Using The Following Case From Information Technology ✓ Solved

Using the following case from Information Technology for

Using the case from Information Technology for Managers (2nd ed.), research and summarize other hacks that have impacted private companies or government agencies. Identify both the victim's response to the cyberattack and any government response. Compare and contrast other hacks to Sony's experience in 2014.

Answer the following questions:

  • Compare and contrast the hack experienced by Sony Pictures Entertainment in 2014 with other known hacks.
  • How did the U.S. government respond to the attack? Was the response appropriate?
  • How did Sony respond to the attack? Will Sony's response encourage or discourage future attacks?
  • In what ways does the Sony hack reflect emerging cyberthreats that could be made on critical infrastructure?
  • What steps should be taken so that all businesses and the U.S. government can work together to prevent both real-world terrorist violence and cyberattacks?

Draft a 3-5 page position paper analysis for Sony's Leadership leveraging what you have learned through collaboration, your own independent research, and the application of this week's topics to analyze the above-mentioned case. Start your analysis with the points of this assignment in your final position paper (introduction, summary of the central issue, analysis, recommendations, and conclusion). Be sure to cite your work appropriately using APA formatted citations and include a references page.

Paper For Above Instructions

The landscape of cybersecurity has profoundly changed in the last decade, and incidents of cyberattacks have become alarmingly common, impacting private corporations and government institutions alike. This paper examines the notorious hack of Sony Pictures Entertainment in 2014, comparing and contrasting this event with other significant cyberattacks. Understanding Sony's response, the government's reaction, and the broader implications of these incidents on critical infrastructure will provide valuable insights into how companies and governments might better collaborate to mitigate future risks.

Comparative Analysis of Cyberattacks

In December 2014, Sony Pictures was the target of a significant cyberattack that resulted in the theft of unreleased films, employee data, and private emails. The hackers, attributed to a group called "Guardians of Peace," left threats and demands regarding the release of the film "The Interview," which parodied North Korea's leader Kim Jong-un. Similar incidents have occurred over the years, such as the Equifax data breach in 2017, where sensitive financial information of over 147 million individuals was compromised (Smith, 2018). While the Sony hack was politically motivated, Equifax's breach stemmed from lax security measures, emphasizing different motives behind cyberattacks.

Another notorious incident was the 2015 hack of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which exposed the personal information of approximately 22 million government employees, including fingerprints (Office of Inspector General, 2016). This attack showcased vulnerabilities not just in private corporations but in critical government infrastructure. When contrasting these events, it is essential to note that the response mechanisms and fallout were different due to the nature of the data compromised and the sectors involved.

Government and Corporate Responses

The U.S. government response to the Sony hack included attributing the attack to North Korea, leading to sanctions against the nation. U.S. officials stated that the government viewed the attack as a violation of international norms and emphasized the need for increased cybersecurity measures across all sectors (Patterson, 2015). In evaluating whether this response was appropriate, it mirrors past government reactions to cyber threats. However, critics argue that focusing solely on retaliatory measures does not adequately address the underlying vulnerabilities within the industries affected.

In response to the cyberattack, Sony Pictures engaged in an extensive review of its cybersecurity protocols. The company implemented new security measures and protocols to prevent similar attacks in the future. While these actions were commendable, questions remain on whether they would adequately deter future cyber threats. Experts argue that Sony's comprehensive response may encourage hackers who see the company as having high-value data, thus making them a continuing target (Johnson, 2016).

Emerging Cyberthreats and Critical Infrastructure

The Sony hack serves as a representation of emerging cyberthreats impacting critical infrastructure. The attackers aimed to situate their goals within the political landscape, and companies that store sensitive data must remain vigilant against such targeted assaults. Attacks like Sony's or those on OPM demonstrate that adverse consequences can ripple beyond the immediate company to affect national security and public trust.

To combat these threats, the government and businesses must collaborate effectively. Steps include sharing intelligence about impending threats, conducting frequent training exercises focused on cybersecurity, and creating comprehensive incident response plans. Additionally, establishing public-private partnerships can facilitate information sharing about vulnerabilities and effective countermeasures (Heiser, 2017). This collaboration can also focus on developing standardized cybersecurity frameworks across various industries.

Recommendations for Future Action

As companies like Sony navigate an evolving threat landscape, it is vital to adopt a proactive approach to cybersecurity. Recommendations include:

  • Enhancing employee training programs to recognize phishing and other types of attacks.
  • Conducting regular security audits to assess and strengthen defenses.
  • Investing in advanced cybersecurity technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, to detect anomalies in real-time.
  • Engaging with government entities to stay updated on emerging threats and participate in collaborative defense strategies.
  • Encouraging a culture of cybersecurity awareness throughout the organization.

Conclusion

The Sony hack of 2014 highlights the multifaceted challenges posed by cyberattacks in both the private sector and governmental infrastructure. By comparing Sony's experience with other significant hacks, it becomes clear that responses must adapt to the specific nature of threats and vulnerabilities. The collaboration between the private sector and government agencies is essential to foster a united front against cyber threats that could jeopardize critical infrastructure. Proactive adoption of enhanced cybersecurity measures and frameworks offers the best approach toward creating a secure digital environment for all organizations.

References

  • Heiser, J. (2017). The Cybersecurity Imperative: Why Businesses Must Collaborate with Government to Secure the Digital Economy. Cybersecurity Journal.
  • Johnson, S. (2016). After Sony, What Next? The Impact of Cyberattacks on Businesses. Security Today.
  • Office of Inspector General. (2016). Review of the Year 2015 OPM Data Breach. Washington, D.C.: OPM.
  • Patterson, T. (2015). U.S. Sanctions North Korea After Sony Pictures Hack. The New York Times.
  • Smith, J. (2018). The Equifax Breach and Its Aftermath: Lessons for Cybersecurity. Journal of Business Security.
  • Anderson, R., & Moore, T. (2018). The Economics of Cybercrime. Science.
  • Geer, D., et al. (2020). Cybersecurity and the Future of the Internet Economy. Internet Policy Review.
  • Knapp, K. J., & Langill, J. (2020). Understanding Cybersecurity Threats: A Strategic Approach. Security Management Journal.
  • Li, Y., & Vance, A. (2020). The Role of Leadership in Cybersecurity: Insights from Recent Data Breaches. Journal of Cybersecurity Research.
  • Wong, E. (2019). Cybersecurity Threats: Lessons from the Sony Hack. Harvard Business Review.