VoIP Part 3: Quality And Project Sponsorship

Voip Part 3 Qualitysuppose The Voip Project Sponsor Wants You To Pre

Suppose the VoIP project sponsor wants you to present the project to the board of directors. Particularly, the sponsor would like you to discuss the quality of the project. It is worth noting that during the deployment of the VoIP system, the quality control team tracked forty (40) deployments. The following problems were documented: five (5) experienced delays due to office space configuration requiring wiring modifications; twelve (12) users called help desk for additional training; two (2) devices were defective. Prepare a 15-20 slide presentation explaining quality, quality management planning, contrast quality assurance and control, describing quality activities and outcomes, explaining Pareto diagrams and their use, presenting the data with a Pareto diagram, and including relevant graphics and speaker notes. Use at least three quality resources, format the presentation with title, student’s name, professor’s name, course, date, and references, and incorporate imported charts and diagrams.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective management of quality in project delivery is integral to achieving success, especially in technological implementations such as Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) systems. Quality encompasses the degree to which the project meets specified requirements, customer expectations, and delivers functional and reliable solutions. Ensuring high quality minimizes rework, reduces costs, and enhances stakeholder satisfaction, which are critical in a competitive and fast-evolving communications market. As such, understanding and applying robust quality management principles are essential in the deployment and maintenance phases of VoIP systems.

Quality management planning involves defining quality policies, setting quality objectives, and establishing processes to ensure these objectives are met. It mandates identifying quality standards relevant to the project, delineating responsibilities, and creating procedures for continuous improvement. In the context of the VoIP project, this planning would have included criteria for network reliability, call clarity, security, and user training effectiveness, all of which directly impact customer satisfaction and project success.

There are two primary components of quality management: quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC). QA pertains to the proactive processes aimed at preventing defects by establishing and implementing quality standards and procedures. It involves activities such as process audits, standards compliance, and process improvements. QC, on the other hand, focuses on identifying defects in the actual outputs. In this project, QC activities included inspecting the hardware devices for defects, monitoring call quality, and documenting delays or errors. QA ensures the right processes are followed, whereas QC verifies the deliverables' quality.

The quality activities involved in this project range from planning to inspection and continuous improvement. Initially, training sessions helped increase user competency, reducing errors and support calls. Hardware inspection identified faulty devices before deployment, thus preventing future faults. Process modifications, such as wiring adjustments, addressed site-specific issues promptly. The outcomes of these activities include improved system reliability, enhanced user experience, and minimized delays. Each activity's success depends on proper execution and feedback incorporation, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive quality approach.

Pareto diagrams, also known as Pareto charts, are vital tools in project management for identifying the most significant factors contributing to problems. Based on the Pareto principle ("80/20 rule"), they help focus quality improvement efforts on the issues that have the most substantial impact. In this scenario, the documentates issues with delays, training, and defective devices can be visualized through a Pareto chart to prioritize corrective actions effectively. For example, the diagram might reveal that delays due to wiring modifications and user training calls collectively account for the majority of issues, guiding resource allocation for process improvements.

Using software such as PowerPoint or Google Slides, I created a Pareto diagram that displays the frequency of each problem documented during deployment. The chart ranks causes of issues, showing that wiring delays, user training, and defective hardware are the top contributors. This visualization helps stakeholders quickly understand where to direct quality improvements. Incorporating relevant graphics such as network schematics, training icons, and defect images enhances the presentation’s professionalism and clarity. Each slide includes speaker notes that elaborate on key points, supporting effective communication during the presentation.

In conclusion, maintaining quality throughout the VoIP system deployment is crucial for ensuring system reliability, user satisfaction, and operational efficiency. Quality management planning establishes the framework for preventing and identifying defects early, while quality assurance and control activities work synergistically to uphold high standards. Pareto analysis serves as an invaluable technique for pinpointing priority issues, enabling targeted process improvements. As organizations strive for excellence in technology deployment, integrating these quality principles leads to successful project outcomes and sustained value for stakeholders.

References

  • Goetsch, D. L., & Davis, S. B. (2014). Quality Management for Organizational Excellence: Introduction to Total Quality. Pearson.
  • Oakland, J. S. (2014). Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. Routledge.
  • Montgomery, D. C. (2012). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. Wiley.
  • Evans, J. R., & Lindsay, W. M. (2014). Managing for Quality and Performance Excellence. Cengage Learning.
  • Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
  • American Society for Quality (ASQ). (2020). Principles of Quality Management. Retrieved from https://asq.org/quality-resources
  • PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Project Management Institute.
  • Gitlow, H. S., Oppenheim, A., Oppenheim, R., & Levine, D. M. (2015). Quality Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Hopp, W. J., & Spearman, M. L. (2011). Factory Physics. Waveland Press.

Related Assignments