We Have Discussed The Creation Of DHS Which Combined 22 Agen

We Have Discussed The Creation Of Dhs Which Combined 22 Agencies Into

We Have Discussed The Creation Of Dhs Which Combined 22 Agencies Into

We have discussed the creation of DHS which combined 22 agencies into one. Similarly, after 9/11, the position of Director, National Intelligence was created to provide oversight of the Intelligence Community. Yet there are still 17 separate intelligence agencies in US government: Director, National Intelligence; Central Intelligence Agency; Department of Energy; Department of Homeland Security; Department of State; Department of Treasury; Defense Intelligence Agency; Drug Enforcement Agency; Federal Bureau of Investigation; National Geospatial Intelligence Agency; National Reconnaissance Office; National Security Agency; Air Force Intelligence; Army Intelligence; Naval Intelligence; Marine Corps Intelligence; Coast Guard Intelligence. Of these, which do you feel would be most effective in accomplishing homeland security goals in the international arena? Select and discuss a program in this agency to support your view. Which agency do you feel would be least effective in these endeavors? Why? This is not a paper. 350 words 2 references

Paper For Above instruction

The U.S. intelligence community comprises multiple agencies, each with distinct roles and expertise that collectively contribute to homeland security, especially in the international arena. Among these, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) stands out as particularly effective due to its multifaceted approach encompassing intelligence gathering, counterterrorism operations, and international collaboration. The FBI’s International Counterterrorism Program exemplifies this effectiveness, as it actively collaborates with foreign law enforcement agencies, sharing intelligence and coordinating efforts to prevent terrorist activities before they reach U.S. borders. This program enhances international partnerships, enabling timely information exchange and joint investigations, which are critical in disrupting transnational terrorist networks. Such proactive engagement not only protects American interests domestically but also promotes global security, demonstrating the agency's influence in the international arena.

Conversely, the Department of Energy (DOE) may be the least effective in accomplishing homeland security goals internationally. While the DOE plays a vital role in nuclear security and energy Policy, its focus is primarily domestic, centered on nuclear weapon stewardship and energy regulation. Although the department collaborates with international partners regarding nuclear non-proliferation, its scope does not encompass the broader spectrum of homeland security initiatives that involve terrorism prevention and intelligence operations abroad. Consequently, the DOE’s limited emphasis on operational intelligence and counterterrorism hampers its capacity to contribute significantly to homeland security in the international arena compared to agencies like the FBI. Recognizing the different capacities and strategic focuses of these agencies underscores the importance of cross-agency coordination to effectively address global homeland security threats.

References

  • Tenet, M. (2007). At the Center of the Storm: My Life in the CIA. HarperCollins.
  • Lowenthal, M. M. (2017). Intelligence: From Secrets to Policy. CQ Press.