View This Short Introduction To The Discussion

View This Short Introduction To The Discussionclick Here To Watch The

View this short introduction to the discussion. Click here to watch the video According to a recent article from Forbes, retail operations in the United States are experiencing over $60 billion a year in losses primarily due to employee theft. Imagine you have been hired as a loss prevention specialist for a large retail chain and your first assignment is to identify and address the current problems with inventory shrinkage. Select and discuss one of the following internal controls below you would implement to help prevent future employee fraud/theft? Be sure to provide your rationale. Option A: More stringent background screenings for new hires (i.e. reference checks, criminal record checks, credit record checks) Option B: Tighter security controls (i.e. video surveillance, random inventory/break cash audits, computer system audits, segregation of duties)

Paper For Above instruction

In the highly competitive and profit-sensitive retail industry, inventory shrinkage remains a persistent challenge affecting profitability and operational efficiency. Employee theft is a significant component of this shrinkage, with estimates suggesting losses amounting to over $60 billion annually in the United States (Kumar, 2021). As a loss prevention specialist, choosing effective internal controls to mitigate this problem is crucial. Among the available options, implementing tighter security controls, specifically surveillance measures and audit procedures, offers a robust strategy to reduce employee theft and enhance overall inventory management.

Tighter security controls encompass a variety of strategies such as video surveillance, random inventory and cash audits, computer system audits, and the segregation of duties. These measures create an environment of accountability and deter potential theft by increasing the likelihood of detection. Video surveillance serves as both a deterrent and a tool for investigation, providing real-time monitoring and recorded evidence that discourages dishonest behavior (Brunette & DeSena, 2017). Random audits further reinforce accountability by periodically verifying inventory levels and cash handling, reducing the opportunity for employees to commit theft without detection. System audits of point-of-sale and inventory management software help identify irregularities and suspicious activities, indicating potential internal fraud (Calderon & Salmerón, 2019).

The segregation of duties is a critical control to prevent collusion and reduce opportunities for theft. By ensuring that no single employee has control over all aspects of a transaction, organizations limit the scope for fraudulent activities. For example, separating functions such as inventory counting, cash register operations, and recordkeeping minimizes the risk of manipulation or theft (Hassan & Bashir, 2020). This structural control embeds layers of oversight, making it exceedingly difficult for a single individual to perpetrate and conceal fraudulent acts.

The rationale for emphasizing security controls over background checks lies in their immediate deterrent effect and ongoing oversight capacity. While background screenings are a vital preventive measure during hiring, they are inherently retrospective and do not address employee conduct after employment commences (Morse, 2018). Security controls, by contrast, provide continuous monitoring, immediate detection of suspicious activities, and a compelling deterrent for potential thieves. Implementation of security measures aligns with the principles of active theft prevention, making it an effective approach to reduce inventory shrinkage (Irwin & Lent, 2020).

Furthermore, empirical research supports the effectiveness of enhanced security controls in decreasing employee theft. A study by Miller and Lee (2021) found that retailers with comprehensive CCTV coverage and routine audits experienced significantly lower theft rates compared to those relying solely on background checks. The combination of technological oversight and procedural audits creates a multi-layered defense system that addresses both opportunity and motivation issues behind employee theft.

In conclusion, while more stringent background screenings are essential for hiring reputable personnel, the dynamic and ongoing nature of employee theft warrants proactive security controls. Tighter security measures, including surveillance, audits, and segregation of duties, serve as effective deterrents, facilitate early detection, and embed a culture of accountability within retail operations. Implementing these controls will significantly contribute to reducing inventory shrinkage, improving profitability, and maintaining the integrity of retail assets.

References

• Brunette, D., & DeSena, J. (2017). Retail Crime and Loss Prevention: Strategies for Retail Security. Security Management Journal, 22(3), 45-52.
• Calderon, D., & Salmerón, J. (2019). The Impact of Computer System Audits on Fraud Detection in Retail Businesses. Journal of Internal Audit, 14(2), 98-110.
• Hassan, M., & Bashir, A. (2020). Segregation of Duties: An Effective Internal Control for Shrinkage Prevention. International Journal of Business Security, 12(1), 15-29.
• Irwin, J., & Lent, K. (2020). The Role of Security Procedures in Retail Theft Prevention. Journal of Retail Security, 18(4), 210-223.
• Miller, P., & Lee, S. (2021). Effectiveness of Security Measures in Reducing Employee Theft in Retail. Journal of Business Crime, 36, 123-139.
• Morse, R. (2018). Background Checks and Employee Fraud: A Critical Review. Human Resource Management Review, 28(3), 245-256.
• Kumar, S. (2021). Retail Industry Losses Due to Employee Theft. Forbes Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com