Using Research Methodologies For Research Questions

Using Research Methodologiesresearch Questions Drive The Methodology

Using Research Methodologies Research questions drive the methodology. Thinking about a community-based organization in your area, consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies. Create an appropriate research question for each methodology that would be of interest for your chosen organization. Explain why the methodology is appropriate for each question and identify the methodology's strengths and weaknesses. Which of the three questions and methods would be most interesting to you, and why? Your response should be an APA-formatted response of no less than 300 words.

Paper For Above instruction

Community-based organizations (CBOs) play a vital role in addressing local social, economic, and health issues. To better understand and improve their services, it is crucial to develop research questions that align with appropriate methodologies—quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Each approach offers unique insights and has specific strengths and weaknesses, making them suitable for different types of questions. This paper proposes one research question for each methodology relevant to a hypothetical community organization and discusses their appropriateness, advantages, and limitations. Finally, it reflects on which methodology and question is most compelling.

Quantitative Research Question

For a CBO focused on reducing homelessness, a suitable quantitative research question might be: "What is the impact of emergency shelter programs on the rate of homelessness recurrence over a 12-month period?" This question seeks measurable data—recurrence rates—and aims to establish statistical relationships. Quantitative methods are appropriate here because they allow for the collection of numerical data, enabling the organization to evaluate the effectiveness of its programs through objective analysis. The strength of this approach is its ability to analyze large datasets, providing generalizable results with high reliability. However, a significant weakness is that it may overlook contextual factors and individual experiences that contribute to homelessness recurrence, which are critical for comprehensive understanding.

Qualitative Research Question

A qualitative question suited for a community organization serving youth might be: "How do young people experiencing homelessness perceive and navigate the support services available to them?" This question aims to explore personal experiences, perceptions, and meanings, which are best captured through interviews, focus groups, or ethnographic studies. The qualitative methodology is appropriate because it allows for rich, in-depth insights into individual stories and social contexts. Its strengths include providing detailed understanding and uncovering nuanced perspectives that quantitative data might miss. Conversely, its weaknesses include limitations in generalizability and potential researcher bias, as findings may be specific to particular individuals or settings.

Mixed Methods Research Question

An integrated question for a health-focused community organization could be: "How do health outcomes among residents accessing preventive care correlate with their engagement levels and personal health beliefs?" This question combines quantitative data on health outcomes with qualitative insights into personal beliefs and engagement. Mixed methods are suitable here because they allow for a comprehensive analysis, combining statistical trends with contextual understanding. The main advantage is the depth and robustness of findings; however, mixed methods can be resource-intensive, requiring more time, expertise, and coordination.

Most Interesting Methodology

Personally, the mixed methods approach is most intriguing because it offers a holistic view of complex social issues, combining numerical data with personal narratives. This approach can generate more actionable insights, bridging the gap between statistical analysis and human experience. Understanding the interplay between measurable outcomes and personal perceptions provides a nuanced perspective that can inform more effective, empathetic interventions.

References

• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage Publications.
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Fetters, M. D., & Savoie-Roque, K. H. (2017). Mixed methods research: An overview and relevance to public health practice. Public Health Reports, 132(4), 432–442.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
• Plano Clark, V. L., & Creswell, J.. W. (2015). Understanding research: A pathway to better health and social sciences. Jossey-Bass.
• Silverman, D. (2013). Qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). A call for greater use of mixed methods research in educational research. Research in the Schools, 14(1), 1–8.