Wanda Has Been Working As An Administrative Assistant For 8

Wanda Has Been Working As An Administrative Assistant For 8 Years In

Wanda has been working as an administrative assistant for 8 years. In this position, Wanda spends 90% of her day sitting at a desk working on a computer. This year, Wanda was diagnosed with degenerative disc disease, which affects her spine and back. She has complained about pain due to prolonged sitting every day. She discussed with her doctor and brought her manager a doctor’s note stating that she must be able to alternate sitting and standing throughout the day. The doctor suggests the employee be provided with an ergonomic workstation that can transition from sitting to standing easily. Complete a full ADA analysis (explain your analysis of each factor under the law). Does this employee fall under the protection of the ADA? Review the suggested accommodation under the factors used by courts (detail your analysis below). Should the company provide the accommodation?

Paper For Above instruction

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 serves as a comprehensive civil rights law prohibiting discrimination against individuals with disabilities in various areas, including employment. Analyzing Wanda’s situation requires examining whether her condition qualifies as a disability under the ADA, and if so, whether she is entitled to a reasonable accommodation, such as an ergonomic workstation that can transition from sitting to standing.

ADA Coverage and Definition of Disability

The first step in this analysis is to determine if Wanda qualifies as an individual with a disability under the ADA. The statute defines a disability as (1) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, (2) a record of such an impairment, or (3) being regarded as having such an impairment (42 U.S.C. § 12102). In Wanda’s case, her diagnosis of degenerative disc disease and related pain likely satisfies the first prong if her condition substantially limits her ability to perform major life activities, such as working or sitting for extended periods.

The ADA’s definition emphasizes the impact on major life activities; disability does not require a total inability to perform these activities but rather a substantial limitation. When considering her pain and mobility limitations, especially given her need to alternate sitting and standing, Wanda’s condition probably qualifies as a disability under the ADA’s broad interpretation. Courts have consistently held that chronic health conditions that limit an employee's ability to perform daily tasks or working activities meet the definition of disability under the ADA (EEOC v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 839 F. Supp. 1120 (D. Ill. 1993)).

Analysis of the Reasonable Accommodation Request

Next, it is essential to analyze whether the requested accommodation—the ergonomic workstation that transitions from sitting to standing—constitutes a reasonable adjustment under the ADA. Reasonable accommodations are modifications or adjustments that enable an employee with a disability to perform the essential functions of their position without imposing an undue hardship on the employer (29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)(1)(ii)).

The company’s obligation to provide accommodations hinges on several factors: the employee’s limitations, the effectiveness of the proposed accommodation, and the feasibility or undue hardship associated with implementation. In Wanda’s case, an ergonomic workstation that allows her to alternate between sitting and standing directly addresses her medical needs, reduces her pain, and enables her to perform her job more effectively. Courts have regarded adjustable sit-stand desks as a common, cost-effective accommodation that typically does not impose significant burden on employers (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Enforcement Guidance on Reasonable Accommodation).

Furthermore, this accommodation aligns with the ADA’s requirement for employers to provide modifications that enable employees to perform their essential job functions. Given her extensive tenure and the clear medical documentation, providing such an ergonomic solution is not only reasonable but also consistent with best practices in workplace health.

Legal Factors and Court Considerations

In assessing whether to grant the accommodation, courts consider multiple factors outlined by the EEOC and other legal precedents. These include: (1) the nature and cost of the accommodation; (2) the overall financial resources of the employer; (3) the number of employees and the effect on expenses; (4) the resources of the facility involved; and (5) the impact on the operation of the employer’s business (42 U.S.C. § 12111(10); 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(p)). Given that ergonomic standing desks are widely available and not excessively costly, providing such an accommodation minimally impacts the employer’s operational resources.

Additionally, implementing this accommodation demonstrates good-faith compliance with ADA obligations and can foster an inclusive and supportive workplace culture. Employers who proactively accommodate employees often benefit from increased morale, productivity, and reduced absenteeism (Baker, 2017).

Should the Company Provide the Accommodation?

Based on the analysis, Wanda’s condition qualifies as a disability under the ADA, and her accommodation request is reasonable and practical. The provision of an ergonomic, adjustable workstation aligns with ADA requirements and would enable her to perform her essential job duties without undue hardship. Refusing to provide this accommodation could result in a potential ADA violation and legal liability.

Furthermore, accommodating employees with disabilities aligns with best employment practices and corporate social responsibility. An accessible workplace benefits not only Wanda but also contributes to a more inclusive environment for others with health limitations. Therefore, the company should provide the ergonomic workstation to support Wanda’s health needs and comply with federal disability nondiscrimination laws.

Conclusion

Wanda’s medical condition and job responsibilities clearly bring her within the protections of the ADA. Given her diagnosis and the functional limitations she experiences, she qualifies as a person with a disability under federal law. The employer’s obligation to provide reasonable accommodation includes supplying an ergonomic workstation that allows her to alternate between sitting and standing. Such accommodation is both reasonable and feasible, with minimal impact on company resources. Thus, the employer should provide the ergonomic workstation to meet their legal obligations and support Wanda’s health and productivity in the workplace.

References

• 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)(1)(ii).
• 42 U.S.C. § 12102.
• EEOC v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 839 F. Supp. 1120 (D. Ill. 1993).
• U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. ({$publication date}) Enforcement Guidance on Reasonable Accommodation. Available at: https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/enforcement-guidance-reasonable-accommodation
• Baker, M. (2017). Workplace accommodations for employees with disabilities. Journal of Workplace Inclusion, 5(2), 15-22.
• Smith, J. (2019). Legal considerations for workplace ergonomic accommodations. HR Law Journal, 9(3), 45-52.
• ADA National Network. (2020). Employment Title I. https://adata.org/learn-about-ada/employment
• Weber, K., & Murphy, S. (2018). Disability rights and employment law. Legal Studies Forum, 42(1), 78-95.
• Johnson, L. (2021). Cost-benefit analysis of accommodations in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(2), 231-244.
• U.S. Department of Labor. (2022). Workplace Accommodations and Assistive Technologies. https://olc.dol.gov/media/3021