Using The Business Combination Microsoft Stock Acquisition
Using The Business Combination Microsoft Stock Acquisition With Skype
Using the business combination Microsoft Stock acquisition with Skype technology, identify each business combination as one of the following: vertical integration (value chain enhancement), horizontal integration (acquiring a competitor or market share expansion), or investment (simply diversification acquiring an undervalued company). Prepare a report that analyzes why you think the parent chose to complete the business combination. Support your conclusion with scholarly research.
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
The acquisition of Skype by Microsoft in 2011 represents a strategic move within the framework of corporate expansion and technology integration. This paper aims to analyze the nature of this business combination by classifying it as vertical integration, horizontal integration, or investment, and to elucidate the strategic rationale behind Microsoft's decision to acquire Skype. The analysis will be supported by scholarly research to provide a comprehensive understanding of the motivations and implications of this acquisition.
Classification of the Microsoft-Skype Business Combination
The acquisition of Skype by Microsoft is best classified as a form of vertical integration, specifically a value chain enhancement, rather than horizontal integration or simple investment. Vertical integration involves a company expanding its operations into different stages of production or distribution within its industry supply chain (Grewal & Levy, 2018). Microsoft, primarily a software and platforms company, recognized the strategic importance of real-time communication and video conferencing technology, which are integral to its broader ecosystem of enterprise and consumer solutions.
By acquiring Skype, Microsoft sought to embed voice and video communication capabilities directly into its products and services, including its operating systems, enterprise software, and devices such as Xbox. This integration aligns with the concept of vertical expansion because it enhances Microsoft's offerings along the value chain—adding communication functionality that complements its existing applications such as Office, Windows, and Azure cloud services (Chesbrough, 2019). Furthermore, it allows Microsoft to control and develop the communication infrastructure, thereby improving its competitive positioning.
In contrast, if Microsoft had acquired a competitor in the same market segment to increase market share, such a move would constitute horizontal integration. Since Skype was a technology platform that complemented Microsoft's product portfolio rather than directly competing only within the same product category, the classification of this acquisition as vertical integration is more appropriate.
Strategic Rationale Behind the Acquisition
Microsoft’s decision to acquire Skype was driven by several strategic considerations aligned with the company's long-term objectives. The primary motive was to strengthen its position in the communication and collaboration space—an increasingly critical market segment driven by digital transformation trends across industries.
Firstly, integration of Skype's communication technology into Microsoft’s ecosystem enabled the company to offer seamless, integrated communication solutions. For example, Skype's capabilities were incorporated into Microsoft Office, Outlook, and later Teams, expanding user engagement and creating a competitive edge against rivals like Google and Cisco (Kumar et al., 2020). This move was consistent with the concept of value chain enhancement, as it improved the operational efficiency and added value to existing Microsoft services.
Secondly, acquiring Skype allowed Microsoft to gain a significant user base. With over 600 million users at the time of acquisition, Skype provided instant access to a broad customer network, facilitating cross-selling and upselling of Microsoft's other products and services (Schmidt & Schöntag, 2019). This could be seen as a strategic investment, but primarily it was leveraged to reinforce Microsoft's integrated service offerings.
Thirdly, the acquisition facilitated Microsoft’s entry into the consumer communications market, traditionally dominated by standalone messaging apps and competitors like Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp. By integrating Skype into its ecosystem, Microsoft aimed to leverage its enterprise strength to penetrate this market segment more effectively (Chesbrough, 2019).
Furthermore, Skype’s technology enabled Microsoft to accelerate its push into cloud-based communication solutions, aligning with the company's broader cloud and enterprise strategy via Microsoft Azure. This integration is a textbook example of vertical synergy, where the company adds purpose-built functionalities to its existing offerings, thus improving the overall value proposition (Grewal & Levy, 2018).
Implications and Conclusions
The Microsoft-Skype acquisition exemplifies strategic vertical integration focused on value chain enhancement. It allowed Microsoft to embed communication technology into its core ecosystem and to create a comprehensive platform capable of competing with other tech giants in the digital communication sphere. This move was aimed at increasing customer engagement, expanding market reach, and accelerating innovation within Microsoft’s product suite.
Scholarly research supports the conclusion that such acquisitions are often motivated by the desire to control critical components of the service delivery process and to capitalize on emerging technology trends (Chesbrough, 2019). In this context, the acquisition was less about simply diversifying investments or acquiring a competitor in the traditional sense and more about strengthening the company’s vertical integration to achieve strategic objectives.
Overall, Microsoft’s strategic rationale for acquiring Skype was to enhance its technological capabilities and to integrate communication functionalities deeply into its ecosystem, thereby fostering innovation, increasing competitive advantage, and supporting long-term growth.
References
- Chesbrough, H. (2019). Open Innovation Results: Going Beyond the Promise and Principles. Oxford University Press.
- Grewal, D., & Levy, M. (2018). Marketing. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Kumar, V., Ramachandran, D., & Raghavan, P. (2020). Digital Transformation and Business Model Innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, 41(4), 62-70.
- Schmidt, S., & Schöntag, M. (2019). The Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. Routledge.
- Ghezzi, A., et al. (2019). Digital Transformation in Business and Society: Theory and Cases. Springer.
- Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.
- Irwin, J. (2018). Business Model Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 96(6), 70-77.
- Peppard, J., & Ward, J. (2016). The Strategic Management of Information Systems. John Wiley & Sons.
- Anderson, C., & Adcock, R. (2017). Strategic Innovation Management. Routledge.
- Yoo, Y., & Boland Jr, R. J. (2018). The Digital Transformation of Business and Society. Journal of Business Research, 97, 85-94.