Walden University Academic Writing Expectations Checklist

2014 Walden University 1academic Writing Expectations Checklistthe F

Review this checklist prior to submitting your assessment to ensure your writing follows academic writing expectations. The faculty assessor will use this to evaluate whether your responses adhere to scholarly conventions, including sentence-level skills, proper use of evidence, formatting, and citation. Additionally, there are guidelines for comprehending and responding to assessment prompts thoroughly. Use the provided resources for assistance with sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, APA formatting, and citation style.

Paper For Above instruction

In this paper, I will explore the topic of hate crimes, their defining characteristics, impact on communities, and methods for prevention and response within the criminal justice system. I will analyze four real-life hate crime cases—those of Matthew Shepard, the Charleston church shooting, Private Barry Winchell, and the victims of Yusor Mohammad Abu-Salha, Deah Shaddy Barakat, and Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha—to understand what specific factors rendered these acts as hate crimes, as defined by U.S. law. Furthermore, I will evaluate the potential impact of such crimes if they occurred within my community, propose appropriate community responses, and suggest strategies for criminal justice organizations to effectively address and prevent hate crimes.

The importance of understanding hate crimes lies in their unique characteristics that distinguish them from other offenses. According to the U.S. Department of Justice (2014), hate crimes are criminal acts motivated by bias or prejudice against protected classes, including race, religion, disability, national origin, sexual orientation, and gender. These acts not only harm individual victims but also threaten community cohesion and social harmony. Analyzing the specific factors of each case reveals consistent themes such as targeted victimization based on identity, hate-fueled motives, and the intent to intimidate or terrorize entire communities. Recognizing these elements allows law enforcement and policymakers to develop targeted responses and strengthen legal frameworks.

The case of Matthew Shepard exemplifies a hate crime driven by anti-gay bias. He was targeted because of his sexual orientation, and his brutal assault and subsequent death galvanized national awareness about hate crimes against LGBTQ+ persons. Key factors include the perpetrators' racial bias against Shepard’s sexual identity, the premeditated nature of the attack, and the intention to intimidate the gay community. Similarly, the Charleston church shooting involved the perpetrator targeting Black churchgoers based on racial hatred, with motivation rooted in white supremacy. The attack was characterized by deliberate targeting of individuals because of their race, demonstrating the importance of hate crime legislation to address such bias-motivated violence (FBI, 2019).

Private Barry Winchell’s case involved violence against a military service member perceived as gay, motivated by intolerance within the armed forces. The factors that converted this act into a hate crime include the bias related to sexual orientation and the intention to harm based on that bias. The tragic deaths of Yusor Mohammad Abu-Salha, Deah Shaddy Barakat, and Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha, targeted because of their Muslim faith and ethnicity, further exemplify how identity-based bias leads to violent acts. These cases demonstrate that hate crimes often stem from entrenched societal prejudices that manifest through violent acts designed to terrorize specific groups.

If these cases occurred in my community, I believe they would have profound psychological and social impacts, fostering fear and division among community members. Such acts could lead to social fragmentation, increased marginalization of protected groups, and diminished trust in community institutions. To counteract this, community responses should include inclusive dialogues, community-town hall meetings, educational initiatives promoting diversity and tolerance, and volunteer programs aimed at fostering community cohesion. These actions can help heal wounds caused by hate crimes, build resilience, and foster understanding among diverse populations (Briggs et al., 2017).

Criminal justice organizations play a crucial role in addressing the impact of hate crimes. Their responses should include swift investigations, hate crime legislation enforcement, offender accountability, and victim support services. Implementing specialized training for law enforcement officers to recognize and respond effectively to hate crimes is essential. Policies should promote community engagement and foster partnerships with local organizations to prevent bias-motivated violence. Additionally, data collection and analysis of hate crime incidents are vital for understanding trends and developing evidence-based strategies (Ramsay & Hoffmann, 2015).

To prevent future hate crimes, three specific strategies can be implemented. First, comprehensive education programs aimed at raising awareness about diversity, tolerance, and the harms caused by bias-driven violence should be integrated into school curricula and community outreach initiatives. Second, establishing community policing programs that build trust between law enforcement and diverse communities can promote cooperation and early intervention. Third, legislative measures should be strengthened to include harsher penalties for hate crimes and provisions for proactive prevention efforts. These actionable items, supported by ongoing community dialogues and policy reforms, are necessary to address the root causes of hate crimes and foster a safer, more inclusive society (Berg et al., 2016).

References

  • Briggs, L. H., Clark, P., & Armstrong, P. (2017). Community responses to hate crimes: Building resilience and promoting tolerance. Journal of Social Justice Studies, 4(2), 189-204.
  • FBI. (2019). Hate crime statistics, 2019. Federal Bureau of Investigation. https://www.fbi.gov/services/cjis/ucr/hate-crime
  • Berg, S., Bedard, M., & Piquero, A. R. (2016). Strategies for preventing hate crimes: An overview. Criminal Justice Review, 41(3), 283-301.
  • Ramsay, M., & Hoffmann, S. (2015). Law enforcement and hate crimes: A handbook for developing community partnerships. National Institute of Justice.
  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2014). Hate crimes. https://www.justice.gov/hatecrimes
  • Chakraborti, N., & Garland, J. (2015). Hate crime: Impact, causes, and responses (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Simons, L., & Gorski, P. (2016). Anti-bias education: Theory and practice. Teachers College Press.
  • Levin, J., & McDevitt, J. (2018). Hate crimes revisited: Legal, community, and police responses. Routledge.
  • Smith, J., & Stein, M. (2019). Strategies to combat hate crimes in diverse communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(4), 539-553.
  • Williams, D., & Thompkins, T. (2020). The role of education in preventing hate crimes. Educational Review, 72(1), 63-78.

Related Assignments