Walt Disney Continues Working With Your Company And Industry

Walt Disneycontinue Working With Your Company And Industry From Week 2

WALT DISNEY Continue working with your company and industry from Week 2 for forums and complete the following: 1. Perform research (minimum of 2 sources in APA format). 2. Integrate the company's political and legal environments from its domestic country. 3. What barriers do you notice? 4. What limitations do you see for this company? 5. Minimum 3 complete paragraphs; a paragraph is a minimum of 100 words. 6. Reply to 2 other of your classmates’ original posting. 7. Refer to the syllabus about the minimum requirements for forums. LO - 5 - Working with their chosen company, the student will detect and evaluate the political and legal limitations and barriers using both the Domestic and Global environments.

Paper For Above instruction

The Walt Disney Company, one of the most iconic entertainment giants globally, operates within complex political and legal environments that significantly influence its strategic decisions and operational capabilities. In its domestic environment, which is primarily the United States, Disney encounters a landscape characterized by a stable political system, well-defined legal frameworks, and enforcement agencies that regulate entertainment and intellectual property rights. The U.S. legal environment offers substantial protections for copyrights, trademarks, and patents, which are vital for Disney’s extensive portfolio of creative content. However, challenges such as fluctuating policies on copyright durations, trademark disputes, and antitrust regulations can pose risks. For example, recent debates over copyright laws have impacted Disney’s ability to protect its copyrighted characters and media for extended periods, thereby affecting its revenue streams and market advantage. Moreover, the company faces legal constraints related to content regulation, censorship, and distribution rights, which can vary across states and impact marketing strategies and content delivery.

On a global scale, Disney faces a diverse and often unpredictable political and legal environment that varies significantly across countries. In many foreign markets, political stability and legal infrastructure are less developed, which can threaten Disney’s operations through issues such as regulatory uncertainties, intellectual property infringement, and restrictions on media content. For instance, in countries like China, Disney must navigate strict regulatory controls over media and cultural content, often requiring localization and compliance with government censorship policies. The barriers include legal restrictions on foreign media, which may hinder Disney’s storytelling and expansion efforts. Additionally, political tensions between nations can influence trade policies, import tariffs, and cross-border licensing agreements, further constraining the company’s global growth. These barriers often force Disney to adapt its business models, potentially limiting innovation and market presence in certain regions.

Paper For Above instruction

In analyzing Disney’s global and domestic environments, it is crucial to identify the country clusters in which the company operates. In the United States, Disney is situated within the individualist and low-context culture cluster, characterized by a direct communication style, emphasis on individual rights, and a relatively liberal business environment. Conversely, in China, Disney operates within the collective and high-context culture cluster, where relationships, harmony, and indirect communication play significant roles. These cultural differences influence Disney’s strategic approaches, marketing campaigns, and content localization efforts. Sociocultural factors such as consumer preferences, cultural taboos, and entertainment norms either facilitate or hinder Disney’s efforts to attract and retain audiences. For example, the company’s success in applying culturally sensitive content has led to increased market penetration, but cultural missteps can result in public relations issues or rejection of its offerings.

Disney's achievements and setbacks in these diverse clusters provide insights into its ability to adapt and succeed globally. In the U.S., Disney’s established brand dominance and innovative content production have allowed it to maintain a leading position. Conversely, in China, Disney’s collaboration with local partners and adaptation to local culture have enabled growth, although it still faces challenges posed by regulatory barriers and cultural differences. The company's strategy to create culturally relevant content, such as local-themed attractions and localized characters, exemplifies its efforts to successfully navigate these sociocultural environments. Overall, Disney’s focus on understanding and integrating local cultures with its global brand image has proven vital for its sustained success, despite the challenges posed by differing values, norms, and consumer behaviors across these clusters.

Paper For Above instruction

Evaluating the economic environments of Disney’s domestic and international operations reveals contrasting but interconnected dynamics. In the United States, Disney benefits from a mature, highly developed economy characterized by high consumer spending, technological innovation, and robust infrastructure. Using Rostow’s stages of economic growth, the U.S. falls within the highest stage, the "Drive to Maturity," reflecting continued innovation and economic resilience. Galbraith’s theory of affluent society is also applicable, highlighting the influence of high-income consumers on Disney's premium entertainment offerings and theme parks. In contrast, many emerging markets where Disney is expanding, such as India and parts of Africa, are in earlier stages of economic development, with lower income levels and less sophisticated infrastructure. These regions are often in the "Traditional Society" or "Preconditions for Takeoff" stages, presenting limitations for Disney's growth due to lower disposable incomes and limited technological access.

Limitations on Disney’s expansion into less developed economies include infrastructural deficits, lower consumer purchasing power, and unfamiliarity with Western entertainment formats. Moreover, economic volatility in emerging markets can threaten long-term investments and local profitability. For example, currency fluctuations and inflation rates in countries like India or Brazil can significantly impact Disney’s pricing strategy and profit margins. Conversely, in developed markets, the company enjoys stability but faces saturation risks and intense competition. The contrast between these economic environments underscores the importance of tailored strategies for different markets. While technological innovations in content delivery and digital streaming can mitigate some infrastructural issues, economic limitations remain a significant hurdle for Disney's sustained international growth, requiring adaptive approaches aligned with each region’s stage of economic development.

Paper For Above instruction

In synthesizing the different environments Disney operates within, integrating insights from economic theories such as Rostow’s model and Galbraith’s affluent society theory helps illustrate how these environments interact and influence the company’s strategic decisions. Rostow’s model suggests that Disney’s expansion into emerging markets is aligned with the "Preconditions for Takeoff" and "Takeoff" stages, where infrastructure and economic growth are still developing. Galbraith’s theory emphasizes the influence of high-income consumer segments and the importance of affluent societies in sustaining a premium entertainment business. These theories demonstrate that while Disney’s domestic environment benefits from high consumer purchasing power and advanced infrastructure, its global expansion relies heavily on navigating lower-income markets with emerging economic structures. The limitations imposed by infrastructural deficits, economic volatility, and cultural differences can hinder growth, but strategic investments and localization efforts can create synergies. To enhance global success, Disney could leverage digital distribution channels, local partnerships, and culturally tailored content to overcome these barriers and foster sustainable growth.

References

• Andreassen, T. W., & Lindestad, B. (1998). Customer loyalty and switching costs: The mediating impact of perceived risk. Journal of Service Research, 1(2), 82-92.
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. Sage Publications.
• Lincoln, A., & Grafton, R. Q. (2020). International Business and Economics: Expand your understanding of global markets. Business Horizons, 63(3), 317-328.
• Rostow, W. W. (1960). The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge University Press.
• Galbraith, J. K. (1958). The Affluent Society. Houghton Mifflin.
• Hitt, M., Ireland, R., & Hoskisson, R. (2017). Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization. Cengage Learning.
• Kim, Y. (2019). Cultural adaptation strategies of multinational corporations in emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(4), 526-542.
• Mintzberg, H. (1987). The Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy. California Management Review, 30(1), 11–24.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.
• Yip, G. S. (1989). Global strategy... in a world of nations? Sloan Management Review, 31(1), 29-41.