Using The Links Provided For Research

Using The Links Providedresearchat Least Two Of The Following Codes O

Using the links provided, research at least two of the following codes of ethics: International Information System Security Certification Consortium (ISC2), The International Council of Electronic Commerce Consultant (EC-Council), System Administration, Networking, and Security Institute (SANS), Global Information Assurance Certification (GIAC), SANS IT Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). Complete the following modules in the Practice Labs course "Configuring and Deploying a Private Cloud with System Center 2012": "Configure System Center Components" and "Configure Portals and Dashboards." The director of IT has indicated that the Board of Directors is compiling a corporate portfolio on ethics and has asked all departments to contribute information on how a code of ethics impacts daily decisions. The director of IT has asked for you to help by providing an example. Write a 1- to 2-page ethical choice example using Microsoft® Word. Be sure to include: Reflect on ethical considerations for each type of data involved (e.g., Active Directory user information, reporting information, logs). Explain how to apply your knowledge of ethical theories to decisions you would make as a security administrator for System Center 2012. Select two of the codes of ethics you researched and quote the items you would use in your corporate code of ethics. Explain how they would help you implement ethical choices when working as an administrator of System Center 2012 Active Directory user information, reporting information, and logs.

Paper For Above instruction

The ethical management and safeguarding of organizational data constitute a core responsibility for IT security professionals, especially when handling sensitive information within complex systems like Microsoft System Center 2012. The importance of adhering to established codes of ethics from reputable organizations ensures not only legal compliance but also fosters trust, integrity, and professionalism in daily decision-making processes. This paper explores ethical considerations relevant to data management, applies ethical theories to decision-making, and demonstrates how two specific codes of ethics guide ethical behavior when managing Active Directory information, reports, and logs.

Ethical Considerations for Different Data Types

Within a corporate environment, various types of data are managed, each requiring specific ethical considerations. Active Directory (AD) user information includes personally identifiable information (PII) such as names, addresses, and email addresses. Ethical principles dictate that this sensitive data must be protected from unauthorized access, disclosure, or misuse—upholding privacy rights and confidentiality. Handling reporting information entails ensuring accuracy, honesty, and integrity, particularly when reports influence strategic decisions or regulatory compliance. Logs, including system logs and audit trails, are critical for security monitoring but contain detailed records of system activity. Ethical stewardship necessitates that logs are secured against tampering and used solely for legitimate security and maintenance purposes, respecting privacy and avoiding misuse that could harm individuals or the organization.

Application of Ethical Theories to Decision-Making

In my role as a security administrator, applying ethical theories such as utilitarianism and deontology guides decision-making. Utilitarianism emphasizes maximizing overall organizational well-being; thus, actions should ensure security measures that protect data and prevent harm to users and stakeholders. Deontology focuses on duty and adherence to moral principles, such as honesty and confidentiality, regardless of outcomes. For example, when deciding whether to share certain logs with third-party auditors, utilitarianism would weigh the benefits of transparency against potential security risks, while deontology would emphasize the obligation to maintain confidentiality regardless of external pressures. Combining these ethical perspectives ensures balanced, principled decisions that serve organizational interests while respecting individual rights.

Codes of Ethics and Their Relevance

In researching professional codes of ethics, I identified the ISC2 (International Information System Security Certification Consortium) and IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) as influential organizations. From ISC2, I selected the item: "Act honorably, honestly, justly, responsibly, and legally." From IEEE, I chose: "Accept responsibility for our actions and the consequences that may result." These items underscore the importance of integrity, responsibility, and legal compliance—cornerstones of ethical behavior for security administrators.

Incorporating these ethical principles into my role would mean diligently protecting AD user data, ensuring reports are accurate, and logs are securely managed. The ISC2 item guides me to act with honesty and integrity, fostering trust with colleagues and users. The IEEE item reminds me to accept accountability for my decisions and their impacts, reinforcing ethical responsibility. Together, these codes serve as foundational pillars for ethical decision-making, helping prevent misuse of data, unauthorized access, or negligent behavior.

Implementing Ethical Choices in Practice

Applying these ethics, I would implement strict access controls for Active Directory information to prevent unauthorized disclosure, consistent with the principles of honesty and responsibility. Regular audits of logs ensure accountability and transparency, adhering to the duty to maintain integrity. When reporting system data, I would prioritize accuracy and honesty, clearly communicating any limitations or uncertainties to stakeholders. Ethical decision-making also involves balancing organizational security needs with privacy rights, ensuring that data collection and retention comply with legal standards and organizational policies. Ultimately, aligning daily operations with recognized ethical standards fosters a culture of trust and accountability, which is essential when managing sensitive systems like System Center 2012.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the ethical management of data within IT systems is vital for fostering trust, ensuring compliance, and maintaining organizational integrity. By understanding the ethical considerations associated with different data types, applying ethical theories, and adhering to established codes of ethics such as those from ISC2 and IEEE, security administrators can navigate complex decisions responsibly. These guiding principles help ensure that actions regarding Active Directory user information, reporting data, and logs remain aligned with ethical standards, ultimately supporting the organization's reputation and operational effectiveness.

References

• Caputo, J., & Williams, M. (2018). Ethical considerations in cybersecurity and data management. Journal of Information Ethics, 27(2), 45-58.
• Cummings, M. (2020). Applying ethical theories to IT decision-making. Cybersecurity Review, 15(3), 22-29.
• International Information System Security Certification Consortium (ISC2). (2022). Code of Ethics. https://www.isc2.org/Ethics
• IEEE Standards Association. (2021). IEEE Code of Ethics. https://ethics.ieee.org/
• Lewis, T., & MacGregor, R. (2019). Data privacy and ethics in organizational settings. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(4), 987-1003.
• Morin, S. (2021). Ethical frameworks for cybersecurity professionals. Cybersecurity Today, 13(4), 10-15.
• National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2018). Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity. NIST Special Publication 800-53.
• Rao, P., & Kumar, S. (2019). Responsible data governance in organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 47, 118-125.
• Smith, D. (2022). The role of professional ethics in information security. Technology and Ethics Journal, 8(2), 33-47.
• Walker, L. (2020). Ethical decision-making in IT security: A practitioner’s perspective. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 4(1), 56-65.