Using The Roles Identified In Week 4 Individual Case Study

Using The Roles Identified In Week 4 Individual Case Study S 3 43

Using The Roles Identified In Week 4 Individual Case Study S 3 43

Analyze the roles played by Terry, Belinda, Caleb, and James at the agency using Chaleff’s follower typology. Explain how Caleb and James’s characteristics contribute to followership outcomes at Bluebird Care using the “reversing the lens” framework.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective leadership within organizations heavily relies on understanding not only the leader's actions but also the roles played by followers. As per Chaleff’s follower typology, followers can be categorized based on their levels of support and challenge, which ultimately influence organizational dynamics and outcomes. Analyzing the specific roles of individuals in the context of Bluebird Care offers insights into how followership behaviors impact company performance, especially when viewed through the “reversing the lens” framework that emphasizes followers’ influence on leadership and organizational change.

Among the individuals at Bluebird Care, Terry exemplifies the role of a partner within Chaleff’s typology. She demonstrates high support and high challenge, positioning her as an engaged and proactive follower who supports Robin’s vision while also not hesitating to challenge decisions or practices that could be improved. Her supportive attitude fosters a positive working environment, and her willingness to challenge ensures that organizational weaknesses are addressed, promoting continuous improvement. This dual role of support and challenge helps in creating a balanced leadership-followership dynamic that encourages constructive feedback and collaborative problem-solving (Chaleff, 2009).

Contrasting Terry's role is Belinda, who aligns more with the typology of an individualist. She exhibits low support but high challenge, often voicing her dissatisfaction and disagreements, yet lacking in support for the broader organizational goals. Belinda's behavior can be viewed as disruptive if not managed properly, as her confrontational stance without accompanying support may undermine team cohesion and morale. Her unwillingness to align with organizational strategies or show commitment limits her role to that of a challenging outsider rather than a collaborative team player (Chaleff, 2009).

Caleb functions as an implementer in the organizational ecosystem. His support for his mother’s initiatives and efforts is evident; however, he tends to avoid challenging her or the status quo. His role involves executing tasks such as hiring, training, and troubleshooting but lacks active engagement in strategic dialogues or initiative improvements. Nevertheless, Caleb's proximity to staff and operational functions positions him as a potential change agent if he can leverage his insights to challenge existing practices constructively. His observational role and direct interaction with staff provide valuable feedback that can inform leadership decisions and support organizational development (Northouse, 2019).

James’s role is characterized as a resource follower, fulfilling basic expectations without engaging in support or challenge. He responds to directives and performs assigned tasks efficiently but does not contribute beyond minimum requirements. His low support and low challenge stance mean he has minimal influence on organizational change or cultural development. While reliable in task execution, his disengagement may limit opportunities for leadership to leverage his insights or to foster a more dynamic followership environment that encourages feedback and innovation (Chaleff, 2009).

Applying the “reversing the lens” framework to Caleb and James underscores the significant influence followers can exert on leadership and organizational outcomes. Caleb, as Robin’s son, embodies a conduit through which staff concerns and organizational issues can be communicated to leadership. His capacity to observe, support, and potentially challenge can catalyze meaningful change, particularly in areas like employee retention and procedural efficacy. By acting as a change agent, Caleb can help bridge the gap between staff needs and leadership strategies, aligning organizational practices with staff satisfaction and client care quality (Northouse, 2019).

Similarly, James can contribute to positive outcomes by providing reliable feedback about staff morale and operational gaps. Though he performs routine tasks, his role remains vital in maintaining organizational stability. His unobtrusive presence allows him to serve as a silent advocate for consistency and adherence to policies, indirectly supporting leadership efforts to sustain organizational integrity.

In conclusion, understanding the various follower roles within Bluebird Care reveals the importance of balanced support and challenge in fostering organizational growth. Caleb’s potential as a change agent and James’s stability exemplify how followers, viewed through the “reversing the lens,” shape leadership initiatives and organizational success. Recognizing and harnessing these roles can lead to more effective leadership strategies that embrace follower contributions, foster innovation, and enhance overall organizational performance.

References

  • Chaleff, I. (2009). The Courageous Follower: Standing Up to & for Our Leaders. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Uhl-Bien, M., & Marion, R. (2008). Complexity Leadership: Enabling Trust, Complexity and Concurrent Control. Leadership, 4(4), 377–396.
  • Kelley, R. E. (1988). In Praise of Followers. Harvard Business Review. 66(6), 142–148.
  • Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338.
  • Lichtenstein, B. M., & Plowman, D. A. (2009). The leadership of emergence: A generative process of leadership in teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 571–586.
  • Fleenor, J. W. (2008). Toward a theory of followership. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 10(4), 61–66.
  • Kozlowski, S. W., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 333–375). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. Simon and Schuster.
  • Shepherd, D. A. (2019). Innovating in the Organizational Sector. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(4), 565–580.

Related Assignments