Using Value Chain Analysis To Demonstrate Your Understanding
Using Value Chain Analysis Demonstrate Your Understanding Of How R
A) Using value chain analysis, demonstrate your understanding of how Ryan Air achieves cost leadership in different parts of the value chain. Identify the risks Ryan Air faces due to its pure cost leadership strategy, using the types of risks given in the chapter and specific examples from the video. B) Using the case Logging Dilemma and specific 9 M functions, explain the functional strategies that are most consistent with either the current technology or the alternative technology for Yakima-Olympia, along with justification. What would you say is the business strategy of Yakima-Olympia (cost leadership or differentiation)? Which technology (current or alternative) is more appropriate given this business strategy? Suggest three alternative ways in which Yakima-Olympia may ensure the use of this appropriate technology. Answer them in 200 words each Videos:
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
Understanding competitive strategies such as cost leadership requires a detailed analysis of how companies structure their operations within the value chain. Ryan Air exemplifies a business that has effectively leveraged cost leadership to dominate the budget airline sector. Meanwhile, Yakima-Olympia's strategic choices, as exemplified in the Logging Dilemma, hinge on selecting appropriate technological strategies aligned with their broader business objectives. This analysis explores these cases through value chain analysis and the nine M functions to elucidate strategic decision-making processes.
Ryan Air's Cost Leadership via Value Chain Analysis
Ryan Air's success in achieving cost leadership is rooted in a strategic configuration of its primary and support activities within the value chain. In inbound logistics, Ryan Air minimizes costs by leasing aircraft rather than owning them, which reduces capital expenditure. Its tight control over operations, including quick turnaround times and simplified procedures at airports, ensures operational efficiency. In outbound logistics, the airline utilizes secondary airports farther from city centers, reducing landing fees and congestion charges, thus lowering costs. During marketing and sales, Ryan Air invests minimally in advertising, relying instead on aggressive online sales platforms and word-of-mouth, which cut costs significantly. Service activities are streamlined by minimal customer service offerings, focusing on essential needs to reduce overheads.
Support activities such as firm infrastructure leverage strict financial controls, centralized management, and efficient HR policies to maintain low costs. Procurement strategies emphasize standardizing aircraft and parts, negotiating volume discounts, and avoiding customization costs. Logistics, from maintenance to fuel management, emphasizes efficiency to avoid unnecessary expenditures.
However, Ryan Air’s cost leadership strategy exposes it to certain risks. The emphasis on cost-cutting can diminish customer service quality, leading to passenger dissatisfaction, which may damage its market reputation. Additionally, the reliance on secondary airports limits market reach and frequency, risking reduced flexibility in response to market changes. External risks include rising fuel prices, regulatory changes, and economic downturns that can threaten margins. The airline's aggressive cost-cutting may also strain supplier and employee relationships, leading to labor disputes or supply chain disruptions. For example, cost reductions in staffing and outsourcing maintenance can compromise safety or operational reliability, which could have significant long-term repercussions.
Strategic Analysis of Yakima-Olympia Using the Logging Dilemma and 9 M Functions
Yakima-Olympia's strategic decision-making in technology adoption must align with its overall business strategy—either cost leadership or differentiation. The Logging Dilemma emphasizes choosing technology that maximizes efficiency versus innovation. Employing the nine M functions—Market, Mission, Management, Media, Money, Major technology, Methods, Materials, and Measurement—provides a comprehensive framework for this evaluation.
Given the current technological landscape, Yakima-Olympia appears to adopt a strategy leaning towards cost leadership by using existing, proven logging equipment that maximizes productivity and minimizes costs. This aligns with a focus on operational efficiency, driving down expenses while maintaining acceptable quality. The alternative technology, which could involve advanced automation or sustainable methods, may offer long-term benefits but requires significant capital investment and may pose risks if not aligned with current market demands or operational capabilities.
The business strategy of Yakima-Olympia is primarily cost leadership, emphasizing efficiency and cost minimization over differentiation. The more appropriate technology, considering this strategy, is the current established system, which ensures predictable output, lower risk, and immediate cost-saving benefits.
To ensure the effective use of this technology, Yakima-Olympia could pursue three alternative strategies:
1. Invest in ongoing staff training to maximize the productivity benefits of current equipment, ensuring operations remain efficient and safe.
2. Develop strategic partnerships with suppliers to secure discounts on materials and maintenance services, reducing procurement costs.
3. Implement continuous process improvement initiatives such as Kaizen to refine operational procedures, further reducing waste and costs associated with current technology.
These approaches reinforce operational efficiency, sustain competitive advantage, and mitigate risks related to transitioning to untested or more expensive technological alternatives.
Conclusion
Both Ryan Air and Yakima-Olympia exemplify how strategic choices in technology and operational management influence competitive positioning. Ryan Air’s aggressive cost leadership through value chain optimization underscores the importance of maintaining cost controls while managing associated risks. Conversely, Yakima-Olympia's strategic focus on utilizing established technology aligns with its objective of operational efficiency within a cost leadership framework, with various strategies available to sustain this choice effectively. Recognizing the alignment between strategy and technology is critical in maintaining competitive advantage and minimizing operational risks.
References
- Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
- Grant, R. M. (2016). Contemporary strategy analysis: Text and cases. Wiley.
- Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2019). Strategic management and competitive advantage: Concepts and cases. Pearson.
- Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. Cengage Learning.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard Business Review, 82(7/8), 52-63.
- Chaffey, D., & Smith, P. R. (2017). Digital marketing excellence: Planning, optimizing and integrating online marketing. Routledge.
- Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, J. D. (2018). Strategic management and business policy: Globalization, innovation, and sustainability. Pearson.
- Saloner, G., Shepard, A., & Podolny, J. (2001). Strategic management. Wiley.
- Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2015). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Harvard Business Review Press.
- Secchi, P. (2009). Sustainable competitive advantage through knowledge and innovation alliances. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(7), 422-436.