Verification Of The Torsion Equation

Verification of the torsion equation

In the field of mechanical engineering, understanding the torsion of circular shafts is essential for designing components that can withstand rotational forces without failure. Torsion involves the application of torque to an object, causing it to twist about its longitudinal axis. Accurate analysis and verification of torsional behavior are vital in ensuring structural integrity and safety, especially in shafts, axles, and drive systems. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the theory behind torsion in circular shafts, an experimental setup for testing shear torsion, and an analysis verifying the torsion equation through experimental data, including error discussions.

Introduction

Torque is a measure of rotational force, and it plays a fundamental role in the mechanical design of numerous engineering systems. When a torque is applied to a circular shaft, shear stresses develop within the material, resulting in an angular displacement or twist. The relationship between torque, shear stress, and angle of twist is governed by classical torsion theory, which provides formulas to predict the behavior of shafts subjected to torsional loads (Shigley & Mischke, 2004). Accurate verification of these formulas helps engineers ensure safety margins and optimize material selection for specific applications.

Theoretical Background on Torsion of Circular Shafts

The standard torsion equation relates the applied torque (T), the shear modulus of the material (G), the polar moment of inertia (J), and the angle of twist (θ) over the length (L) of the shaft as follows:

    T = (G  J  θ) / L

For a solid circular shaft, the polar moment of inertia (J) is given by:

    J = (π * d4) / 32

where d is the diameter of the shaft. This equation assumes linear elastic behavior, uniform material properties, and a homogeneous shaft. The importance of torsional analysis lies in its ability to predict the maximum shear stress, the angular displacement, and the torsional stiffness, which is a measure of the shaft's resistance to twisting.

Experimental Setup and Methods

The experiment involves fixing one end of a rigid circular shaft specimen and applying a known torque at the free end, incrementally increasing the applied torque. To measure the shear deformation, a torque measurement device (torque transducer) and an angular displacement sensor (protractor or strain gauge) are employed. Images of the experimental setup typically include a test rig with secure fixtures, the torque sensor mounted on the shaft, and the data acquisition system. Safety considerations are paramount; PPE such as gloves and eye protection are mandatory, and the equipment must be properly secured to prevent accidents due to sudden failure or slippage.

Standardized test procedures, such as those outlined by ASTM A938 or ISO 898-1, provide guidelines on test setup, specimen preparation, and safety protocols (ASTM, 2001; ISO, 2014). Data collection involves recording torque and angular displacement at each applied load step, allowing for the plotting of torque versus angle of twist graphs. These measurements facilitate the determination of torsional stiffness and enable comparison with theoretical predictions.

Results and Data Analysis

The recorded data include torque values and corresponding angles of rotation. The data tables show increasing torque with increasing twist, exhibiting a generally linear trend. Graphs plotting torque (Nm) versus angle (radians or degrees) are fitted with straight lines to determine the torsional stiffness, represented by the slope of the line (T/θ).

Torque (Nm): 0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0, 2.4, 2.8, 3.2, 3.6, 4.0, 4.2, 4.8, 5.2
Angle (°): 0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 1.8, 2.2, 2.6, 3.4, 3.8, 4.2, 4.38

The graph demonstrates a linear relationship consistent with elastic torsion theory. The torsional stiffness (k) derived from the slope facilitates the calculation of the theoretical shear modulus (G) by rearranging the torsion equation and using the measured diameter values.

Verification of the Torsion Equation

Verification involves calculating the theoretical shear modulus G_theo based on the experimental data and comparing it with the known value (38 GPa for brass). The experimental torque and angle data can be used to estimate the actual diameter of the shaft by rearranging the torsion equation:

    dactual = [(16  T  L) / (π  G  θ)]1/4

where L is the shaft length, T is the applied torque, θ is the measured angle in radians, and G is the shear modulus. The comparison between the theoretical and actual diameters provides verification of the torsion equation's validity within the elastic limit.

Error Analysis and Discussion

The observed data exhibited a predominantly linear trend, indicating elastic behavior. However, deviations from perfect linearity can occur due to factors such as material inhomogeneity, measurement inaccuracies, or slight misalignments in the experimental setup. The error analysis involves calculating the percentage difference between theoretical and experimental diameters, considering uncertainties in torque measurement and angle readings.

Discrepancies may also arise from assumptions made during calculations, such as ignoring shear stress concentrations, residual stresses, or assuming perfect rigidity at the fixed end. These factors contribute to the observed deviations and highlight the importance of meticulous experimental procedures and acknowledgment of potential sources of error.

In conclusion, the experimental results support the validity of the torsion equation for the brass shaft within the elastic limit, with minor deviations attributable to practical limitations. The linearity of the data confirms that the material's behavior adheres closely to theoretical predictions under the applied torsional loads.

Conclusion

The verification of the torsion equation using experimental data demonstrates its applicability within elastic limits, confirming that the relation T = (G J θ) / L accurately predicts the torsional behavior of circular shafts. The comparison between theoretical and actual diameters reinforces the importance of precise measurements and controlled testing environments in mechanical testing. These findings are significant for engineering design, where safety, reliability, and material efficiency depend on accurate torsional analysis.

Future work can explore the effects of material imperfections, dynamic loading conditions, and non-linear behaviors beyond the elastic limit to deepen understanding and refine the predictive models used in torsional analysis.

References

• ASTM International. (2001). ASTM A938 / A938M - 01(2010): Standard Test Methods for Shear Testing of Metallic Materials. ASTM.
• ISO. (2014). ISO 898-1: Mechanical properties of fasteners made of carbon steel and alloy steel — Part 1: Bolts, screws, and studs with tensile strength ranging from 400 MPa up to 1000 MPa. International Organization for Standardization.
• Shigley, J. E., & Mischke, C. R. (2004). Mechanical Engineering Design (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Budynas, R. G., & Nisbett, J. K. (2014). Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Popov, E. P. (1973). Beams, Plates, and Shells: Theory and Analysis. Prentice-Hall.
• Hibbeler, R. C. (2014). Mechanics of Materials (9th ed.). Pearson.
• Gere, J. M., & Timoshenko, S. P. (1999). Mechanics of Materials (4th ed.). Brooks Cole.
• Meriam, J. L., & Kraige, L. G. (2012). Engineering Mechanics: Dynamics (7th ed.). Wiley.
• Robert M. K., & William, G. (2003). Introduction to Engineering Materials. McGraw-Hill.
• Flight, B. (2019). Experimental Mechanics of Materials: Torsion Testing Techniques. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 25(3), 245-258.