values hypothetical, as actual figures are not specified):

- Production Machinery: $X thousands

- Maintenance Hardware: $Y thousands

- Sheet Metal: $Z thousands

- Electronic Components: $W thousands

Total Spend = X + Y + Z + W

For each category, the percentage of total spend is calculated as:

Percent = (Category Spend / Total Spend) * 100

This computation enables procurement professionals to identify which categories dominate spending, enabling targeted management strategies.

Classification of Spend Categories by Complexity

The complexity of procurement categories can be assessed based on factors such as the number of suppliers, the difficulty in specification, and market volatility.

- Production Machinery: Generally high complexity due to specialized specifications, limited supplier options, and significant technical considerations.

- Maintenance Hardware: Typically low to moderate complexity; consumables and replacement parts often have multiple suppliers and standardized specifications.

- Sheet Metal: Moderate complexity; depends on specific grades, dimensions, and fabrication requirements, with a relatively stable supplier base.

- Electronic Components: High complexity due to technological obsolescence, quickly changing specifications, and supplier shortages.

Summarizing, Production Machinery and Electronic Components are high complexity due to specialized technical and market factors, whereas Maintenance Hardware and Sheet Metal are lower complexity, being more commoditized.

Development of a 2x2 Risk/Value Matrix

The risk/value matrix is a strategic tool to identify procurement priorities. Categories are placed based on their assessed risk and value contribution.

| | High Value | Low Value |

|------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|

| High Risk | Electronic Components, Production Machinery | — |

| Low Risk | Maintenance Hardware, Sheet Metal | — |

- Electronic Components: High risk due to supply volatility, technological obsolescence, and potential supply chain disruptions; high value due to strategic importance.

- Production Machinery: High risk because of specialized procurement challenges and potential production downtime; high value owing to capital expenditure importance.

- Maintenance Hardware: Low risk, readily available commodities, and minimal impact on core operations, thus classified as low risk and low value.

- Sheet Metal: Moderate to low risk, due to standardized aspects and stable supplier market; low to moderate value.

This categorization helps focusing sourcing efforts on high-risk, high-value items, where strategic supplier management and risk mitigation are critical.

Conclusion

Effective sourcing decisions rely on accurate data analysis, understanding of procurement complexity, and strategic risk assessment. Classifying spend categories by complexity and positioning them within a risk/value matrix allows procurement managers to prioritize supplier relationships and mitigate supply chain disruptions. Moving forward, integrating such analytical tools with supplier performance metrics and market intelligence will enhance procurement resilience in a volatile global economy.

References

  1. Baily, P., Farmer, D., Crocker, B., Jessop, D., & Jones, D. (2015). Procurement and Supply Chain Management (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
  2. Carter, C. R., & Roger, M. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.
  3. Choy, K. L., & Lai, K. H. (2008). Risk management of strategic suppliers in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 545–557.
  4. Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review, 61(5), 109–117.
  5. Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2020). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  6. Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2007). Designing and Managing the Supply Chain. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  7. Vaaland, T., & Håkansson, H. (2007). The impact of global sourcing on procurement management. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13(3), 125–136.
  8. Walker, H., & Brammer, S. (2009). Sustainable procurement in the European public sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 166–172.
  9. Zsidisin, G. A., & Ritchie, B. (2009). Supply Risk Management. Springer.
  10. Stevenson, M., & Spring, M. (2009). The purchasing function in the supply chain. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(4), 435–455.

Related Assignments