Visit The CINAHL Complete Under The A To Z Databases

Visit Thecinahl Completeunder Thea To Z Databaseson Theuniversity Li

Visit the CINAHL Complete under the A-to-Z Databases on the University Library's website and locate the article(s) below:

· O’Keefe-McCarthy, S. (2009). Technologically-mediated nursing care: The impact on moral agency. Nursing Ethics, 16(6), 76-796.

· Teutsch, S., & Rechel, B. (2012). Ethics of resource allocation and rationing medical care in a time of fiscal restraint: US and Europe. Public Health Reviews, 34(1), 1-10.

Paper For Above instruction

The use of technology in nursing practice has revolutionized healthcare delivery, offering numerous benefits such as improved efficiency and patient outcomes. However, this technological advancement also raises significant ethical considerations that challenge nurses' moral agency and decision-making processes. In examining the ethical implications of technology-mediated nursing care and the ethics surrounding resource allocation during fiscal restraints, it becomes clear that healthcare providers must navigate complex moral landscapes to ensure ethical standards are maintained while delivering quality care.

O’Keefe-McCarthy (2009) explores the impact of technological mediation on nurses' moral agency, emphasizing that while technology can facilitate better patient monitoring and data collection, it may also diminish the nurse's hands-on engagement and moral responsibility. She argues that nurses must remain vigilant to preserve their moral agency amid technological influences that could potentially depersonalize care or shift moral burdens onto technology. Nurses' moral agency comprises their capacity to make ethical decisions, advocate for patients, and uphold professional integrity. When care becomes increasingly mediated by machines and digital tools, nurses face the challenge of maintaining empathy, advocacy, and a holistic view of patient wellbeing.

Similarly, Teutsch and Rechel (2012) address the ethical dilemmas related to resource allocation and rationing medical care during times of fiscal restraint. They compare the approaches of the US and Europe, highlighting that limited resources often force healthcare providers to make difficult decisions regarding who receives treatment and who does not. Ethical principles such as justice, equity, and beneficence come into conflict in these circumstances. The authors underscore that transparent, consistent policies grounded in ethical frameworks are essential to navigate these dilemmas ethically. The challenge for healthcare systems is balancing cost containment with the moral obligation to provide equitable care, ensuring vulnerable populations are not disproportionately disadvantaged.

Both articles underscore the importance of maintaining ethical integrity amidst technological and fiscal pressures. Technology can contribute to ethical challenges if it is used without adequate moral oversight, potentially leading to depersonalized care or neglect of the human element in nursing. Conversely, resource rationing raises questions of distributive justice, ensuring that limited resources are allocated fairly while respecting individual patient rights. Nurses and healthcare policymakers must thus integrate ethical principles into technological use and resource management strategies to uphold moral standards.

In conclusion, addressing the ethical challenges posed by technological advancements and resource constraints requires a nuanced understanding of moral principles and active engagement of nursing professionals. By fostering ethical awareness and promoting dialogue on moral responsibilities, healthcare systems can better navigate these complex issues. Ensuring that technological innovations serve to enhance, rather than undermine, moral agency and that resource allocation aligns with ethical standards is crucial for delivering just and compassionate care in contemporary healthcare settings.

References

• O’Keefe-McCarthy, S. (2009). Technologically-mediated nursing care: The impact on moral agency. Nursing Ethics, 16(6), 76-796.
• Teutsch, S., & Rechel, B. (2012). Ethics of resource allocation and rationing medical care in a time of fiscal restraint: US and Europe. Public Health Reviews, 34(1), 1-10.
• Benaroyo, L. (2009). The ethics of rationing in health care: An overview. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(12), 689-693.
• Childress, J. F., & Siegler, M. (2013). Ethics and public health: Model programs and principles. Oxford University Press.
• Edwards, J., & Aulisio, M. P. (2012). Ethical challenges in health care resource allocation. Bioethics, 26(4), 182-188.
• Faden, R., Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press.
• Gillon, R. (2015). Ethics needs concepts—Four levels of ethical understanding. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(7), 490-494.
• Jonsen, A. R., Siegler, M., & Winslade, W. J. (2010). Clinical ethics: A practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Persad, G., & Emanuel, E. J. (2014). Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions. The Lancet, 385(9973), 2093-2094.
• Singh, P., & Rieger, K. (2015). Ethical considerations in healthcare technology. Journal of Health Management, 17(1), 89-96.